Ambidexterity of employees: the role of empowerment and knowledge sharing

Purpose The aim of this study is to empirically test the link between employee ambidexterity and two supportive organizational cultures, namely, a perceived culture of empowerment and a knowledge-sharing culture. Furthermore, the paper addresses the mechanisms through which these supportive organizational cultures work to enable employees to engage in ambidextrous behaviour. Specifically, the role of intrinsic motivation is investigated. Design/methodology/approach Data were obtained from 136 managers employed in the five main Belgian service sectors. Findings The findings indicate that a perceived culture of empowerment is positively related to intrinsic motivation, which in turn facilitates employee ambidexterity. Also, a moderating effect of extrinsic motivation on employee ambidextrous behaviour is found. At the same time, a perceived knowledge-sharing culture is having no effect on ambidexterity or intrinsic motivation. Research limitations/implications Insights into the roles of individuals in achieving ambidexterity help to advance the theoretical understanding of how a supportive organizational context may enhance employee ambidexterity. Originality/value Despite the growing body of research on antecedents of ambidexterity, there is still lack of thorough understanding of how a supportive organizational context may enhance employee ambidexterity and the roles of individuals in achieving ambidexterity. This is one of the first studies that investigate these factors in relation to individual level ambidexterity (as opposed to organization level ambidexterity).

[1]  Marylène Gagné,et al.  The Multidimensional Work Motivation Scale: Validation evidence in seven languages and nine countries , 2015 .

[2]  L. Rabbiosi,et al.  Linking HRM and knowledge transfer via individual‐level mechanisms , 2012 .

[3]  David A. Nadler,et al.  Organizing for Innovation , 1986 .

[4]  Isabel M. Prieto,et al.  Building ambidexterity: The role of human resource practices in the performance of firms from Spain , 2012 .

[5]  M. Bauer.  Exchange And Power In Social Life , 2016 .

[6]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[7]  M. Hogg,et al.  Leadership, self, and identity: A review and research agenda , 2004 .

[8]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Inner work life: understanding the subtext of business performance , 2007, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[9]  Jeremy Holland,et al.  From analysis to implementation , 2020, Multi-dimensional Review of Viet Nam.

[10]  B. Frey,et al.  Motivation Crowding Theory: A Survey of Empirical Evidence , 2000 .

[11]  G. R. Oldham,et al.  Employee Creativity: Personal and Contextual Factors at Work , 1996 .

[12]  S. Parker,et al.  Taking Stock: Integrating and Differentiating Multiple Proactive Behaviors , 2010 .

[13]  M. Lubatkin,et al.  Ambidexterity and Performance in Small-to Medium-Sized Firms: The Pivotal Role of Top Management Team Behavioral Integration , 2006 .

[14]  S. Snell,et al.  Intellectual Capital Architectures and Ambidextrous Learning: A Framework for Human Resource Management , 2009 .

[15]  Snejina Michailova,et al.  Diagnosing and Fighting Knowledge-Sharing Hostility , 2002 .

[16]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change , 1996 .

[17]  Luc G. Pelletier,et al.  Work Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation Scale: Its value for organizational psychology research. , 2009 .

[18]  I. Nonaka,et al.  Enabling Knowledge Creation , 2000 .

[19]  C. Shalley,et al.  Matching Creativity Requirements and the Work Environment: Effects on Satisfaction and Intentions to Leave , 2000 .

[20]  Mark G. Wilson,et al.  Organizational achievement values, high-involvement work practices, and business unit performance , 2011 .

[21]  A. Hayes.  Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach , 2013 .

[22]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[23]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity , 1996 .

[24]  Dean Keith Simonton,et al.  Genius, Creativity, and Leadership: Historiometric Inquiries , 1984 .

[25]  P. Blau.  Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[26]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation and Peformance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[27]  Dusya Vera,et al.  Strategic Leadership and Organizational Learning , 2004 .

[28]  A. Dysvik,et al.  Empowering leadership, employee goal orientations and work performance , 2014 .

[29]  Catherine E. Connelly,et al.  Beyond knowledge sharing: Withholding knowledge at work , 2008 .

[30]  S. Tarba,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity and Performance: A Meta-Analysis , 2013 .

[31]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  The use of collaborative electronic media for information sharing: an exploratory study of determinants , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[32]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Building Ambidexterity Into an Organization , 2004 .

[33]  M. McLure Wasko,et al.  "It is what one does": why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[34]  Harbir Singh,et al.  Organizing for Innovation: Managing the Coordination-Autonomy Dilemma in Technology Acquisitions , 2006 .

[35]  C. Gibson,et al.  THE ANTECEDENTS , CONSEQUENCES , AND MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY , 2004 .

[36]  Tom J. M. Mom,et al.  Investigating Managers' Exploration and Exploitation Activities: The Influence of Top-Down, Bottom-Up, and Horizontal Knowledge Inflows , 2006 .

[37]  Yi Li,et al.  Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Influence of business strategies and environment , 2010 .

[38]  M. Visser,et al.  Empowerment, knowledge conversion and dimensions of organizational learning , 2011 .

[39]  William H. Starbuck,et al.  When Is Play Productive? , 1991 .

[40]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[41]  Cees J. Gelderman,et al.  Explaining the internet usage of SMEs: The impact of market orientation, behavioural norms, motivation and technology acceptance , 2015, Internet Res..

[42]  M. Frese,et al.  4. Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century , 2001 .

[43]  M. Lindell,et al.  Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[44]  Terry S. Overton,et al.  Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys , 1977 .

[45]  B Francis,et al.  Walking a tightrope. , 1990, Nursing.

[46]  D. Dougherty,et al.  Sustained product innovation in large, mature organizations: Overcoming innovation-to-organization problems. , 1996 .

[47]  K. M. Bartol,et al.  Linking Empowering Leadership and Employee Creativity: The Influence of Psychological Empowerment, Intrinsic Motivation, and Creative Process Engagement , 2010 .

[48]  W. Schaufeli.  Engaging leadership in the job demands-resources model , 2015 .

[49]  B. Frey,et al.  The Cost of Price Incentives: An Empirical Analysis of Motivation Crowding-Out , 1997 .

[50]  Shimul Melwani,et al.  The Bias Against Creativity , 2012, Psychological science.

[51]  Marina du Plessis,et al.  The role of knowledge management in innovation , 2007, J. Knowl. Manag..

[52]  Carol T. Kulik,et al.  Old Friends, New Faces: Motivation Research in the 1990s , 1999 .

[53]  Emanuele Lettieri,et al.  Knowledge Sharing and Innovative Work Behaviour in Healthcare: A Micro‐Level Investigation of Direct and Indirect Effects , 2014 .

[54]  E. Deci.  Cognitive Evaluation Theory: Effects of Extrinsic Rewards on Intrinsic Motivation , 1975 .

[55]  C. Lance,et al.  What Reviewers Should Expect from Authors Regarding Common Method Bias in Organizational Research , 2010 .

[56]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Why No One Really Wants Creativity , 1995 .

[57]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[58]  Taesung Kim,et al.  Leadership and Employee Engagement , 2015 .

[59]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Effects of external evaluation on artistic creativity. , 1979 .

[60]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidexterity as a Dynamic Capability: Resolving the Innovator's Dilemma , 2007 .

[61]  Natalia Martín Cruz,et al.  The influence of employee motivation on knowledge transfer , 2009, J. Knowl. Manag..

[62]  B. Bass.  LEADERSHIP AND PERFORMANCE BEYOND EXPECTATIONS , 1985 .

[63]  B. Alimo‐Metcalfe,et al.  The impact of engaging leadership on performance, attitudes to work and wellbeing at work: a longitudinal study. , 2008, Journal of health organization and management.

[64]  Dawn Iacobucci,et al.  Introduction to Mediation , 2019, Mediation Theory and Practice.

[65]  Fátima Guadamillas,et al.  Organizational Factors to Support Knowledge Management and Innovation , 2011, J. Knowl. Manag..

[66]  B. Bass,et al.  Transformational Leadership And Organizational Culture , 1993 .

[67]  Jonathan A. Rhoades,et al.  The empowering leadership questionnaire: the construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors , 2000 .

[68]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Leader Behaviors and the Work Environment for Creativity: Perceived Leader Support , 2004 .

[69]  Paul H. J. Hendriks,et al.  Why share knowledge? The influence of ICT on the motivation for knowledge sharing , 1999 .

[70]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Factors, and Organizational Climate , 2005, MIS Q..

[71]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[72]  Giacomo Negro,et al.  Filling Empty Seats: How Status and Organizational Hierarchies Affect Exploration Versus Exploitation in Team Design , 2006 .

[73]  Giles Hirst,et al.  A social identity perspective on leadership and employee creativity , 2009 .

[74]  E. Deci,et al.  A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[75]  G. O'Connor,et al.  Managing radical innovation: an overview of emergent strategy issues , 2002 .

[76]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators , 2008 .

[77]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  The interplay between exploration and exploitation. , 2006 .

[78]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Task Revision: A Neglected Form of Work Performance , 1990 .

[79]  D. Bem.  Self-Perception Theory , 1972 .

[80]  Qing Cao,et al.  Unpacking Organizational Ambidexterity: Dimensions, Contingencies, and Synergistic Effects , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[81]  M. Mumford,et al.  Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships , 2002 .

[82]  Natalia Martín-Cruz,et al.  The mediating role of affective commitment in the rewards–knowledge transfer relation , 2015 .

[83]  B. Frey,et al.  Motivation, Knowledge Transfer, and Organizational Forms , 2000 .

[84]  Zi-Lin He,et al.  Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[85]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited , 2003 .

[86]  M. Huysman,et al.  Practices of managing knowledge sharing: towards a second wave of knowledge management , 2004 .

[87]  B. Honig,et al.  Radical changes, ideology, dwindling membership and financial distress: A macro longitudinal study , 2011 .

[88]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  Managing Strategic Contradictions: A Top Management Model for Managing Innovation Streams , 2005 .

[89]  Jenny Darroch,et al.  Knowledge management, innovation and firm performance , 2005, J. Knowl. Manag..

[90]  S. Ashford,et al.  Self-Regulation of Creativity at Work: The Role of Feedback-Seeking Behavior in Creative Performance , 2011 .

[91]  Marjolein C. J. Caniëls,et al.  Employee ambidexterity, high performance work systems and innovative work behaviour: How much balance do we need? , 2019 .

[92]  S. Jackson,et al.  Toward Developing Human Resource Management Systems for Knowledge-Intensive Teamwork , 2006 .

[93]  S. Tarba,et al.  A meta-analysis of the effect of organizational ambidexterity on performance , 2013 .

[94]  Yu-Wei Chuang,et al.  Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of KMS quality, KMS self-efficacy, and organizational climate , 2012, Knowl. Based Syst..

[95]  Thomas E. Becker.  Potential Problems in the Statistical Control of Variables in Organizational Research: A Qualitative Analysis With Recommendations , 2005 .

[96]  F. Hesse,et al.  Motivated shortcomings in explanation: the role of comparative self-evaluation and awareness of explanation recipient's knowledge. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[97]  Jack A. Nickerson,et al.  Being Efficiently Fickle: A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Choice , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[98]  Víctor Martín-Pérez,et al.  Does HRM generate ambidextrous employees for ambidextrous learning? The moderating role of management support , 2015 .

[99]  L. Gumusluoglu,et al.  Transformational Leadership, Creativity, and Organizational Innovation , 2009 .

[100]  K. M. Bartol,et al.  Linking Empowering Leadership and Employee Creativity: The Influence of Psychological Empowerment, Intrinsic Motivation, and Creative Process Engagement , 2010 .

[101]  J. Mathieu,et al.  To Empower or Not to Empower Your Sales Force? An Empirical Examination of the Influence of Leadership Empowerment Behavior on Customer Satisfaction and Performance , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[102]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[103]  M. Frese,et al.  Action as the core of work psychology: A German approach. , 1994 .

[104]  Richard Leifer,et al.  Commercializing discontinuous innovations: bridging the gap from discontinuous innovation project to operations , 2002, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[105]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[106]  Gregory Richards,et al.  Benchmarking the learning capability of organizations , 1997 .

[107]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[108]  M. Tushman,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation Within and Across Organizations , 2010 .

[109]  Pankaj C. Patel,et al.  Walking the Tightrope: An Assessment of the Relationship between High-Performance Work Systems and Organizational Ambidexterity , 2013 .