HIS-Monitor: An approach to assess the quality of information processing in hospitals

OBJECTIVES Hospital information systems (HIS) are a substantial quality and cost factor for hospitals. Systematic monitoring of HIS quality is an important task; however, this task is often seen to be insufficiently supported. To support systematic HIS monitoring, we developed HIS-Monitor, comprising about 107 questions, focusing on how a hospital information system does efficiently support clinical and administrative tasks. METHODS The structure of HIS-Monitor consists of a matrix, crossing HIS quality criteria on one axis with a list of process steps within patient care on the other axis. HIS-Monitor was developed based on several pretests and was now tested in a larger feasibility study with 102 participants. RESULTS HIS-Monitor intends to describe strengths and weaknesses of information processing in a hospital. Results of the feasibility study show that HIS-Monitor was able to highlight certain HIS problems such as insufficiently supported cross-departmental communication, legibility of drug orders and other paper-based documents, and overall time needed for documentation. We discuss feasibility of HIS-Monitor and the reliability and validity of the results. CONCLUSIONS Further refinement and more formal validation of HIS-Monitor are planned.

[1]  H. Nohr.  Management der Informationsqualität , 2001 .

[2]  Ruth Ellen Bulger,et al.  The Institute of Medicine , 1992, JAMA.

[3]  J. Loeb,et al.  From the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. , 1995, JAMA.

[4]  R Haux,et al.  A Requirements Index for Information Processing in Hospitals , 2002, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[5]  R Roberts,et al.  Verifying quality and safety in health informatics services , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  Reza Khorramshahgol,et al.  Hospital information systems quality: a customer satisfaction assessment tool , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[7]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Information Systems for Public Sector Management Working Paper Series Why Health Care Information Systems Succeed or Fail Why Health Care Information Systems Succeed or Fail , 2022 .

[8]  Harry S. Hertz,et al.  Baldrige National Quality Program , 2002 .

[9]  Chris Sauer,et al.  Research Paper: Information Technology in Complex Health Services: Organizational Impediments to Successful Technology Transfer and Diffusion , 1997, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[10]  Martin Harris,et al.  Strategic planning for information systems , 1991, J. Inf. Technol..

[11]  Christian Nøhr,et al.  Declaration of Innsbruck. Results from the European Science Foundation Sponsored Workshop on Systematic Evaluation of Health Information Systems (HIS-EVAL), April 4-6th, 2003. , 2006, Yearbook of medical informatics.

[12]  K. Lohr,et al.  The Definition of Quality and Approaches to Its Assessment. , 1981 .

[13]  Alastair Baker,et al.  Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[14]  P. Beynon-Davies,et al.  When health information systems fail. , 1999, Topics in health information management.

[15]  John R. Krobock.  A taxonomy: Hospital information systems evaluation methodologies , 1984, Journal of Medical Systems.

[16]  E. Guba,et al.  Fourth Generation Evaluation , 1989 .

[17]  Wilhelm Hasselbring,et al.  Strategic information management plans: the basis for systematic information management in hospitals , 2001, Int. J. Medical Informatics.