The role of memory consolidation in generalisation of new linguistic information

Accounts of memory that postulate complementary learning systems (CLS) have become increasingly influential in the field of language learning. These accounts predict that generalisation of newly learnt linguistic information to untrained contexts requires offline memory consolidation. Such generalisation should not be observed immediately after training, as these accounts claim unconsolidated representations are context and hippocampus-dependent and gain contextual and hippocampal independence only after consolidation. We trained participants on new affixes (e.g., -nule) attached to familiar word stems (e.g., buildnule), testing them immediately or 2days later. Participants showed an immediate advantage for trained affixes in a speeded shadowing task as long as these affixes occurred in the stem contexts in which they were learnt (e.g., buildnule). This learning effect generalised to words with untrained stems (e.g., sailnule) only in the delayed test condition. By contrast, a non-speeded definition selection task showed immediate generalisation. We propose that generalisation can be supported by initial context-dependent memories given sufficient processing time, but that context-independent lexical representations emerge only following consolidation, as predicted by CLS accounts.

[1]  G. Winocur,et al.  Memory Transformation and Systems Consolidation , 2011, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[2]  S. Goldinger Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. , 1998, Psychological review.

[3]  J. Born,et al.  Odor Cues During Slow-Wave Sleep Prompt Declarative Memory Consolidation , 2007, Science.

[4]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  The acquisition of morphological knowledge investigated through artificial language learning , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  A complementary systems account of word learning: neural and behavioural evidence , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  R. O’Reilly,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.6 No.12 December 2002 , 2022 .

[7]  Robert Stickgold,et al.  Sleep Spindle Activity is Associated with the Integration of New Memories and Existing Knowledge , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[9]  Dušica Filipović Đurđević,et al.  An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning. , 2011, Psychological review.

[10]  R. French Catastrophic Forgetting in Connectionist Networks , 2006 .

[11]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. , 1988 .

[12]  P Alvarez,et al.  Memory consolidation and the medial temporal lobe: a simple network model. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  John Algeo,et al.  Fifty years among the new words : a dictionary of neologisms, 1941-1991 , 1993 .

[14]  P. Frankland,et al.  The organization of recent and remote memories , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[15]  Kim Plunkett,et al.  The influence of consistency, frequency, and semantics on learning to read: an artificial orthography paradigm. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. , 1995, Psychological review.

[17]  M. Meeter,et al.  Tracelink: A model of consolidation and amnesia , 2005, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[18]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  "Schema Abstraction" in a Multiple-Trace Memory Model , 1986 .

[19]  D Marr,et al.  Simple memory: a theory for archicortex. , 1971, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[20]  B. McNaughton,et al.  Reactivation of hippocampal ensemble memories during sleep. , 1994, Science.

[21]  J. Born,et al.  The memory function of sleep , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[22]  Rebecca L. Gómez,et al.  Naps Promote Abstraction in Language-Learning Infants , 2006, Psychological science.

[23]  David C. Plaut,et al.  Are non-semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to lexical processing? , 2000 .

[24]  H. Nusbaum,et al.  Consolidation during sleep of perceptual learning of spoken language , 2003, Nature.

[25]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. General.