Learning From Simulation Design to Develop Better Experiential Learning Initiatives

Simulations offer engaging learning experiences, via the provision of feedback or the opportunities for experimentation. However, they lack important attributes valued by marketing educators and employers. This article proposes a “back to basics” look at what constitutes an effective experiential learning initiative. Drawing on the education literature, the article presents a set of propositions for the development of initiatives that deliver deep learning, promote engagement, and develop digital marketing and soft skills. The article notes the attributes of simulations that deliver effective experiential learning, but also where other formats may be superior to simulations, and advocates for an integrative approach. The article illustrates the application of these propositions, and integrative approach, to the development of a highly successful experiential learning initiative, the Google Online Marketing Challenge. The article concludes with the following recommendations for marketing educators engaged in experiential learning: students need to plan, execute, and assess their actions, which requires the provision of feedback mechanisms as part of the experience; the experience should be gamified to increase engagement; developers need to provide guidance and support, to both students and educators, to reduce extraneous cognitive load; the initiative needs to develop digital marketing literacy, as well as soft skills.

[1]  M. Trevisan Practical Training in Evaluation: A Review of the Literature , 2004 .

[2]  Lillian C. McDermott,et al.  Research as a guide for curriculum development: An example from introductory electricity , 1992 .

[3]  J. Reeve,et al.  What teachers say and do to support students' autonomy during a learning activity. , 2006 .

[4]  Rita D. Kosnik,et al.  Transformational Learning In Business Education: The Pivotal Role Of Experiential Learning Projects , 2013 .

[5]  John A. Schibrowsky,et al.  The Dark Side of Experiential Learning Activities , 1995 .

[6]  Rachel. Sara Learning from Life — Exploring the Potential of Live Projects in Higher Education , 2011 .

[7]  R. Brennan Reflecting on Experiential Learning in Marketing Education , 2014 .

[8]  Lois J. Smith Content and Delivery: A Comparison and Contrast of Electronic and Traditional MBA Marketing Planning Courses , 2001 .

[9]  Helping students understand the relevance of social media tools to marketing practitioners: A case study of a marketing principles module , 2014 .

[10]  Bernard J. Jansen,et al.  The Google Online Marketing Challenge: Classroom Learning with Real Clients, Real Money, and Real Advertising Campaigns , 2008 .

[11]  Leyland Pitt,et al.  Is it all a game? Understanding the principles of gamification , 2015 .

[12]  Donald R. Bacon,et al.  How Fast Do Students Forget What They Learn in Consumer Behavior? A Longitudinal Study , 2006 .

[13]  Niall Piercy,et al.  Placing a Hand in the Fire , 2011 .

[14]  Amy L. Parsons,et al.  Group Projects Using Clients Versus Not Using Clients , 2009 .

[15]  R. Mayer Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. , 2004, The American psychologist.

[16]  M. Stubbs,et al.  Designing a Web-Driven Retail Marketing Simulation , 2005 .

[17]  David S. Ackerman,et al.  Effect of Type of Curriculum on Educational Outcomes and Motivation Among Marketing Students With Different Learning Styles , 2011 .

[18]  Lyle R. Wetsch,et al.  The Google online marketing challenge: A transnational comparison of classroom learning with real clients, real money, and real advertising campaigns , 2011 .

[19]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching , 2006 .

[20]  Mizuko Ito,et al.  Hanging Out, Messing Around, and Geeking Out: Kids Living and Learning with New Media , 2009 .

[21]  Robert Sroufe,et al.  MBA Program Trends and Best Practices in Teaching Sustainability: Live Project Courses. , 2011 .

[22]  Liz McDowell,et al.  Evaluating and Implementing learning Environments: A United Kingdom Experience , 2002 .

[23]  Ron T. Brown,et al.  The Google Online Marketing Challenge and Distributed Learning , 2013 .

[24]  D. Kolb,et al.  Learning Styles and Learning Spaces: Enhancing Experiential Learning in Higher Education , 2005 .

[25]  Barry Ardley,et al.  The student practitioner: Developing skills through the marketing research consultancy project , 2010 .

[26]  Horst Treiblmaier,et al.  The Google Online Marketing Challenge and Research Opportunities , 2009 .

[27]  Nick Wilton,et al.  Business graduates and management jobs: an employability match made in heaven? , 2008 .

[28]  Mark R. Young,et al.  EVALUATING EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING ACTIVITIES , 2008 .

[29]  David L. Corsun,et al.  Charting the Experiential Territory: Clarifying Definitions and Uses of Computer Simulation, Games, and Role Play , 2002 .

[30]  C. S. Green,et al.  Learning, Attentional Control, and Action Video Games , 2012, Current Biology.

[31]  John W. Rice,et al.  The Gamification of Learning and Instruction: Game-Based Methods and Strategies for Training and Education , 2012, Int. J. Gaming Comput. Mediat. Simulations.

[32]  John E. Sawyer,et al.  Exploring the learning from an enterprise simulation , 1999 .

[33]  Sven Tuzovic,et al.  THE MARKETING BLOG COMPETITION: INTEGRATING EDUCATIONAL BLOGGING AND ANALYTICS IN THE CLASSROOM , 2014 .

[34]  Qin Sun,et al.  Using Simulations in the Undergraduate Marketing Capstone Case Course , 2009 .