Revealing the Sociotechnical Complexity of Business Process Modeling - An Actor-Network Theory Approach

In the last few years, the modeling of business processes has achieved considerable popularity in organizations and academic research. However, business process modeling is often studied from either a technical or a social perspective, and as a result of this a priori fragmentation, tends to overlook the sociotechnical complexity involved in modeling projects. To overcome this problem, this paper adopts an analytical approach based on the Actor-Network Theory, and performs a case study on a process-based quality management project in a large aircraft maintenance company. The results of the case analysis show that the form and meaning of both the process models and organizational routines are negotiated by setting up sociotechnical networks in modeling projects, thus making it clear that process models and ‘non-technical’ issues co-constitute each other. In this way, the paper provides an analytical tool that can help unravel the sociotechnical complexity involved in process modeling.

[1]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  Materiality and Change: Challenges to Building Better Theory about Technology and Organizing , 2008, Inf. Organ..

[2]  Marc Berg,et al.  Guest editors' introduction: Actor-network theory and information systems. What's so special? , 2004, Inf. Technol. People.

[3]  Karen Barad.  Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter , 2003, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.

[4]  Michael X Cohen.  Reading Dewey: Reflections on the Study of Routine , 2007 .

[5]  L. Suchman.  Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions (2nd edition). , 2007 .

[6]  M. Callon.  Techno-economic Networks and Irreversibility , 1990 .

[7]  Ken Lunn,et al.  Business processes--attempts to find a definition , 2003, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[8]  M. Callon.  Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay , 1984 .

[9]  W. Orlikowski.  Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work , 2007 .

[10]  Gabrielle Durepos.  Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor‐Network‐Theory , 2008 .

[11]  Michael Hammer,et al.  Reengineering Work: Don’t Automate, Obliterate , 1990 .

[12]  S. Woolgar.  Configuring the User: The Case of Usability Trials , 1990 .

[13]  M. Feldman,et al.  Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change , 2003 .

[14]  Jan Weglarz,et al.  Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations , 1993 .

[15]  Martha S. Feldman,et al.  Designing routines: On the folly of designing artifacts, while hoping for patterns of action , 2008, Inf. Organ..

[16]  J. Law.  A Sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology, and domination , 1991 .

[17]  Marc Berg,et al.  Of Forms, Containers, and the Electronic Medical Record: Some Tools for a Sociology of the Formal , 1997 .

[18]  Madeleine Akrich,et al.  The De-scription of Technical Objects , 1992 .

[19]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[20]  Andrew Pickering,et al.  The mangle of practice : time, agency, and science , 1997 .

[21]  David Graham Wastell,et al.  The Agency of Hybrids: Overcoming the Symmetrophobic Block , 2005, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[22]  Mathias Weske,et al.  Business Process Management: Concepts, Languages, Architectures , 2007 .

[23]  Markus C. Becker.  Organizational routines: a review of the literature , 2004 .

[24]  Howard Smith,et al.  Business Process Management: The Third Wave , 2003 .

[25]  Michael Pidd,et al.  A conceptual framework for understanding business processes and business process modelling , 2000, Inf. Syst. J..

[26]  John Law,et al.  Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity , 1992 .