Neural Stimulation with an Endovascular Brain-Machine Interface

Stimulation of deep cortical structures has been demonstrated to provide symptomatic alleviation to people with depression, Parkinson’s disease and epilepsy. However, electrodes used clinically for therapies requiring deep-brain-stimulation are currently limited to those that penetrate directly through delicate neural tissue following craniotomy or burr-hole surgery. Using an endovascular neural interface, the risks associated with open-brain surgery can be mitigated. Previously, we demonstrated proof-of-concept that a stent-electrode array can access the brain via blood vessels and can record high-fidelity neural information over a chronic duration. However, it was unknown whether focal stimulation could be delivered from within a cortical vessel. This work demonstrates that a stent-mounted electrode array can stimulate various regions of the sheep motor cortex to elicit visually observable and independent movements of the lip, face, jaw, neck and limb. While inter-animal differences were observed with respect to the elicited movement and stimulation threshold required to generate a response, there was reasonable consistency regarding the response and the location of the stimulating electrodes from the branching central sulcal veins. Six animals were observed to have multiple different and independent muscle movements time-locked to electrical stimulation.

[1]  David M. Himes,et al.  Prediction of seizure likelihood with a long-term, implanted seizure advisory system in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy: a first-in-man study , 2013, The Lancet Neurology.

[2]  G. Deuschl,et al.  A randomized trial of deep-brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  Edgard Morya,et al.  Comprehensive Analysis of Tissue Preservation and Recording Quality from Chronic Multielectrode Implants , 2011, PloS one.

[4]  Alim Louis Benabid,et al.  New targets for DBS. , 2012, Parkinsonism & related disorders.

[5]  David B. Grayden,et al.  The ovine motor cortex: A review of functional mapping and cytoarchitecture , 2017, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[6]  Leonid Churilov,et al.  Minimally invasive endovascular stent-electrode array for high-fidelity, chronic recordings of cortical neural activity , 2016, Nature Biotechnology.

[7]  Justin C. Sanchez,et al.  Comprehensive characterization and failure modes of tungsten microwire arrays in chronic neural implants , 2012, Journal of neural engineering.

[8]  John T. Gale,et al.  RISK FACTORS FOR HEMORRHAGE DURING MICROELECTRODE‐GUIDED DEEP BRAIN STIMULATION AND THE INTRODUCTION OF AN IMPROVED MICROELECTRODE DESIGN , 2009, Neurosurgery.

[9]  Allison T. Connolly,et al.  Computational modeling of an endovascular approach to deep brain stimulation , 2014, Journal of neural engineering.

[10]  T. Schwartz,et al.  Evolution of cranial epilepsy surgery complication rates: a 32-year systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2014, Journal of neurosurgery.

[11]  Terence J. O'Brien,et al.  Chronic impedance spectroscopy of an endovascular stent-electrode array , 2016, Journal of neural engineering.

[12]  David B. Grayden,et al.  Implant design and development , 2006 .

[13]  Patricia Desmond,et al.  An ovine model of cerebral catheter venography for implantation of an endovascular neural interface. , 2017, Journal of neurosurgery.

[14]  Terence J O'Brien,et al.  Signal quality of simultaneously recorded endovascular, subdural and epidural signals are comparable , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[15]  M. Lyons Deep brain stimulation: current and future clinical applications. , 2011, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[16]  Mark Sedrak,et al.  Potential surgical targets for deep brain stimulation in treatment-resistant depression. , 2008, Neurosurgical focus.

[17]  Chris E. Williams,et al.  First-in-Human Trial of a Novel Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis , 2014, PloS one.

[18]  Tejas Sankar,et al.  Deep brain stimulation emerging indications. , 2011, Progress in brain research.

[19]  Terence J. O'Brien,et al.  Micro-CT and Histological Evaluation of an Neural Interface Implanted Within a Blood Vessel , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  Alice K. Cho,et al.  Retinal prostheses: current clinical results and future needs. , 2011, Ophthalmology.

[21]  A. Levey,et al.  Implanted neural electrodes cause chronic, local inflammation that is correlated with local neurodegeneration , 2009, Journal of neural engineering.

[22]  David B. Grayden,et al.  Feasibility of a chronic, minimally invasive endovascular neural interface , 2016, 2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[23]  J. Hahn,et al.  Complications of invasive video-EEG monitoring with subdural grid electrodes , 2002, Neurology.