Influence of the Environment on Innovation Performance of TQM

Abstract How can a firm use TQM practices for both quality performance and innovation performance? Why does the business environment have to be suitable when TQM practices are implemented, before innovation performance can be shown? This paper proposes a framework and illustrates a case study to argue that (1) TQM practice has a primary effect, in which TQM practices obtain quality performance, and a secondary effect, which leverages features extracted from TQM practices for innovation performance; (2) the secondary effect of TQM practices must have business environment changes to match claims for valuable features before innovation performance can be seen. The case study depicts how a leading global firm innovated by taking a chance on resolving a critical quality issue in TQM practices through innovation. The innovation initially had no effect on sales when the business environment was unchanged despite of marketing/sales efforts, but the innovation was a critical success after business environment changes created value for the innovation's claims. Realizing how TQM practices lead to quality and innovation performance and how the business environment is important for the dynamic process above, reminds executives to make features of innovation from TQM practices as open and scalable as possible to match emerging social demands, or to consider trends of the business environment when developing solutions in TQM practices.

[1]  Johannes Freiesleben On the Limited Value of Cost of Quality Models , 2004 .

[2]  Ahmad K. Elshennawy Quality in the New Age and the Body of Knowledge for Quality Engineers , 2004 .

[3]  Gopal K. Kanji,et al.  Can total quality management help innovation , 1996 .

[4]  R. Gulati Is Slack Good or Bad for Innovation ? , 2007 .

[5]  Thiagarajan Ravichandran,et al.  An innovation diffusion model of TQM implementation , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[6]  Shams‐ur Rahman,et al.  The Future of TQM is Past. Can TQM be Resurrected? , 2004 .

[7]  Quek Eng Eng,et al.  A survey of TQM practices in the Malaysian electrical and electronic industry , 2003 .

[8]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  CUSTOMER POWER, STRATEGIC INVESTMENT, AND THE FAILURE OF LEADING FIRMS , 1996 .

[9]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[10]  Sheng-Hsun Hsu,et al.  Knowledge management and its relationship with TQM , 2005 .

[11]  Amrik S. Sohal,et al.  TQM and innovation: a literature review and research framework , 2001 .

[12]  Barrie Dale,et al.  Quality costs: a critique of some ‘economic cost of quality’ models , 1988 .

[13]  James R. Evans,et al.  Total Quality: Management, Organization, and Strategy , 1993 .

[14]  Amrik S. Sohal,et al.  The Sustainability and Evolution of Quality Improvement Programmes – an Australian Case Study , 2004 .

[15]  Ivanka Avelini Holjevac,et al.  Total Quality Management and Business Excellence , 2007 .

[16]  Sumantra Ghoshal,et al.  The Strategy Process: Concepts, Contexts, Cases , 1991 .

[17]  Thiagarajan Ravichandran,et al.  Quality Management in Systems Development: An Organizational System Perspective , 2000, MIS Q..

[18]  John S. Oakland,et al.  Implementing business excellence , 2005 .

[19]  M. Tushman,et al.  Readings in the Management of Innovation , 1988 .

[20]  Chao-Ton Su,et al.  An empirical study of the Taiwan National Quality Award causal model , 2003 .

[21]  Mahesh Chandra Total Quality Management in Management Development , 1993 .

[22]  H. K. Tang,et al.  An integrative model of innovation in organizations , 1998 .

[23]  Renée Mauborgne,et al.  Strategy, Value Innovation, and the Knowledge Economy , 1999 .

[24]  Ebrahim Soltani,et al.  Top management: A threat or an opportunity to TQM? , 2005 .

[25]  Neil A. Morgan,et al.  Product quality alignment and business unit performance , 2001 .

[26]  Javier Merino-Díaz de Cerio,et al.  Factors relating to the adoption of quality management practices: An analysis for Spanish manufacturing firms , 2003 .

[27]  J. M. D. Cerio,et al.  Quality management practices and operational performance: Empirical evidence for Spanish industry , 2003 .

[28]  J. M. De Cerio Factors relating to the adoption of quality management practices: An analysis for Spanish manufacturing firms , 2003 .

[29]  Amrik S. Sohal,et al.  The multidimensionality of TQM practices in determining quality and innovation performance — an empirical examination , 2004 .

[30]  Thiagarajan Ravichandran,et al.  Swiftness and Intensity of Administrative Innovation Adoption: An Empirical Study of TQM in Information Systems , 2000, Decis. Sci..

[31]  Vijay Mahajan,et al.  Issues and Opportunities in New Product Development: An Introduction to the Special Issue , 1997 .

[32]  Frances M. Hill,et al.  Squaring the Circle: Managing and Measuring Organizational Performance whilst Stimulating Change and Innovation , 2004 .

[33]  Robert W. Armstrong,et al.  The management pattern of adopting tqm in hong kong companies , 2005 .

[34]  Ricky W. Griffin,et al.  Toward a Theory of Organizational Creativity , 1993 .