Beam characterisation of the 1.5 T MRI-linac

As a prerequisite for clinical treatments it was necessary to characterize the Elekta 1.5 T MRI-linac 7 MV FFF radiation beam. Following acceptance testing, beam characterization data were acquired with Semiflex 3D (PTW 31021), microDiamond (PTW 60019), and Farmer-type (PTW 30013 and IBA FC65-G) detectors in an Elekta 3D scanning water phantom and a PTW 1D water phantom. EBT3 Gafchromic film and ion chamber measurements in a buildup cap were also used. Special consideration was given to scan offsets, detector effective points of measurement and avoiding air gaps. Machine performance has been verified and the system satisfied the relevant beam requirements of IEC60976. Beam data were acquired for field sizes between 1  ×  1 and 57  ×  22 cm2. New techniques were developed to measure percentage depth dose (PDD) curves including the electron return effect at beam exit, which exhibits an electron-type practical range of 1.2 ± 0.1 cm. The Lorentz force acting on the secondary charged particles creates an asymmetry in the crossline profiles with an average shift of  +0.24 cm. For a 10  ×  10 cm2 beam, scatter from the cryostat contributes 1% of the dose at isocentre. This affects the relative output factors, scatter factors and beam profiles, both in-field and out-of-field. The average 20%-80% penumbral width measured for small fields with a microDiamond detector at 10 cm depth is 0.50 cm. MRI-linac penumbral widths are very similar to that of the Elekta Agility linac MLC, as is the near-surface dose PDD(0.2 cm)  =  57%. The entrance surface dose is  ∼36% of Dmax. Cryostat transmission is quantified for inclusion within the treatment planning system. As a result, the 1.5 T MRI-linac 7 MV FFF beam has been characterised for the first time and is suitable for clinical use. This was a key step towards the first clinical treatments with the MRI-linac, which were delivered at University Medical Center Utrecht in May 2017 (Raaymakers et al 2017 Phys. Med. Biol. 62 L41-50).

[1]  G. Sawakuchi,et al.  Monte Carlo study of the chamber‐phantom air gap effect in a magnetic field , 2017, Medical physics.

[2]  Jan J W Lagendijk,et al.  The magnetic resonance imaging-linac system. , 2014, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[3]  J. Lagendijk,et al.  Performance of a PTW 60019 microDiamond detector in a 1.5 T MRI-linac , 2018, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  A. Sahgal,et al.  Magnetic field dose effects on different radiation beam geometries for hypofractionated partial breast irradiation , 2017, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[5]  A Fogliata,et al.  Definition of parameters for quality assurance of flattening filter free (FFF) photon beams in radiation therapy. , 2012, Medical physics.

[6]  D. Rogers,et al.  AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams. , 1999, Medical physics.

[8]  D. Rogers,et al.  Sensitive volume effects on Monte Carlo calculated ion chamber response in magnetic fields , 2017, Medical physics.

[9]  B W Raaymakers,et al.  Integrating a MRI scanner with a 6 MV radiotherapy accelerator: dose increase at tissue–air interfaces in a lateral magnetic field due to returning electrons , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  Uulke A van der Heide,et al.  An accurate calibration method of the multileaf collimator valid for conformal and intensity modulated radiation treatments. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  P. Andreo,et al.  Absorbed Dose Determination in External Beam Radiotherapy: An International Code of Practice for Dosimetry based on Standards of Absorbed Dose to Water , 2001 .

[12]  B W Raaymakers,et al.  Towards reference dosimetry for the MR-linac: magnetic field correction of the ionization chamber reading , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  A N T J Kotte,et al.  First patients treated with a 1.5 T MRI-Linac: clinical proof of concept of a high-precision, high-field MRI guided radiotherapy treatment , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  G. Ibbott,et al.  Reference dosimetry in magnetic fields: formalism and ionization chamber correction factors. , 2016, Medical physics.

[15]  J G M Kok,et al.  Integrating a 1.5 T MRI scanner with a 6 MV accelerator: proof of concept , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  J. Wolthaus,et al.  TH-CD-BRA-03: Direct Measurement of Magnetic Field Correction Factors, KQB, for Application in Future Codes of Practice for Reference Dosimetry. , 2016, Medical physics.

[17]  B W Raaymakers,et al.  Dosimetry for the MRI accelerator: the impact of a magnetic field on the response of a Farmer NE2571 ionization chamber , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  J. Lagendijk,et al.  Minimizing the magnetic field effect in MR-linac specific QA-tests: the use of electron dense materials , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  K. Smit,et al.  Relative dosimetry in a 1.5 T magnetic field: an MR-linac compatible prototype scanning water phantom , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  C P Karger,et al.  Radiation dosimetry in magnetic fields with Farmer-type ionization chambers: determination of magnetic field correction factors for different magnetic field strengths and field orientations , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  Mark Hardy,et al.  IPEM topical report 1: guidance on implementing flattening filter free (FFF) radiotherapy , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  S. Rathee,et al.  Dose response of selected ion chambers in applied homogeneous transverse and longitudinal magnetic fields. , 2013, Medical physics.

[23]  Jan J W Lagendijk,et al.  MR-guided breast radiotherapy: feasibility and magnetic-field impact on skin dose , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.