Deconvolution of Complex 1D NMR Spectra Using Objective Model Selection

Fluorine (19F) NMR has emerged as a useful tool for characterization of slow dynamics in 19F-labeled proteins. One-dimensional (1D) 19F NMR spectra of proteins can be broad, irregular and complex, due to exchange of probe nuclei between distinct electrostatic environments; and therefore cannot be deconvoluted and analyzed in an objective way using currently available software. We have developed a Python-based deconvolution program, decon1d, which uses Bayesian information criteria (BIC) to objectively determine which model (number of peaks) would most likely produce the experimentally obtained data. The method also allows for fitting of intermediate exchange spectra, which is not supported by current software in the absence of a specific kinetic model. In current methods, determination of the deconvolution model best supported by the data is done manually through comparison of residual error values, which can be time consuming and requires model selection by the user. In contrast, the BIC method used by decond1d provides a quantitative method for model comparison that penalizes for model complexity helping to prevent over-fitting of the data and allows identification of the most parsimonious model. The decon1d program is freely available as a downloadable Python script at the project website (https://github.com/hughests/decon1d/).

[1]  C. Sanders,et al.  Topology and secondary structure of the N-terminal domain of diacylglycerol kinase. , 2002, Biochemistry.

[2]  U. Günther,et al.  NMRKIN: Simulating line shapes from two-dimensional spectra of proteins upon ligand binding , 2002, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[3]  Charles R Sanders,et al.  The quiet renaissance of protein nuclear magnetic resonance. , 2013, Biochemistry.

[4]  E. L. Kovrigin NMR line shapes and multi-state binding equilibria , 2012, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[5]  Ling Peng,et al.  19F NMR: a valuable tool for studying biological events. , 2013, Chemical Society reviews.

[6]  G. Roberts Structural and Dynamic Information on Ligand Binding , 2011 .

[7]  Alex D. Bain,et al.  Chemical Exchange in NMR , 2003 .

[8]  A. D. Bain,et al.  Fitting dynamic NMR lineshapes , 2001 .

[9]  J. Keeler Understanding NMR Spectroscopy , 2005 .

[10]  J. Klein-Seetharaman,et al.  Solution 19F nuclear Overhauser effects in structural studies of the cytoplasmic domain of mammalian rhodopsin , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Travis S. Hughes,et al.  An alternate binding site for PPARγ ligands , 2014, Nature Communications.

[12]  P. Griffin,et al.  Targeting the Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-γ to Counter the Inflammatory Milieu in Obesity , 2013, Diabetes & metabolism journal.

[13]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[14]  M. J. Chalmers,et al.  Ligand and receptor dynamics contribute to the mechanism of graded PPARγ agonism. , 2012, Structure.

[15]  R. Prosser,et al.  Current applications of 19F NMR to studies of protein structure and dynamics. , 2012, Progress in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

[16]  J. W. Emsley,et al.  Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy , 1984 .

[17]  A. Raftery Bayesian Model Selection in Social Research , 1995 .

[18]  Kurt Wüthrich,et al.  Biased Signaling Pathways in β2-Adrenergic Receptor Characterized by 19F-NMR , 2012, Science.

[19]  Lu-Yun Lian,et al.  Protein NMR spectroscopy : practical techniques and applications , 2011 .

[20]  R. Dror,et al.  The role of ligands on the equilibria between functional states of a G protein-coupled receptor. , 2013, Journal of the American Chemical Society.