The role of parallelism in the real-time processing of anaphora

Parallelism effects refer to the facilitated processing of a target structure when it follows a similar, parallel structure. In coordination, a parallelism-related conjunction triggers the expectation that a second conjunct with the same structure as the first conjunct should occur. It has been proposed that parallelism effects reflect the use of the first structure as a template that guides the processing of the second. In this study, we examined the role of parallelism in real-time anaphora resolution by charting activation patterns in coordinated constructions containing anaphora, Verb-Phrase Ellipsis (VPE) and Noun-Phrase Traces (NP-traces). Specifically, we hypothesised that an expectation of parallelism would incite the parser to assume a structure similar to the first conjunct in the second, anaphora-containing conjunct. The speculation of a similar structure would result in early postulation of covert anaphora. Experiment 1 confirms that following a parallelism-related conjunction, first-conjunct material is activated in the second conjunct. Experiment 2 reveals that an NP-trace in the second conjunct is posited immediately where licensed, which is earlier than previously reported in the literature. In light of our findings, we propose an intricate relation between structural expectations and anaphor resolution.

[1]  Andrew J. Stewart,et al.  Syntactic priming: Investigating the mental representation of language , 1995 .

[2]  Richard Shillcock,et al.  Cognitive models of speech processing : the Second Sperlonga Meeting , 1993 .

[3]  Thomas G. Bever,et al.  Judging the veracity of ambiguous sentences. , 1970 .

[4]  C. Clifton,et al.  Processing Elided Verb Phrases with Flawed Antecedents: the Recycling Hypothesis. , 2006, Journal of memory and language.

[5]  David M. Perlmutter Impersonal Passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis , 1978 .

[6]  Ron Smyth,et al.  Grammatical determinants of ambiguous pronoun resolution , 1994 .

[7]  D. Swinney,et al.  How left inferior frontal cortex participates in syntactic processing: Evidence from aphasia , 2008, Brain and Language.

[8]  Kristen M. Tooley,et al.  Priming in sentence comprehension: Strategic or syntactic? , 2008 .

[9]  Alexandra A. Cleland,et al.  Activation of Syntactic Information During Language Production , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[10]  Danny Fox,et al.  Economy and Semantic Interpretation , 1999 .

[11]  Matthew J Traxler,et al.  Lexically independent priming in online sentence comprehension , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[12]  D. Swinney,et al.  On the temporal course of gap-filling during comprehension of verbal passives , 1993, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[13]  Holly P Branigan,et al.  Priming prepositional-phrase attachment during comprehension. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  Arild Hestvik,et al.  Charting the time-course of VP-ellipsis sentence comprehension: Evidence for an initial and independent structural analysis. , 2003, Journal of memory and language.

[15]  M. Piñango,et al.  The role of the anterior left hemisphere in real-time sentence comprehension: Evidence from split intransitivity , 2003, Brain and Language.

[16]  David Swinney,et al.  Gap-Filling and End-of-Sentence Effects in Real-Time Language Processing: Implications for Modeling Sentence Comprehension in Aphasia , 1998, Brain and Language.

[17]  L Frazier,et al.  Processing Coordinate Structures , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[18]  Christoph Scheepers,et al.  Syntactic priming in comprehension: the role of argument order and animacy. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[19]  Christoph Scheepers,et al.  Priming ditransitive structures in comprehension , 2007, Cognitive Psychology.

[20]  Pia Knoeferle,et al.  Constituent order and semantic parallelism in online comprehension: Eye-tracking evidence from German , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[21]  Pia Knoeferle,et al.  Processing Parallel Structure: Evidence from Eye-Tracking and a Computational Model , 2007 .

[22]  Satterthwaite Fe An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. , 1946 .

[23]  M. Pickering,et al.  Structural priming: a critical review. , 2008, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  F. E. Satterthwaite An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. , 1946, Biometrics.

[25]  C. Clifton,et al.  Parallel structure: A source of facilitation in sentence comprehension , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[26]  A. Sheldon The role of parallel function in the acquisition of relative clauses in English , 1973 .

[27]  D Swinney,et al.  The role of structure in coreference assignment during sentence comprehension , 1989, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[28]  Austin F. Frank,et al.  Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R , 2010 .

[29]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Comprehension of Deep and Surface Verbphrase Anaphors , 1990 .

[30]  Matthew Walenski,et al.  Speeded processing of grammar and tool knowledge in Tourette's syndrome , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  M. Traxler,et al.  Syntactic Priming in Comprehension , 2007, Psychological science.

[32]  Tracy Love,et al.  Parallelism Effects and Verb Activation: The Sustained Reactivation Hypothesis , 2010, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[33]  Frank Wijnen,et al.  Gapping: Electrophysiological evidence for immediate processing of “missing” verbs in sentence comprehension , 2004, Brain and Language.

[34]  Michael Walsh Dickey,et al.  Comprehension of elided structure: Evidence from sluicing , 2011 .

[35]  L P Shapiro,et al.  On-line comprehension of VP-ellipsis: Syntactic reconstruction and semantic influence , 1995, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[36]  Janet Dean Fodor,et al.  Processing empty categories: A question of visibility. , 1993 .

[37]  J. Nicol Coreference processing during sentence comprehension , 1988 .

[38]  Jacques Mehler,et al.  Role of surface and base structure in the perception of sentences , 1967 .

[39]  J. Snedeker,et al.  Give and take: Syntactic priming during spoken language comprehension , 2008, Cognition.

[40]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Implicit Arguments in Sentence Processing , 1995 .

[41]  D. Swinney,et al.  The Leaf Fell (the Leaf): The Online Processing of Unaccusatives , 2008, Linguistic Inquiry.

[42]  Josée Poirier,et al.  The Real-Time Processing of Sluiced Sentences , 2010, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[43]  R. Harald Baayen,et al.  Statistics in Psycholinguistics: A critique of some current gold standards , 2004 .

[44]  Luigi Burzio,et al.  Italian Syntax: A Government-Binding Approach , 1986 .

[45]  Frank Keller,et al.  Syntactic priming in comprehension: Parallelism effects with and without coordination , 2010 .