Prediction and analysis of GBAS integrity monitoring availability at LinZhi airport

Prediction and analysis of GBAS integrity monitoring is important, especially at the airports where a GBAS station it to be installed. Based on existing standard documents and published research, we present a software tool for GBAS availability prediction. Simulations have been conducted that include single point, single approach path, and multiple repetitions of a same approach path in order to analyze the availability of GNSS signal integrity monitoring with a GBAS at LinZhi airport. The results show that the long-term 24-h service availability figure at two typical single points along the approach path for GBAS Approach Service Type C (GAST C) is above 99.999 % for each point, and for GBAS Approach Service Type D (GAST D) at three typical single points, it is lower than 99.8 % for each point. The unavailability percentage over a 24-h period is 0.76 and 2.40 % for GAST C and GAST D, respectively. The results of sensitivity tests show that the impact of the mask angle and the latitude on the GBAS availability at LinZhi airport are more important than that of the constellation. Our conclusions could also be of interest for the implementation of GBAS stations at other plateau airports.

[1]  Jiyun Lee,et al.  Ephemeris Protection Level Equations and Monitor Algorithms for GBAS , 2001 .

[2]  F. V. Graas,et al.  Statistical characterization of composite protection levels for GPS , 2011 .

[3]  Curtis A. Shively,et al.  Availability Enhancements for CAT IIIb LAAS , 2003 .

[4]  Thomas Dautermann,et al.  Approach service type D evaluation of the DLR GBAS testbed , 2011, GPS Solutions.

[5]  Rtca . Sc,et al.  Minimum operational performance standards for GPS local area augmentation system airborne equipment , 2000 .

[6]  Per Enge,et al.  Integrity Design and Updated Test Results for the Stanford LAAS Integrity Monitor Testbed , 2001 .

[7]  J. McDonald,et al.  Benefits of tightly coupled GPS/IRS for RNP operations in terrain challenged airports , 2008, 2008 IEEE/ION Position, Location and Navigation Symposium.

[8]  M. Harris,et al.  Geometry Screening for GBAS to Meet CAT III Integrity and Continuity Requirements , 2007 .

[9]  Curtis A. Shively,et al.  Availability of GAST D GBAS Considering Continuity of Airborne Monitors , 2010 .

[10]  Frank van Graas,et al.  Approximations to composite GPS protection levels for aircraft precision approach and landing , 2011 .

[11]  Curtis A. Shively Satellite Criticality Concepts for Unavailability and Unreliability of GNSS Satellite Navigation , 1993 .

[12]  Curtis A. Shively GBAS GAST-D (CAT IIIB) Aircraft Monitor Performance Requirements for Single Referene Receiver Faults , 2009 .

[13]  C. Macabiau,et al.  GBAS NSE model for CAT II/III autoland simulations , 2010, IEEE/ION Position, Location and Navigation Symposium.