Brawn and Brains: a Robust and Powerful approach to X-inclusive Whole-genome Association Studies

X-chromosome is often excluded from whole-genome association studies due to a number of complexities. Some are apparent, e.g. sex-specific allele frequencies, sex-gene interaction effects, and the choice of (additive or other) genetic models, while others are subtler, e.g. random, skewed or no X-inactivation, and the choice of risk allele. In this work, we aim to consider all these complexities jointly and propose a regression-based association test. We provide theoretical justifications for its robustness in the presence various aforementioned model uncertainties, as well as for its improved power under certain alternatives as compared with existing approaches. For completeness, we also revisit the autosomes and show that the proposed framework leads to a robust and sometimes much more powerful test than the standard method. Finally, we provide supporting evidence from simulation and application studies.

[1]  Gang Zheng,et al.  Testing association for markers on the X chromosome , 2007, Genetic epidemiology.

[2]  Jason H. Moore,et al.  Chapter 11: Genome-Wide Association Studies , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[3]  Andreas Ziegler,et al.  How to Include Chromosome X in Your Genome‐Wide Association Study , 2014, Genetic epidemiology.

[4]  Stephen W. Lagakos,et al.  Loss in Efficiency Caused by Omitting Covariates and Misspecifying Exposure in Logistic Regression Models , 1993 .

[5]  A. Keinan,et al.  XWAS: A Software Toolset for Genetic Data Analysis and Association Studies of the X Chromosome. , 2015, The Journal of heredity.

[6]  D. Clayton,et al.  Testing for association on the X chromosome , 2008, Biostatistics.

[7]  Wei Chen,et al.  Statistics for X‐chromosome associations , 2018, Genetic epidemiology.

[8]  W. G. Hill,et al.  Data and Theory Point to Mainly Additive Genetic Variance for Complex Traits , 2008, PLoS genetics.

[9]  Radu V. Craiu,et al.  Bayesian model averaging for the X-chromosome inactivation dilemma in genetic association study. , 2017, Biostatistics.

[10]  H. Willard,et al.  X-inactivation profile reveals extensive variability in X-linked gene expression in females , 2005, Nature.

[11]  Jian Wang,et al.  Selection of X-chromosome Inactivation Model , 2017, Cancer informatics.

[12]  Stephen W. Lagakos,et al.  Effects of Mismodeling on Tests of Association Based on Logistic Regression Models , 1992 .

[13]  Melanie Bahlo,et al.  X chromosome association testing in genome wide association studies , 2011, Genetic epidemiology.

[14]  Hon Keung Tony Ng,et al.  Detecting associated single-nucleotide polymorphisms on the X chromosome in case control genome-wide association studies , 2017, Statistical methods in medical research.

[15]  J. Neuhaus Estimation efficiency with omitted covariates in generalized linear models , 1998 .

[16]  Pantelis G Bagos,et al.  Genetic model selection in genome-wide association studies: robust methods and the use of meta-analysis , 2013, Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology.

[17]  P. Sasieni From genotypes to genes: doubling the sample size. , 1997, Biometrics.

[18]  Alon Keinan,et al.  X-inactivation informs variance-based testing for X-linked association of a quantitative trait , 2015, BMC Genomics.

[19]  T. Manolio,et al.  eXclusion: toward integrating the X chromosome in genome-wide association analyses. , 2013, American journal of human genetics.

[20]  Jian Wang,et al.  X‐Chromosome Genetic Association Test Accounting for X‐Inactivation, Skewed X‐Inactivation, and Escape from X‐Inactivation , 2014, Genetic epidemiology.

[21]  Andreas Ziegler,et al.  Association Tests for X-Chromosomal Markers – A Comparison of Different Test Statistics , 2011, Human Heredity.

[22]  D. Clayton,et al.  Sex chromosomes and genetic association studies , 2009, Genome Medicine.