Classification of osteoarthritic and normal knee function using three-dimensional motion analysis and the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence

In this paper, a novel object classification method is introduced and developed within a biomechanical study of human knee function in which subjects are classified to one of two groups: subjects with osteoarthritic (OA) and normal (NL) knee function. Knee-function characteristics are collected using a three-dimensional motion-analysis technique. The classification method transforms these characteristics into sets of three belief values: a level of belief that a subject has OA knee function, a level of belief that a subject has NL knee function, and an associated level of uncertainty. The evidence from each characteristic is then combined into a final set of belief values, which is used to classify subjects. The final belief values are subsequently represented on a simplex plot, which enables the classification of a subject to be represented visually. The control parameters, which are intrinsic to the classification method, can be chosen by an expert or by an optimization approach. Using a leave-one-out cross-validation approach, the classification accuracy of the proposed method is shown to compare favorably with that of a well-established classifier-linear discriminant analysis. Overall, this study introduces a visual tool that can be used to support orthopaedic surgeons when making clinical decisions.

[1]  Catherine Avril Holt,et al.  Three-dimensional analysis of the tibiofemoral joint using external marker clusters and the JCS approach - comparison of normal and osteoarthiritic knee function , 2001 .

[2]  T. Andriacchi,et al.  Increased knee joint loads during walking are present in subjects with knee osteoarthritis. , 2002, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[3]  A. Leardini,et al.  Data management in gait analysis for clinical applications. , 1998, Clinical biomechanics.

[4]  W L Wu,et al.  Potential of the back propagation neural network in the assessment of gait patterns in ankle arthrodesis. , 2000, Clinical biomechanics.

[5]  T Chau,et al.  A review of analytical techniques for gait data. Part 2: neural network and wavelet methods. , 2001, Gait & posture.

[6]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Statistical Modeling: The Two Cultures (with comments and a rejoinder by the author) , 2001 .

[7]  D W Grieve,et al.  The use of neural networks to recognize patterns of human movement: gait patterns. , 1995, Clinical biomechanics.

[8]  J. D. Childs,et al.  Alterations in lower extremity movement and muscle activation patterns in individuals with knee osteoarthritis. , 2004, Clinical biomechanics.

[9]  Lars Weidenhielm,et al.  Kinetic and kinematic characteristics of gait in patients with medial knee arthrosis , 2003, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[10]  E S Grood,et al.  A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. , 1983, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[11]  T. Andriacchi,et al.  The knee adduction moment during gait in subjects with knee osteoarthritis is more closely correlated with static alignment than radiographic disease severity, toe out angle and pain , 2002, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[12]  Robert J. Safranek,et al.  Evidence accumulation using binary frames of discernment for verification vision , 1990, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[13]  T Chau,et al.  A review of analytical techniques for gait data. Part 1: Fuzzy, statistical and fractal methods. , 2001, Gait & posture.

[14]  C. D. Gelatt,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.

[15]  Lin Lin,et al.  Identification of corporate distress in UK industrials: a conditional probability analysis approach , 2004 .

[16]  K. An,et al.  Gait characteristics of patients with knee osteoarthritis. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  Balázs Kotnyek,et al.  Application of heuristic methods for conformance test selection , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Exploring the discrimination power of the time domain for segmentation and characterization of active lesions in serial MR data , 2000, Medical Image Anal..

[19]  Casimir A. Kulikowski,et al.  Computer Systems That Learn: Classification and Prediction Methods from Statistics, Neural Nets, Machine Learning and Expert Systems , 1990 .

[20]  Glenn Shafer,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Evidence , 2020, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence.

[21]  Malcolm J. Beynon,et al.  DS/AHP method: A mathematical analysis, including an understanding of uncertainty , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[22]  Johan Schubert,et al.  Cluster-based Specification Techniques in Dempster-Shafer Theory , 1995, ECSQARU.

[23]  S. Shapiro,et al.  An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples) , 1965 .

[24]  S H Holzreiter,et al.  Assessment of gait patterns using neural networks. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  I Söderkvist,et al.  Determining the movements of the skeleton using well-configured markers. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  Said Salhi,et al.  Heuristic Search Methods , 1998 .

[27]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Statistical Modeling: The Two Cultures (with comments and a rejoinder by the author) , 2001, Statistical Science.