Offside decision making of assistant referees in the English Premier League: Impact of physical and perceptual-cognitive factors on match performance

Abstract In the present study, we investigated the accuracy of offside judgements of assistant referees in the English Premier League. The moment in the match, the position and movement speed of the assistant referee, attacker and second-last defender, together with the angle of view for the assistant referee were all considered to underlie incorrect decisions. The error rate was 17.5% (868 of 4960 situations). As the English assistant referees tended not to signal in doubtful situations (c = 0.91), there was an overall bias towards non-flag errors (773 non-flag errors vs. 95 flag errors). The flash-lag hypothesis could explain all flag errors, whereas the optical-error hypothesis could explain a proportion of the non-flag errors (45.4%). Fatigue, movement speed, and angle of view did not have a detrimental effect on offside decision making. In conclusion, there were fewer flag errors than in the 2002 and 2006 FIFA World Cups, whereas the number of non-flag errors rose. The increased awareness of factors involved in offside decision making and the instructions to give the benefit of the doubt to attackers could have contributed to this situation.

[1]  Francisco Belda Maruenda,et al.  Can the human eye detect an offside position during a football match? , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Offside decision making in the 2002 and 2006 FIFA World Cups , 2010, Journal of sports sciences.

[3]  Peter J. Beek,et al.  Errors in judging ‘offside’ in football , 2000, Nature.

[4]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[5]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Interpretation and application of the offside law by expert assistant referees: Perception of spatial positions in complex dynamic events on and off the field , 2009, Journal of sports sciences.

[6]  George Gretton,et al.  The Laws of the Game , 2012 .

[7]  Edgard Morya,et al.  Flag Errors in Soccer Games: The Flash-Lag Effect Brought to Real Life , 2002, Perception.

[8]  Werner Helsen,et al.  Errors in judging “offside” in association football: Test of the optical error versus the perceptual flash-lag hypothesis , 2006, Journal of sports sciences.

[9]  Di Salvo Valter,et al.  Validation of Prozone ®: A new video-based performance analysis system , 2006 .

[10]  B. Abernethy,et al.  The relationship between expertise and visual search strategy in a racquet sport , 1987 .

[11]  Matthew Weston,et al.  Analysis of physical match performance in English Premier League soccer referees with particular reference to first half and player work rates. , 2007, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[12]  J. Sanabria,et al.  Oculomotor movements and football's Law 11 , 1998, The Lancet.

[13]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Offside decisions by expert assistant referees in association football: Perception and recall of spatial positions in complex dynamic events. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[14]  Peter Krustrup,et al.  Activity profile and physiological demands of top-class soccer assistant refereeing in relation to training status , 2002, Journal of sports sciences.

[15]  Peter J. Beek,et al.  How position and motion of expert assistant referees in soccer relate to the quality of their offside judgements during actual match play , 2005 .

[16]  A. Williams,et al.  Training Perceptual Skill in Field Hockey: Is There Transfer from the Laboratory to the Field? , 2003, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[17]  Werner Helsen,et al.  Physical and perceptual-cognitive demands of top-class refereeing in association football , 2004, Journal of sports sciences.

[18]  Carlotte Kiekens,et al.  Comparison of the Effect of Two Driving Retraining Programs on On-Road Performance After Stroke , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[19]  C. Castagna,et al.  Variation in top level soccer match performance. , 2007, International journal of sports medicine.