Leanness Achievement through People Development System in Implementing Lean Process Management

Problem Statement: Many organizations fail to unlock the infinite potential of their workforce. In that case there will be more overhead, with more layers of management, which in turn could cause slower reaction times in fast changing business. Employees should only start, run and optimize the process, even developing themselves with the aid of People Development Systems (PDS), when they are under-equipped to handle the process. Approach: This study evaluate the improvement for the degree of leanness and top management commitment possessed by the company after PDS was implemented in the Kitting Department of the aerospace company. Quantitative measures were used to document the case study. Results: Leanness and top management commitments for kitting department shows significant improvement and strong relationship with problem solving capability which lead to achievement of better Leanness level through the infrastructural investments. Conclusion: Hence, the findings suggest or even prove that successful implementation of PDS which developed and equipped employees can provide a wide array of benefits to any company, irrespective of the industry in which it operates.

[1]  Nancy L. Leech,et al.  SPSS for Introductory Statistics : Use and Interpretation, Second Edition , 2004 .

[2]  John A. Bower Statistics for food science – VI: correlation and regression (Part A) , 2000 .

[3]  R. Delbridge Life on the line in contemporary manufacturing , 1998 .

[4]  Sanjay Bhasin,et al.  Lean viewed as a philosophy , 2006 .

[5]  Bernhard Wilpert,et al.  Organizational Participation: Myth and Reality , 1998 .

[6]  Abdel Magid Hamouda,et al.  A Review of Problem Solving Capabilities in Lean Process Management , 2008 .

[7]  R. Cooper,et al.  Success factors in product innovation , 1987 .

[8]  Paul Forrester,et al.  A model for evaluating the degree of leanness of manufacturing firms , 2002 .

[9]  Miflora M. Gatchalian People empowerment: the key to TQM success , 1997 .

[10]  Sheridan J. Coakes,et al.  Analysis Without Anguish: Version 12.0 For Windows , 2007 .

[11]  John Paul MacDuffie,et al.  What makes transplants thrive: managing the transfer of “best practice” at Japanese auto plants in North America , 1999 .

[12]  Kenneth K. Boyer An assessment of managerial commitment to lean production , 1996 .

[13]  Harry Barton,et al.  Development in the learning factory: training human capital , 2001 .

[14]  J. Cutcher-Gershenfeld,et al.  Lean Thinking , 2019, Encyclopedia of Sustainable Management.

[15]  Abdel Magid Hamouda,et al.  Degree of leanness and managerial commitment in an aerospace company , 2008 .

[16]  D. Hamberg,et al.  Invention in the Industrial Research Laboratory , 1963, Journal of Political Economy.

[17]  Kazuo Koike,et al.  Understanding industrial relations in modern Japan , 1988 .

[18]  Dennis F. X. Mathaisel,et al.  Developing, implementing and transferring lean quality initiatives from the aerospace industry to all industries , 2000 .

[19]  R. Forrester,et al.  Implications of lean manufacturing for human resource strategy , 1995 .

[20]  J. D. Jong,et al.  How leaders influence employees' innovative behaviour , 2007 .

[21]  小池 和男,et al.  Understanding industrial relations in modern Japan , 1990 .

[22]  Bengt Klefsjö,et al.  The machine that changed the world , 2008 .

[23]  F. M. Andrews,et al.  SUPERVISORY PRACTICES AND INNOVATION IN SCIENTIFIC TEAMS , 1967 .

[24]  N. Anderson,et al.  Managing innovation and change : a critical guide for organizations , 2002 .

[25]  J. Worley,et al.  The role of communication and management support in a lean manufacturing implementation , 2006 .

[26]  Christer Karlsson,et al.  Change Processes Towards Lean Production: The Role of the Management Accounting System , 1996 .

[27]  John R. Grandzol,et al.  A survey instrument for standardizing TQM modeling research , 1998 .

[28]  Anders Berger,et al.  Continuous improvement: design, organisation and management , 1997 .