Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Globalization and Monetary Policy Institute Income Differences and Prices of Tradables

This paper presents novel evidence of price discrimination, using prices of identical goods in 28 countries. I explain the observed phenomenon via non-homothetic preferences, in a model of trade with product differentiation and firm productivity heterogeneity. The model brings theory and data closer along a key dimension: it generates positively related prices of tradables and income, while preserving exporter behavior and trade flows of existing frameworks. It further captures observations that richer countries buy more per product and consume more diverse bundles. Quantitatively, the model suggests that variable markups account for 80% of the positive price-income relationship across 123 countries. members of the Trade and Development Workshop at the University of Minnesota, as well as participants at various seminars and conferences for their comments and suggestions. All remaining errors are mine. Financial support from the Graduate Research Partnership Program Fellowship is gratefully acknowledged. I am grateful to the World Bank for generously providing me with the price data from the 2005 ICP round. The views in this paper are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas or the Federal Reserve System.

[1]  Philip Sauré Bounded Love of Variety and Patterns of Trade , 2012 .

[2]  Ana Cećılia Fieler,et al.  Nonhomotheticity and Bilateral Trade: Evidence and a Quantitative Explanation , 2011 .

[3]  M. Wildenbeest,et al.  The Elasticity of Trade: Estimates and Evidence , 2011, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[4]  Marcel P. Timmer,et al.  PRODUCTIVITY CONVERGENCE ACROSS INDUSTRIES AND COUNTRIES: THE IMPORTANCE OF THEORY-BASED MEASUREMENT , 2009, Macroeconomic Dynamics.

[5]  Costas Arkolakis A Unified Theory of Firm Selection and Growth , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[6]  David Hummels,et al.  International Pricing in a Generalized Model of Ideal Variety , 2009 .

[7]  Frédéric Warzynski,et al.  Markups and Firm-Level Export Status , 2009 .

[8]  E. Verhoogen,et al.  The Quality-Complementarity Hypothesis: Theory and Evidence from Colombia , 2008, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[9]  Costas Arkolakis,et al.  Market Penetration Costs and the New Consumers Margin in International Trade , 2008, Journal of Political Economy.

[10]  Thomas Chaney,et al.  Distorted Gravity: The Intensive and Extensive Margins of International Trade , 2008 .

[11]  Mario J. Crucini,et al.  Persistence in law of one price deviations: Evidence from micro-data , 2008 .

[12]  Joseph P. Kaboski,et al.  Pricing-to-Market and the Failure of Absolute PPP , 2007 .

[13]  Erzo G. J. Luttmer Selection, Growth, and the Size Distribution of Firms , 2007 .

[14]  G. Ottaviano,et al.  Market Size, Trade, and Productivity , 2005, World Scientific Studies in International Economics.

[15]  Peter J. Klenow,et al.  The Variety and Quality of a Nation's Exports , 2005 .

[16]  Mario J. Crucini,et al.  Understanding European Real Exchange Rates , 2005 .

[17]  Marc J. Melitz,et al.  International Trade and Macroeconomic Dynamics with Heterogeneous Firms , 2004 .

[18]  Peter K. Schott Across-Product Versus Within-Product Specialization in International Trade , 2004 .

[19]  J. Eaton,et al.  Dissecting Trade: Firms, Industries, and Export Destinations , 2004 .

[20]  Peter J. Klenow,et al.  Relative Prices and Relative Prosperity , 2003 .

[21]  Frank Verboven,et al.  Market Integration and Convergence to the Law of One Price: Evidence from the European Car Market , 2001 .

[22]  Jonathan Haskel,et al.  The Law of One Price - a Case Study , 2001, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[23]  R. Feenstra,et al.  Pricing to Market, Staggered Contracts, and Real Exchange Rate Persistence , 1999 .

[24]  Frank Verboven,et al.  The Evolution of Price Dispersion in the European Car Market , 1998 .

[25]  A. Ghosh,et al.  Pricing in International Markets: Lessons from the Economist , 1994 .

[26]  Linda Hunter,et al.  The contribution of nonhomothetic preferences to trade , 1991 .

[27]  Alwyn Young,et al.  Learning by Doing and the Dynamic Effects of International Trade , 1991 .

[28]  L. F. Jackson Hierarchic Demand and the Engel Curve for Variety , 1984 .

[29]  Christian M. Broda,et al.  The Welfare Implications of Rising Price Dispersion , 2009 .

[30]  Oleksandr Movshuk International Differences in Consumer Preferences and Trade: Evidence from Multicountry, Multiproduct Data * , 2005 .

[31]  Alan M. Taylor,et al.  Working Paper Series Productivity , Tradability , and the Long-Run Price Puzzle , 2005 .

[32]  Onathan,et al.  Plants and Productivity in International Trade , 2004 .

[33]  Mario J. Crucini,et al.  Price Dispersion: The Role of Borders, Distance and Location , 2003 .

[34]  Robert C. Feenstra,et al.  A homothetic utility function for monopolistic competition models, without constant price elasticity , 2003 .

[35]  Dirk Pilat,et al.  Mark-Up Ratios in Manufacturing Industries: Estimates for 14 OECD Countries , 1996 .

[36]  J. Markusen,et al.  Per-Capita Income as a Determinant of Trade , 1986 .