The behavior of epidemics under bounded susceptibility

We investigate the sensitivity of epidemic behavior to a bounded susceptibility constraint -- susceptible nodes are infected by their neighbors via the regular SI/SIS dynamics, but subject to a cap on the infection rate. Such a constraint is motivated by modern social networks, wherein messages are broadcast to all neighbors, but attention spans are limited. Bounded susceptibility also arises in distributed computing applications with download bandwidth constraints, and in human epidemics under quarantine policies. Network epidemics have been extensively studied in literature; prior work characterizes the graph structures required to ensure fast spreading under the SI dynamics, and long lifetime under the SIS dynamics. In particular, these conditions turn out to be meaningful for two classes of networks of practical relevance -- dense, uniform (i.e., clique-like) graphs, and sparse, structured (i.e., star-like) graphs. We show that bounded susceptibility has a surprising impact on epidemic behavior in these graph families. For the SI dynamics, bounded susceptibility has no effect on star-like networks, but dramatically alters the spreading time in clique-like networks. In contrast, for the SIS dynamics, clique-like networks are unaffected, but star-like networks exhibit a sharp change in extinction times under bounded susceptibility. Our findings are useful for the design of disease-resistant networks and infrastructure networks. More generally, they show that results for existing epidemic models are sensitive to modeling assumptions in non-intuitive ways, and suggest caution in directly using these as guidelines for real systems.

[1]  Jeffrey O. Kephart,et al.  Directed-graph epidemiological models of computer viruses , 1991, Proceedings. 1991 IEEE Computer Society Symposium on Research in Security and Privacy.

[2]  P. Kaye Infectious diseases of humans: Dynamics and control , 1993 .

[3]  Yuval Peres,et al.  Tree-indexed random walks on groups and first passage percolation , 1994 .

[4]  T. Liggett,et al.  Stochastic Interacting Systems: Contact, Voter and Exclusion Processes , 1999 .

[5]  John Odentrantz,et al.  Markov Chains: Gibbs Fields, Monte Carlo Simulation, and Queues , 2000, Technometrics.

[6]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  Epidemic dynamics in finite size scale-free networks. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[7]  F. Chung,et al.  Eigenvalues of Random Power law Graphs , 2003 .

[8]  Harry Kesten,et al.  First-Passage Percolation , 2003 .

[9]  Anne-Marie Kermarrec,et al.  Epidemic information dissemination in distributed systems , 2004, Computer.

[10]  Anne-Marie Kermarrec,et al.  From Epidemics to Distributed Computing , 2004 .

[11]  Amin Saberi,et al.  On the spread of viruses on the internet , 2005, SODA '05.

[12]  Donald F. Towsley,et al.  The effect of network topology on the spread of epidemics , 2005, Proceedings IEEE 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies..

[13]  Laurent Massoulié,et al.  Thresholds for virus spread on networks , 2006, valuetools '06.

[14]  Rick Durrett,et al.  Random Graph Dynamics (Cambridge Series in Statistical and Probabilistic Mathematics) , 2006 .

[15]  Laurent Massoulié,et al.  Gossiping With Multiple Messages , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[16]  Michalis Faloutsos,et al.  Information Survival Threshold in Sensor and P2P Networks , 2007, IEEE INFOCOM 2007 - 26th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[17]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  The dynamics of viral marketing , 2005, EC '06.

[18]  R. Durrett Random Graph Dynamics: References , 2006 .

[19]  Yves Dallery,et al.  Moments of first passage times in general birth–death processes , 2008, Math. Methods Oper. Res..

[20]  Marc Lelarge,et al.  Efficient control of epidemics over random networks , 2009, SIGMETRICS '09.

[21]  Devavrat Shah,et al.  Gossip Algorithms , 2009, Found. Trends Netw..

[22]  C. Watkins,et al.  The spread of awareness and its impact on epidemic outbreaks , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Devavrat Shah Network gossip algorithms , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[24]  Amin Saberi,et al.  How to distribute antidote to control epidemics , 2010, Random Struct. Algorithms.

[25]  Ilkka Norros,et al.  Large Cliques in a Power-Law Random Graph , 2009, Journal of Applied Probability.

[26]  Moez Draief,et al.  Epidemics and Rumours in Complex Networks , 2010 .

[27]  Remco van der Hofstad,et al.  First Passage Percolation on the Erdős–Rényi Random Graph , 2010, Combinatorics, Probability and Computing.

[28]  A. Vespignani,et al.  Competition among memes in a world with limited attention , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[29]  Svante Janson,et al.  Majority bootstrap percolation on the random graph G(n,p) , 2010, 1012.3535.

[30]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  How Visibility and Divided Attention Constrain Social Contagion , 2012, 2012 International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2012 International Confernece on Social Computing.

[31]  Michael Small,et al.  The impact of awareness on epidemic spreading in networks , 2012, Chaos.

[32]  Aditya Gopalan,et al.  Epidemic Spreading With External Agents , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[33]  Sanjay Shakkottai,et al.  Epidemic thresholds with external agents , 2013, IEEE INFOCOM 2014 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications.