Pre-Service Teachers' Experiences in Learning Robotics Design and Programming

The aim of this study was to reveal pre-service teachers’ experiences in learning robotics design and programming. Data were collected from 15 pre-service teachers through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using the content analysis method. Three themes were identified in this study: Course process, professional development and teaching children. The pre-service teachers indicated that they found opportunities to learn by doing and experience, enjoyed doing robotics activities and felt in flow in this process. They also expressed that the robotics programming course positively influenced their attitudes towards programming and improved their programming skills. They emphasized the importance of keeping their intrinsic motivation high by maintaining their individual efforts to solve problems. Moreover, they made various suggestions for teaching robotics to children. Implications are discussed in terms of practices for educational robotics in teacher training, and further research directions.

[1]  K. Perreault,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2011 .

[2]  Sibel Somyürek,et al.  An effective educational tool: construction kits for fun and meaningful learning , 2015 .

[3]  Amy Eguchi,et al.  Educational Robotics for Promoting 21st Century Skills , 2014, J. Autom. Mob. Robotics Intell. Syst..

[4]  Miguel Nussbaum,et al.  Developing Cognition with Collaborative Robotic Activities , 2009, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[5]  Kevin Wedeward,et al.  Robotics in the classroom , 2003, IEEE Robotics Autom. Mag..

[6]  Michele Moro,et al.  A PBL approach using virtual and real robots (with BYOB and LEGO NXT) to teaching learning key competences and standard curricula in primary level , 2013, TEEM '13.

[7]  John Sweller,et al.  Efficiency in Learning: Evidence-Based Guidelines to Manage Cognitive Load , 2005 .

[8]  Eric Zhi-Feng Liu,et al.  An Analysis of Teacher-Student Interaction Patterns in a Robotics Course for Kindergarten Children: A Pilot Study , 2013 .

[9]  Dimitris Alimisis,et al.  Educational robotics: Open questions and new challenges , 2013 .

[10]  Emily R. Lai,et al.  Collaboration: A Literature Review , 2011 .

[11]  Kamini Jaipal-Jamani,et al.  Effect of Robotics on Elementary Preservice Teachers’ Self-Efficacy, Science Learning, and Computational Thinking , 2017 .

[12]  Lucy Avraamidou,et al.  The Use of Lego Technologies in Elementary Teacher Preparation , 2013 .

[13]  Erkki Sutinen,et al.  A Case Analysis of Creative Spiral Instruction Model and Students' Creative Problem Solving Performance in a LEGO® Robotics Course , 2009, Edutainment.

[14]  Marina Umaschi Bers,et al.  Gender differences in kindergarteners’ robotics and programming achievement , 2013 .

[15]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design: Recent Developments , 2003 .

[16]  Emanuele Menegatti,et al.  Introducing robotics to teachers and schools: experiences from the TERECoP project , 2010 .

[17]  Fabiane Barreto Vavassori Benitti,et al.  Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[18]  Memet Üçgül,et al.  History and Educational Potential of LEGO Mindstorms NXT , 2013 .

[19]  Belén Curto,et al.  Resources and features of robotics learning environments (RLEs) in Spain and Latin America , 2013, TEEM '13.

[20]  Patrick Camilleri,et al.  Minding the Gap. Proposing a Teacher Learning-Training Framework for the Integration of Robotics in Primary Schools , 2017, Informatics Educ..

[21]  Prashant Doshi,et al.  Robotics to promote elementary education pre-service teachers' STEM engagement, learning, and teaching , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[22]  Tom McKlin,et al.  Sneaking in through the back door: introducing k-12 teachers to robot programming , 2014, SIGCSE.

[23]  E. Ackermann.  Piaget ’ s Constructivism , Papert ’ s Constructionism : What ’ s the difference ? , 2001 .

[24]  Merredith Portsmore,et al.  Bringing Engineering to Elementary School , 2004 .

[25]  Bradley S. Barker,et al.  Impact of Robotics and Geospatial Technology Interventions on Youth STEM Learning and Attitudes , 2010 .

[26]  Stavros N. Demetriadis,et al.  Evaluating the Role of Collaboration Scripts as Group Guiding Tools in Activities of Educational Robotics: Conclusions from Three Case Studies , 2012, 2012 IEEE 12th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.

[27]  Eric Zhi-Feng Liu,et al.  Student Satisfaction and Self-Efficacy in a Cooperative Robotics Course , 2010 .

[28]  Moshe Barak,et al.  Robotics projects and learning concepts in science, technology and problem solving , 2009 .

[29]  Erdogan Kaya,et al.  Introducing Engineering Design to a Science Teaching Methods Course through Educational Robotics and Exploring Changes in Views of Preservice Elementary Teachers. , 2017 .

[30]  P. Coleman.  Doing case study research in psychology , 2002 .

[31]  Antoinette P. Bruciati.  Robotics Technologies for K-8 Educators: A Semiotic Approach for Instructional Design , 2004 .

[32]  Ghazi Shukur,et al.  The Effect of LEGO Training on Pupils' School Performance in Mathematics, Problem Solving Ability and Attitude: Swedish Data , 2006, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[33]  Henry Goh,et al.  ROBOTICS AS A TOOL TO STEM LEARNING , 2014 .

[34]  M. Resnick.  Sowing the Seeds for a more Creative Society , 2009, CHI 2009.

[35]  Václav Králík,et al.  Innovative Methods in Teaching Programming for Future Informatics Teachers. , 2017 .

[36]  Bernardo Wagner,et al.  The Challenges and Benefits of Using Robots in Higher Education , 2007, Intell. Autom. Soft Comput..

[37]  E. Mauch.  Using Technological Innovation to Improve the Problem-Solving Skills of Middle School Students: Educators' Experiences with the LEGO Mindstorms Robotic Invention System , 2001 .