Prediction of mountain stream morphology

[1] We use a large and diverse data set from mountain streams around the world to explore relationships between reach-scale channel morphology and control variables. The data set includes 177 step-pool reaches, 44 plane-bed reaches, and 114 pool-riffle reaches from the western United States, Panama, and New Zealand. We performed several iterations of stepwise discriminant analysis on these data. A three-variable discriminant function using slope (S), D84, and channel width (w) produced an error rate of 24% for the entire data set. Seventy percent of plane-bed reaches were correctly classified (16% incorrectly classified as pool-riffle and 14% incorrectly classified as step-pool). Sixty-seven percent of pool-riffle channels were correctly classified (31% incorrectly classified as plane-bed and 2% as step-pool). Eighty-nine percent of step-pool reaches were correctly classified (9% incorrectly classified as plane-bed and 2% as pool-riffle). The partial R2 values and F tests indicate that S is by far the most significant single explanatory variable. Comparison of the eight discriminant functions developed using different data sets indicates that no single variable is present in all functions, suggesting that the discriminant functions are sensitive to the specific stream reaches being analyzed. However, the three-variable discriminant function developed from the entire data set correctly classified 69% of the 159 channels included in an independent validation data set. The ability to accurately classify channel type in other regions using the three-variable discriminant function developed from the entire data set has important implications for water resources management, such as facilitating prediction of channel morphology using regional S-w-D84 relations calibrated with minimal field work.

[1]  A. Chin Step pools in stream channels , 1989 .

[2]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Channel-reach morphology in mountain drainage basins , 1997 .

[3]  C. Hupp,et al.  Bank accretion and the development of vegetated depositional surfaces along modified alluvial channels , 1991 .

[4]  D. M. Thompson,et al.  Velocity characteristics along a small step–pool channel , 2000 .

[5]  Richard R. Harris Associations between stream valley geomorphology and riparian vegetation as a basis for landscape analysis in the eastern Sierra Nevada, California, USA , 1988 .

[6]  J. Bathurst Flow Resistance Estimation in Mountain Rivers , 1985 .

[7]  Richard A. Johnson,et al.  Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 1983 .

[8]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Pool Spacing in Forest Channels , 1995 .

[9]  R. Sidle,et al.  Understanding Processes and Downstream Linkages of Headwater Systems , 2002 .

[10]  M. Wolman A method of sampling coarse river‐bed material , 1954 .

[11]  L. Benda,et al.  Debris flows as agents of morphological heterogeneity at low-order confluences, Olympic Mountains, Washington , 2003 .

[12]  P. J. Whiting,et al.  Alluvial architecture in headwater streams with special emphasis on step-pool topography , 2000 .

[13]  F. Swanson,et al.  Pattern and origin of stepped-bed morphology in high-gradient streams, Western Cascades, Oregon , 1990 .

[14]  Daniel J. Miller,et al.  Effects of punctuated sediment supply on valley-floor landforms and sediment transport , 2000 .

[15]  Alan D. Howard,et al.  Long Profile Development of Bedrock Channels: Interaction of Weathering, Mass Wasting, Bed Erosion, and Sediment Transport , 2013 .

[16]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Influence of debris flows and log jams on the location of pools and alluvial channel reaches, Oregon Coast Range , 2003 .

[17]  G. Grant,et al.  Effects of wood on debris flow runout in small mountain watersheds , 2003 .

[18]  E. Wohl Limits of downstream hydraulic geometry , 2004 .

[19]  E. Wohl,et al.  Large woody debris and flow resistance in step-pool channels, Cascade Range, Washington , 2003 .

[20]  R. D. Jarrett Hydraulics of High-Gradient Streams , 1984 .

[21]  Ellen Wohl,et al.  Debris flows as geomorphic agents in the Huachuca Mountains of southeastern Arizona , 1989 .

[22]  Ellen Wohl,et al.  Channel and woody debris characteristics in adjacent burned and unburned watersheds a decade after wildfire, Park County, Wyoming , 2004 .

[23]  E. Wohl,et al.  Influence of step composition on step geometry and flow resistance in step‐pool streams of the Washington Cascades , 2003 .

[24]  Robert D. Jarrett,et al.  HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC RESEARCH IN MOUNTAIN RWERS , 1990 .

[25]  Ellen Wohl,et al.  Reach‐scale channel geometry of a mountain river , 2004 .

[26]  Ellen Wohl,et al.  Channel geometry of mountain streams in New Zealand , 2005 .

[27]  Nicole M. Gasparini,et al.  The Channel-Hillslope Integrated Landscape Development Model (CHILD) , 2001 .

[28]  Don Mitchell,et al.  The End of Public Space?People's Park, Definitions of the Public, and Democracy , 1995 .

[29]  Cliff R. Hupp,et al.  Hydrological and geomorphological impacts on riparian plant communities , 2000 .

[30]  C. Gibbins,et al.  Linking channel geomorphic characteristics to spatial patterns of spawning activity and discharge use by Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) , 2004 .

[31]  M. Fonstad Spatial variation in the power of mountain streams in the Sangre de Cristo Mountains, New Mexico , 2003 .

[32]  J. C Bathurst Environmental river flow hydraulics , 1997 .