Occupancy estimation and the closure assumption

Summary 1.  Recent advances in occupancy estimation that adjust for imperfect detection have provided substantial improvements over traditional approaches and are receiving considerable use in applied ecology. To estimate and adjust for detectability, occupancy modelling requires multiple surveys at a site and requires the assumption of ‘closure’ between surveys, i.e. no changes in occupancy between surveys. Violations of this assumption could bias parameter estimates; however, little work has assessed model sensitivity to violations of this assumption or how commonly such violations occur in nature. 2.  We apply a modelling procedure that can test for closure to two avian point-count data sets in Montana and New Hampshire, USA, that exemplify time-scales at which closure is often assumed. These data sets illustrate different sampling designs that allow testing for closure but are currently rarely employed in field investigations. Using a simulation study, we then evaluate the sensitivity of parameter estimates to changes in site occupancy and evaluate a power analysis developed for sampling designs that is aimed at limiting the likelihood of closure. 3.  Application of our approach to point-count data indicates that habitats may frequently be open to changes in site occupancy at time-scales typical of many occupancy investigations, with 71% and 100% of species investigated in Montana and New Hampshire respectively, showing violation of closure across time periods of 3 weeks and 8 days respectively. 4.  Simulations suggest that models assuming closure are sensitive to changes in occupancy. Power analyses further suggest that the modelling procedure we apply can effectively test for closure. 5.  Synthesis and applications. Our demonstration that sites may be open to changes in site occupancy over time-scales typical of many occupancy investigations, combined with the sensitivity of models to violations of the closure assumption, highlights the importance of properly addressing the closure assumption in both sampling designs and analysis. Furthermore, inappropriately applying closed models could have negative consequences when monitoring rare or declining species for conservation and management decisions, because violations of closure typically lead to overestimates of the probability of occurrence.

[1]  Matthew G. Betts,et al.  Dynamic occupancy models reveal within-breeding season movement up a habitat quality gradient by a migratory songbird , 2008 .

[2]  A. F. O'connell,et al.  Multi-scale occupancy estimation and modelling using multiple detection methods , 2008 .

[3]  Jeffery W. Walk,et al.  RENESTING DECISIONS AND ANNUAL FECUNDITY OF FEMALE DICKCISSELS (SPIZA AMERICANA) IN ILLINOIS , 2004 .

[4]  Howard B. Stauffer,et al.  RANKING HABITAT FOR MARBLED MURRELETS: NEW CONSERVATION APPROACH FOR SPECIES WITH UNCERTAIN DETECTION , 2004 .

[5]  Hugh P Possingham,et al.  Zero tolerance ecology: improving ecological inference by modelling the source of zero observations. , 2005, Ecology letters.

[6]  L. Ball,et al.  AN OCCUPANCY MODELING APPROACH TO EVALUATING A PALM SPRINGS GROUND SQUIRREL HABITAT MODEL , 2005 .

[7]  James E. Hines,et al.  ESTIMATING TEMPORARY EMIGRATION USING CAPTURE-RECAPTURE DATA WITH POLLOCK'S ROBUST DESIGN , 1997 .

[8]  R. Swihart,et al.  Absent or undetected? Effects of non-detection of species occurrence on wildlife-habitat models , 2004 .

[9]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Hierarchical Modeling and Inference in Ecology: The Analysis of Data from Populations, Metapopulations and Communities , 2008 .

[10]  H. Possingham,et al.  IMPROVING PRECISION AND REDUCING BIAS IN BIOLOGICAL SURVEYS: ESTIMATING FALSE‐NEGATIVE ERROR RATES , 2003 .

[11]  M. R. Fuller,et al.  Estimation of the proportion of an area occupied by an animal species , 1986 .

[12]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  ESTIMATING SITE OCCUPANCY RATES WHEN DETECTION PROBABILITIES ARE LESS THAN ONE , 2002, Ecology.

[13]  Jeff Bowman,et al.  Is dispersal distance of birds proportional to territory size , 2003 .

[14]  Darryl I. MacKenzie,et al.  Designing occupancy studies: general advice and allocating survey effort , 2005 .

[15]  William A Link,et al.  Model weights and the foundations of multimodel inference. , 2006, Ecology.

[16]  K. Liang,et al.  Asymptotic Properties of Maximum Likelihood Estimators and Likelihood Ratio Tests under Nonstandard Conditions , 1987 .

[17]  I. Hanski.  A Practical Model of Metapopulation Dynamics , 1994 .

[18]  R. Fletcher,et al.  Critical Demographic Parameters for Declining Songbirds Breeding in Restored Grasslands , 2006 .

[19]  K. Pollock.  A Capture-Recapture Design Robust to Unequal Probability of Capture , 1982 .

[20]  William L. Kendall,et al.  ROBUSTNESS OF CLOSED CAPTURE-RECAPTURE METHODS TO VIOLATIONS OF THE CLOSURE ASSUMPTION , 1999 .

[21]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Species richness and occupancy estimation in communities subject to temporary emigration. , 2009, Ecology.

[22]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Implications of empirical data quality to metapopulation model parameter estimation and application , 2002 .

[23]  J. Nichols,et al.  ESTIMATING SITE OCCUPANCY, COLONIZATION, AND LOCAL EXTINCTION WHEN A SPECIES IS DETECTED IMPERFECTLY , 2003 .

[24]  David M Marsh,et al.  Current Trends in Plant and Animal Population Monitoring , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[25]  Sverre Klemp.  Altitudinal dispersal within the breeding season in the Grey Wagtail Motacilla cinerea: Altitudinal dispersal in breeding Grey Wagtails , 2003 .

[26]  Darryl I. MacKenzie,et al.  Assessing the fit of site-occupancy models , 2004 .

[27]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  Making better biogeographical predictions of species’ distributions , 2006 .

[28]  N. Yoccoz.  Occupancy Estimation and Modeling. Inferring patterns and dynamics of species occurrence , 2006 .

[29]  Robert J. Fletcher,et al.  Partitioning the multi-scale effects of human activity on the occurrence of riparian forest birds , 2008, Landscape Ecology.

[30]  D. MacKenzie.  Occupancy Estimation and Modeling: Inferring Patterns and Dynamics of Species Occurrence , 2005 .

[31]  Barry R. Noon,et al.  Estimating the occupancy of spotted owl habitat areas by sampling and adjusting for bias , 1990 .

[32]  K. Pollock,et al.  ESTIMATING SITE OCCUPANCY AND SPECIES DETECTION PROBABILITY PARAMETERS FOR TERRESTRIAL SALAMANDERS , 2004 .