From Dispositional Attributions to Behavior Motives The Folk-Conceptual Theory and Implications for Communication

This chapter introduces a new theoretical account of attribution—the folk-conceptual theory of behavior explanations (Malle, 1999)—to communication and discusses its implications for understanding communication phenomena. This new perspective has emerged from concerns about classic attribution theory, based on the person-situation distinction, and its ability to account for the cognitive complexity and social functions of attributions. The folk-conceptual theory distinguishes between explanations for intentional and unintentional behaviors, capturing different types of motives that can be inferred for intentional behaviors, and links explanations with their social and communicative functions. We lay out several directions for the theory to be usefully explored in communication to extend the field’s thinking about how attributions are affected by, affect, and are communicated in social interaction. At the same time, we discuss how communication perspectives can enrich the folk-conceptual theory by integrating the socio-communicative context more fully into the analysis of explanations in social interaction.

[1]  D. Hilton.  THE SOCIAL CONTEXT OF REASONING : CONVERSATIONAL INFERENCE AND RATIONAL JUDGMENT , 1995 .

[2]  Anita L. Vangelisti,et al.  Messages that hurt. , 1994 .

[3]  M. Leary,et al.  Attributions of responsibility for collective endeavors. , 1987 .

[4]  Dariusz Galasiński.  The Language of Deception: A Discourse Analytical Study , 2000 .

[5]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Paranoid Cognition in Social Systems: Thinking and Acting in the Shadow of Doubt , 1998, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[6]  B. Malle,et al.  The Folk Concept of Intentionality , 1997 .

[7]  Jennifer L. Gibbs,et al.  Reconceptualizing Virtual Teaming from a Constitutive Perspective Review, Redirection, and Research Agenda , 2008 .

[8]  S. Dunwoody,et al.  After the Flood , 2008 .

[9]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  CONFLICT AND SHARED IDENTITY IN GEOGRAPHICALLY DISTRIBUTED TEAMS , 2001 .

[10]  J. Burgoon,et al.  Interpersonal Deception Theory , 1996 .

[11]  Joseph B. Walther,et al.  Misattribution in virtual groups : The effects of member distribution on self-serving bias and partner blame , 2007 .

[12]  David E. Kanouse,et al.  Negativity in evaluations. , 1987 .

[13]  L. D'Ambrosio,et al.  Framing Emotional Response , 2004 .

[14]  Anita L. Vangelisti,et al.  When Words Hurt: The Effects of Perceived Intentionality on Interpersonal Relationships , 2000 .

[15]  The rocky road from acts to dispositions: Insights for attribution theory from developmental research on theories of mind , 2001 .

[16]  B. Malle,et al.  Actor-observer asymmetries in explanations of behavior: new answers to an old question. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  Alan L. Sillars.  Attributions and communication in roommate conflicts , 1980 .

[18]  K. Floyd,et al.  Affectionate Behavior in Adult Platonic Friendships Interpreting and Evaluating Expectancy Violations , 1999 .

[19]  Donelson R. Forsyth,et al.  Responsibility Diffusion in Cooperative Collectives , 2002 .

[20]  Roger Lamb,et al.  Attribution in conversational context: Effect of mutual knowledge on explanation‐giving , 1993 .

[21]  Andrea Sonnleitner,et al.  Folk theory of mind: Conceptual foundations of human social cognition. , 2006 .

[22]  W. Turnbull.  Everyday Explanation: The Pragmatics of Puzzle Resolution , 1986 .

[23]  Norah E. Dunbar,et al.  Causal Attributions for Collaborative Public Speaking Presentations in College Classes , 2005 .

[24]  S. Murphy,et al.  Priming Prejudice How Stereotypes and Counter‐Stereotypes Influence Attribution of Responsibility and Credibility among Ingroups and Outgroups , 1996 .

[25]  C. Cramton.  Attribution in distributed work groups. , 2002 .

[26]  Albert C. Gunther,et al.  What We Think Others Think , 1991 .

[27]  Excuses in everyday interaction. , 1992 .

[28]  Yaacov Schul,et al.  Dealing with Deceptions that are Difficult to Detect: Encoding and Judgment as a Function of Preparing to Receive Invalid Information , 1996 .

[29]  Siobhan Chapman.  Logic and Conversation , 2005 .

[30]  “Because I Love You …” The Tactical Use of Attributional Expressions in Conversation , 1991 .

[31]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  Lying Words: Predicting Deception from Linguistic Styles , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[32]  James J. Lindsay,et al.  Cues to deception. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[33]  Valerie Manusov,et al.  Yours, Mine, and Ours , 1997 .

[34]  A. Vrij.  Detecting Lies and Deceit: The Psychology of Lying and the Implications for Professional Practice , 2000 .

[35]  John H. Harvey,et al.  Self-Disclosure, Attribution, and Social Interaction , 1981 .

[36]  Denise Haunani Solomon,et al.  Appraisals and Distancing Responses to Hurtful Messages , 2008, Commun. Res..

[37]  B. Malle,et al.  How people explain actions performed by groups and individuals. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[38]  Joseph B. Walther,et al.  Misattribution and attributional redirection in distributed virtual groups , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[39]  A. Gopnik,et al.  The Social Folk Theorist: Insights from Social and Cultural Psychology on the , 2001 .

[40]  Timothy R. Levine,et al.  Accuracy in detecting truths and lies: Documenting the “veracity effect” , 1999 .

[41]  Adrienne Y. Lee,et al.  Language of lies in prison: linguistic classification of prisoners' truthful and deceptive natural language , 2005 .

[42]  Steven A. Mccornack.  Information manipulation theory , 1992 .

[43]  Joel Waldfogel,et al.  Introduction , 2010, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[44]  Kimberly Gross.  Framing Persuasive Appeals: Episodic and Thematic Framing, Emotional Response, and Policy Opinion , 2008 .

[45]  Brian H. Spitzberg,et al.  Attribution Theory: Finding Good Cause in the Search for Theory , 2008 .

[46]  B. Malle.  How the Mind Explains Behavior: Folk Explanations, Meaning, and Social Interaction , 2004 .

[47]  John H. Harvey,et al.  Attribution, communication behavior, and close relationships , 2001 .

[48]  P. Andrews.  Gender Differences in Persuasive Communication and Attribution of Success and Failure , 1987 .

[49]  F D Fincham,et al.  Attributions in marriage: review and critique. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[50]  Joseph B. Walther,et al.  Attributions in Virtual Groups , 2009 .

[51]  H. Spada,et al.  Evaluation of environmental problems: A coherence model of cognition and emotion , 2001 .

[52]  B. Malle,et al.  Conceptual structure and social functions of behavior explanations: beyond person--situation attributions. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[53]  Dare A. Baldwin,et al.  Introduction: The significance of intentionality , 2001 .

[54]  A. White.  Essays on Actions and Events. , 1981 .

[55]  M. Sinaceur,et al.  Suspending judgment to create value: Suspicion and trust in negotiation , 2010 .

[56]  Alexander Todorov,et al.  Communication context, explanation, and social judgment , 2000 .

[57]  Jeffrey T. Hancock,et al.  On Lying and Being Lied To: A Linguistic Analysis of Deception in Computer-Mediated Communication , 2007 .

[58]  D. Hilton.  Conversational processes and causal explanation. , 1990 .

[59]  Bertram F. Malle,et al.  Folk Theory of Mind: Conceptual Foundations of Social Cognition , 2003 .

[60]  Bertram F. Malle,et al.  Attributions as Behavior Explanations: Toward a New Theory , 2003 .

[61]  Making sense of hurtful interactions in close relationships: When hurt feelings create distance. , 2001 .

[62]  H. Dan O'Hair,et al.  The Management of Failure Events: Some Contextual Determinants of Accounting Behavior , 1983 .

[63]  Brian H. Spitzberg,et al.  Attribution biases and associations between conflict strategies and competence outcomes , 1990 .

[64]  S. Dunwoody,et al.  Attributions in explanations of risk estimates , 2002, Public understanding of science.

[65]  Miles Hewstone,et al.  The ‘ultimate attribution error’? A review of the literature on intergroup causal attribution , 1990 .

[66]  A. ReesvanM.,et al.  Explaining and arguing. The social organization of accounts , 1995 .

[67]  M. Banaji,et al.  Perceptions of the Collective Other , 1998, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[68]  C. Rees,et al.  “Enough is enough, I don’t want any audience”: exploring medical students’ explanations of consent-related behaviours , 2008, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.

[69]  Sara Kiesler,et al.  Relationship effects in psychological explanations of nonhuman behavior , 2006 .

[70]  Stephen J. Zaccaro,et al.  Self-Serving Attributions for Individual and Group Performance , 1987 .

[71]  Mira Sotirovic.  How Individuals Explain Social Problems: The Influences of Media Use , 2003 .

[72]  C. Cramton.  The Mutual Knowledge Problem and Its Consequences for Dispersed Collaboration , 2001 .

[73]  B. Malle,et al.  How People Explain Behavior: A New Theoretical Framework , 1999, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[74]  Amy M. Bippus.  Humor motives, qualities, and reactions in recalled conflict episodes , 2003 .

[75]  F. Heider.  The psychology of interpersonal relations , 1958 .

[76]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  Effects of head movement on perceptions of humanoid robot behavior , 2006, HRI '06.

[77]  Charles T. Salmon,et al.  THE ‘OTHER’ AS THE VULNERABLE VOTER: A STUDY OF THE THIRD-PERSON EFFECT IN THE 1988 U.S. PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN , 1990 .