On the Accuracy of Group Credences

[1]  Carl G. Wagner.  Aggregating subjective probabilities: some limitative theorems , 1984, Notre Dame J. Formal Log..

[2]  C. Genest.  A Characterization Theorem for Externally Bayesian Groups , 1984 .

[3]  B. Levinstein,et al.  With All Due Respect: The Macro-Epistemology of Disagreement , 2015 .

[4]  Jaines M. Joyce.  A Nonpragmatic Vindication of Probabilism , 1998, Philosophy of Science.

[5]  A. Goldman.  The Unity of the Epistemic Virtues , 2002 .

[6]  Hannes Leitgeb,et al.  IMAGING ALL THE PEOPLE , 2016, Episteme.

[7]  Robert Laddaga,et al.  Lehrer and the consensus proposal , 1977, Synthese.

[8]  A NEW PROSPECT FOR EPISTEMIC AGGREGATION , 2013, Episteme.

[9]  C. Genest,et al.  Further evidence against independence preservation in expert judgement synthesis , 1987 .

[10]  Allan Gibbard,et al.  Rational Credence and the Value of Truth , 2006 .

[11]  R. Heesen,et al.  A Game-Theoretic Approach to Peer Disagreement , 2016 .

[12]  Richard Pettigrew,et al.  Accuracy and the Laws of Credence , 2016 .

[13]  Keith Lehrer,et al.  Probability amalgamation and the independence issue: A reply to Laddaga , 1983, Synthese.

[14]  Joseph B. Kadane,et al.  Proper Scoring Rules, Dominated Forecasts, and Coherence , 2009, Decis. Anal..

[15]  James M. Joyce.  Accuracy and Coherence: Prospects for an Alethic Epistemology of Partial Belief , 2009 .

[16]  Gregory Wheeler,et al.  Resolving Peer Disagreements Through Imprecise Probabilities , 2018 .

[17]  R. Aumann.  Agreeing to disagree. , 1976, Nature cell biology.

[18]  B. Levinstein,et al.  Leitgeb and Pettigrew on Accuracy and Updating , 2012, Philosophy of Science.

[19]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  Probabilistic Coherence and Proper Scoring Rules , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[20]  Howard Raiffa,et al.  Decision analysis: introductory lectures on choices under uncertainty. 1968. , 1969, M.D.Computing.

[21]  Sarah Moss.  Scoring Rules and Epistemic Compromise , 2011 .

[22]  David Wallace,et al.  Justifying Conditionalization: Conditionalization Maximizes Expected Epistemic Utility , 2006 .

[23]  Julia Staffel,et al.  Disagreement and Epistemic Utility-Based Compromise , 2015, J. Philos. Log..

[24]  F. Dietrich,et al.  Probabilistic Opinion Pooling , 2016 .