Comparative life cycle analysis of producing charcoal from bamboo, teak, and acacia species in Ghana

Background, aim, and scopeThe rise in wood fuel consumption, particularly of charcoal, has been associated with increased deforestation in Ghana. Plantation developments from teak (Tectona grandis), bamboo (Bambusa balcooa), and Acacia auriculiformis are now being promoted to produce sustainable biomass for charcoal production. While all species have comparable charcoal quality, there is limited available data to elucidate the environmental impacts associated with their plantation development and use as biomass sources for producing charcoal. Therefore, this study quantified and compared the cradle-to-gate environmental impacts of producing charcoal from T. grandis, A. auriculiformis, and B. balcooa.MethodsThe study was conducted in accordance with ISO 14040/14044, an international procedural framework for performing life cycle analysis (LCA). For this study, the functional unit of charcoal used was 1 MJ energy produced from three species: T. grandis, A. auriculiformis, and B. balcooa. Data on B. balcooa plantations was collected from a B. balcooa-based intercropping system set up by the International Network for Bamboo and Rattan in Sekyere Central District, Ghana. Input data for A. auriculiformis and T. grandis came from the Forestry Commission of Ghana plantations established within the forest agroecological zone of Ghana. All input data came from primary local sources. Pollutant emissions were also calculated in order to analyze the contribution of all the flow processes to the emissions. The analysis used Simapro version 8, as well as life cycle inventory (LCI) databases of Ecoinvent V3 and Idemat 2015 (a database developed by Delft University of Technology, the Netherlands). The emissions were expressed as eco-costs and used as indicators in an impact assessment.Results and discussionThe results showed that relative to B. balcooa, the total eco-cost (comprising of human health, ecosystem, resource depletion, and global warming eco-costs) of a cradle-to-gate production of 1 MJ of charcoal will be 140% higher with T. grandis and 113% higher with A. auriculiformis. The increased environmental impacts associated with T. grandis and A. auriculiformis occurred at their biomass production stage. As these species use comparatively large quantities of pesticides, weedicides, and fertilizers with high acidification, ozone depletion, and global warming potentials, their biomass production stage accounted for approximately 85% of their total eco-cost.ConclusionsThe study results suggest that B. balcooa plantations are the most environmentally viable option. In cases where T. grandis or A. auriculiformis plantations are widespread, improvement options at the biomass production stage are required in order to reduce their environmental costs.

[1]  國合會系統管理者 Global Forest Resources Assessment , 2016 .

[2]  Wale,et al.  Commercial Charcoal Production and Sustainable Community Development of the Upper West Region , Ghana , 2012 .

[3]  Joost G. Vogtländer,et al.  Bamboo : a sustainable solution for Western Europe design cases, LCAs and Land-use , 2009 .

[4]  Joost G. Vogtländer,et al.  The sustainability of bamboo products for local and Western European applications. LCAs and land-use , 2010 .

[5]  J. A. Fuwape,et al.  Charcoal and fuel value of agroforestry tree crops , 1993, Agroforestry Systems.

[6]  Bd Obiri,et al.  Towards A Sustainable Development Of The Bamboo Industry In Ghana , 2010 .

[7]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[8]  T. Moore,et al.  Carbon storage of harvest-age teak (Tectona grandis) plantations, Panama , 2003 .

[9]  P. Shanmughavel,et al.  Biomass and nutrient cycling in bamboo (Bambusa bambos) plantations of tropical areas , 1996, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[10]  K. Singh,et al.  Biomass and net production of teak plantations in a dry tropical region in India , 1992 .

[11]  Augustine Ntiamoah,et al.  Environmental impacts of cocoa production and processing in Ghana: life cycle assessment approach , 2008 .

[12]  O. Amponsah,et al.  Commercial Charcoal Production and Sustainable Community Development of the Upper West Region, Ghana , 2012 .

[13]  Erkki Tomppo,et al.  A report to the food and agriculture organization of the united nations (FAO) in support of sampling study for National Forestry Resources Monitoring and Assessment (NAFORMA) in Tanzania , 2010 .

[14]  N. Labbe,et al.  Enhancing the combustible properties of bamboo by torrefaction. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[15]  J. Fernández-Moya,et al.  Forest nutrition and fertilization in teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) plantations in Central America† , 2014, New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science.

[16]  Frank Brentrup,et al.  Methods to estimate on-field nitrogen emissions from crop production as an input to LCA studies in the agricultural sector , 2000 .

[17]  J. Lammel,et al.  Environmental impact assessment of agricultural production systems using the life cycle assessment methodology: I. Theoretical concept of a LCA method tailored to crop production , 2004 .

[18]  M. Hauschild,et al.  Estimation of pesticide emissions for LCA of agricultural products , 2002 .

[19]  Ramni Jamnadass,et al.  Agroforestree Database: a tree reference and selection guide. Version 4. , 2009 .