The Cyclic Process Decision-Heuristic: An Application in Time-Allocation Modeling

Models of human behavior can be evaluated against a number of criteria. For example, does the model incorporate important exogenous variables, and are the predictions of the model specific enough for policy analysis? In this paper, the author addresses the decision-heuristic component of human behavior modeling. The term ‘heuristic’ refers to the process individuals follow when making a decision, and a heuristic, in the modeling sense, provides the framework for deriving mathematical expressions which link an individual's decisions to behavioral goals, exogenous factors, and other decisions. The author presents the cyclic process decision-heuristic and its application in the derivation of a mathematical model of individual time-allocation behavior in two-spouse households. The heuristic incorporates specific hypotheses concerning human motivation. A mathematical model is derived for the heuristic, which is a step-by-step process. The author presents results of applying the model to explain variation in time-budget data collected by the Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, 1975–1976.

[1]  H. Simon,et al.  Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization. , 1959 .

[2]  A. Tversky.  Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. , 1972 .

[3]  J. Dumazedier,et al.  The use of time: daily activities of urban and suburban populations in twelve countries , 1975 .

[4]  Dagfinn Ås,et al.  Studies of Time-Use: Problems and Prospects: , 1978 .

[5]  Jacob Hornik,et al.  The Use of Time: An Integrated Conceptual Model , 1981 .

[6]  Gerald A. Gutenschwager,et al.  The Time-Budget—Activity Systems Perspective in Urban Research and Planning , 1973 .

[7]  Gary S. Becker,et al.  The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. , 1978 .

[8]  James R. Patrick.  Problems of Neurosis. , .

[9]  Paul N. Courant,et al.  Social accounting and social indicators: A frame-work for the analysis of well-being , 1979 .

[10]  A. Maslow.  Motivation and Personality , 1954 .

[11]  Salvatore R. Maddi,et al.  Personality Theories: A Comparative Analysis , 1976 .

[12]  Takeshi Amemiya,et al.  The Estimation of a Simultaneous-Equation Tobit Model , 1979 .

[13]  O. Svenson.  Process descriptions of decision making. , 1979 .

[14]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[15]  Ola Svenson,et al.  On decision rules and information processing strategies for choices among multiattribute alternatives , 1976 .

[16]  D Damm,et al.  A Theory of Activity Scheduling Behavior , 1981 .

[17]  C. Neil Bull,et al.  Prediction of Future Daily Behaviors: An Empirical Measure of Leisure , 1972 .

[18]  F. Thomas Juster,et al.  Constraints and complementarities in time use , 1980 .

[19]  Jerry A. Hausman,et al.  Individual Discount Rates and the Purchase and Utilization of Energy-Using Durables , 1979 .

[20]  Elizabeth C. Hirschman,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[21]  H. Murray.  Explorations in personality : a clinical and experimental study of fifty men of college age , 1939 .

[22]  H. Simon,et al.  Rational Decision Making in Business Organizations , 1978 .

[23]  R. Pollak,et al.  The Relevance of the Household Production Function and Its Implications for the Allocation of Time , 1975, Journal of Political Economy.

[24]  Bruce Tonn,et al.  A Sociopsychological Contribution to the Theory of Individual Time-Allocation , 1984 .

[25]  U. Himmelstrand,et al.  ‘Middle Way’ Sweden at a Cross-Road: Problems, Actors, and Outcomes * , 1978 .