Measuring efficiencies of multi-period and multi-division systems associated with DEA: An application to OECD countries' national innovation systems

We model for efficiencies of multi-period and multi-division systems by DEA.We extend Kao's (2013) formulation approach of dynamic DEA to DN-DEA.We propose a new formulating approach for dynamic network DEA (DN-DEA) models.Our formulating approach can be applicable to both radial and non-radial measures.We apply the DN-CCR model to evaluate OECD countries' innovation efficiency scores. The efficiency-oriented performance evaluation of multi-period and multi-division systems (MPMDS) becomes increasingly important for complex investment and management decisions. This paper proposes a new formulation approach for dynamic network DEA (DN-DEA) models based on system thinking to measure and decompose the overall efficiency of MPMDS. The proposed approach is general and maintains the objective property of DEA evaluation, which not only does not need the pre-specified weights to subjectively combine component efficiencies into overall efficiency, but also is applicable to both radial and non-radial measures. More attracting, it presents a weighted average decomposition of the overall efficiency score into component ones by a set of endogenous weight sets which are most favorable for the overall efficiency of the tested entire MPMDS and ensures consistency in the comparison between overall and component efficiency scores. This study makes two contributions to the existing literature. First, it not only makes the structured decision making of MPMDS possible but also helps us realize semi- and non-structural decision making from an expert and intelligent systems point of view. Second, it evaluated the innovation efficiency of OECD countries in the multi-period and multi-division context, which presents an analytical technique and some systemic evidence for national innovation investment decisions in the long run.

[1]  Chiang Kao,et al.  Efficiency decomposition in network data envelopment analysis with slacks-based measures , 2014 .

[2]  Hirofumi Fukuyama,et al.  A dynamic network DEA model with an application to Japanese Shinkin banks , 2013 .

[3]  Sohrab Kordrostami,et al.  THE DYNAMIC EECT IN PARALLEL PRODUCTION SYSTEMS; AN ILLUSTRATION WITH IRANIAN BANKS , 2013 .

[4]  Jiancheng Guan,et al.  Measuring the Efficiency of China's Regional Innovation Systems: Application of Network Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) , 2012 .

[5]  E. Wang,et al.  Relative efficiency of R&D activities: A cross-country study accounting for environmental factors in the DEA approach , 2007 .

[6]  Chiang Kao,et al.  Network data envelopment analysis: A review , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  Andrew L. Johnson,et al.  US hospital performance: A dynamic network analysis , 2013 .

[8]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[9]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  Dynamic DEA with network structure: A slacks-based measure approach , 2013 .

[10]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[11]  Jiancheng Guan,et al.  Modeling the relative efficiency of national innovation systems , 2012 .

[12]  Ming-Miin Yu,et al.  An Application of the Dynamic Network DEA Model: The Case of Banks in Taiwan , 2015 .

[13]  Sebastián Lozano,et al.  A joint-inputs Network DEA approach to production and pollution-generating technologies , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[14]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Network DEA: Additive efficiency decomposition , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  Necmi K. Avkiran,et al.  An illustration of dynamic network DEA in commercial banking including robustness tests , 2015 .

[16]  Chiang Kao,et al.  Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  K. Tone,et al.  Dynamic DEA: A slacks-based measure approach , 2010 .

[18]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  Jiancheng Guan,et al.  Measuring the innovation production process: A cross-region empirical study of China’s high-tech innovations , 2010 .

[20]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Programming with linear fractional functionals , 1962 .

[21]  Necmi Kemal Avkiran,et al.  Intertemporal analysis of organizational productivity in residential aged care networks: scenario analyses for setting policy targets , 2014, Health care management science.

[22]  Necmi K. Avkiran,et al.  DYNAMIC NETWORK RANGE-ADJUSTED MEASURE VS. DYNAMIC NETWORK SLACKS-BASED MEASURE , 2014 .

[23]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Dynamic Network DEA: An Illustration , 2009 .

[24]  Pamela Murray-Tuite,et al.  A multi-perspective dynamic network performance efficiency measurement of an evacuation: A dynamic network-DEA approach , 2016 .

[25]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  Estimation of the efficiency of Japanese hospitals using a dynamic and network data envelopment analysis model , 2014, Health care management science.

[26]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[27]  Chiang Kao,et al.  Dynamic data envelopment analysis: A relational analysis , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[28]  Hugo Hollanders,et al.  Measuring innovation efficiency , 2007 .

[29]  Mingting Kou,et al.  Staged efficiency and its determinants of regional innovation systems: a two-step analytical procedure , 2014 .

[30]  George Halkos,et al.  Modelling the effect of national culture on countries’ innovation performances: A conditional full frontier approach , 2013 .

[31]  Chiang Kao,et al.  Efficiency decomposition in network data envelopment analysis: A relational model , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[32]  Seyed Hossein Razavi Hajiagha,et al.  Multi-period data envelopment analysis based on Chebyshev inequality bounds , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..