Frequency of Adoption of Practice Management Guidelines at Trauma Centers

Evidence-based management guidelines have been shown to improve patient outcomes, yet their utilization by trauma centers remains unknown. This study measured adoption of practice management guidelines or protocols by trauma centers. A survey of 228 trauma centers was conducted over 1 year; 55 completed the survey. Centers were classified into three groups: noncompliant, partially compliant, and compliant with adoption of management protocols. Characteristics of compliant centers were compared with those of the other two groups. Most centers were Level I (58%) not-for-profit (67%) teaching hospitals (84%) with a surgical residency (74%). One-third of centers had an accredited fellowship in surgical critical care (37%). Only one center was compliant with all 32 management protocols. Half of the centers were compliant with 14 of 32 protocols studied (range, 4 to 32). Of the 21 trauma center characteristics studied, only two were independently associated with compliant centers: use of physician extenders and daily attending rounds (both P < .0001). Adoption of management guidelines by trauma centers is inconsistent, with wide variations in practices across centers.

[1]  D. Ballard,et al.  Moving from “optimal resources” to “optimal care” at trauma centers , 2012, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery.

[2]  D. Ballard,et al.  Barriers to compliance with evidence-based care in trauma , 2012, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery.

[3]  A. Nathens,et al.  More operations, more deaths? Relationship between operative intervention rates and risk-adjusted mortality at trauma centers. , 2010, The Journal of trauma.

[4]  A. Gurses,et al.  Systems ambiguity and guideline compliance: a qualitative study of how intensive care units follow evidence-based guidelines to reduce healthcare-associated infections , 2008, Quality & Safety in Health Care.

[5]  A. Nathens,et al.  Trauma quality improvement using risk-adjusted outcomes. , 2008, The Journal of trauma.

[6]  P. Pronovost,et al.  Barriers to low tidal volume ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome: Survey development, validation, and results , 2007, Critical care medicine.

[7]  P. Pronovost,et al.  An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  Mark Mikkelsen,et al.  Underuse of lung protective ventilation: Analysis of potential factors to explain physician behavior* , 2006, Critical care medicine.

[9]  D. Needham,et al.  Ventilatory management of acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome. , 2005, JAMA.

[10]  Marcus J Schultz,et al.  Struggle for implementation of new strategies in intensive care medicine: anticoagulation, insulin, and lower tidal volumes. , 2005, Journal of critical care.

[11]  H. Fessler,et al.  Protocols for lung protective ventilation , 2005, Critical care medicine.

[12]  Paul Glasziou,et al.  Jottings , 2005, Evidence-based nursing.

[13]  C. Newgard,et al.  Hospital factors associated with splenectomy for splenic injury: a national perspective. , 2004, The Journal of trauma.

[14]  Emil H Schemitsch,et al.  Internet Versus Mailed Questionnaires: A Controlled Comparison (2) , 2004, Journal of medical Internet research.

[15]  Michael P Young,et al.  Ventilation of patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: Has new evidence changed clinical practice?* , 2004, Critical care medicine.

[16]  D. Berwick.  Disseminating innovations in health care. , 2003, JAMA.

[17]  Rodney A Hayward,et al.  Whom should we profile? Examining diabetes care practice variation among primary care providers, provider groups, and health care facilities. , 2002, Health services research.

[18]  B. Hillner,et al.  Ensuring quality cancer care by the use of clinical practice guidelines and critical pathways. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  T. Konrad,et al.  Reported response rates to mailed physician questionnaires. , 2001, Health services research.

[20]  D. Schoenfeld,et al.  Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  M. Cabana,et al.  Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. , 1999, JAMA.

[22]  J. Wennberg,et al.  Geographic variation in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction: the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project. , 1999, JAMA.

[23]  Russell S. Kirby,et al.  The Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care , 1998 .

[24]  B. Fervers,et al.  Impact of a clinical guidelines program for breast and colon cancer in a French cancer center. , 1997, JAMA.

[25]  G G Koch,et al.  The awareness-to-adherence model of the steps to clinical guideline compliance. The case of pediatric vaccine recommendations. , 1996, Medical care.

[26]  Elliott Fisher,et al.  Health Care Spending , Quality , and Outcomes More Isn ’ t Always Better , 2009 .

[27]  D. Mendelson,et al.  Evidence-based medicine in the United States--de rigueur or dream deferred? , 2005, Health affairs.

[28]  J. Gold.  The surgical care improvement project. , 2005, WMJ : official publication of the State Medical Society of Wisconsin.

[29]  V. Goel,et al.  Compliance with practice guidelines for node-negative breast cancer. , 1997, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.