How Does Social Influence Really Affect Consumer Decisions? Insights from an Eye Tracking Study

Social influence shapes consumers’ decision-making process by observing other consumers’ actions. Having shown that social influence affects consumers’ actual purchases (beyond price and discount) using longitudinal secondary data from Groupon, we conducted a lab experiment, including eye tracking, to examine how different information stimuli (i.e., social influence stimulus and discount stimulus) indirectly affect consumers’ purchasing decisions by shaping their visual attention. Using eye tracking, we were able to capture consumers’ eye movements, allowing us to identify which information stimuli (i.e., areas of interest on a webpage) consumers look at, the duration of their attention on each stimulus (i.e., fixation duration), and frequency of viewing (i.e., fixation frequency) on these information stimuli, thus enabling us to identify the exact visual information that influence their purchase decisions. By objectively measuring visual attention (measured with fixation duration and fixation frequency), we can obtain a much richer understanding of how exactly consumers cognitively process information and subsequently make decisions. We found that consumers have longer visual attention duration and check existing sales more frequently despite a smaller discount level. Interestingly, instead of a direct effect, information stimuli indirectly affect consumer purchasing decisions via their effects on visual attention. Specifically, visual attention (fixation duration and fixation frequency) on the social influence stimulus plays a mediating role (through memory recall), whereas visual attention (fixation frequency) on the discount stimulus plays a moderating role in the positive relationship between the information stimulus and purchasing decisions. The findings imply that visual attention to information stimuli has diverse (both mediating and moderating) roles in shaping consumers’ purchasing decisions. We discuss theoretical, methodological, and managerial contributions and implications of our research.

[1]  Xitong Li,et al.  Measuring Effects of Observational Learning and Social-Network Word-of-Mouth (WOM) on the Sales of Daily-Deal Vouchers , 2013, 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[2]  Michael Burch,et al.  Visual Analytics Methodology for Eye Movement Studies , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[3]  Jae-Hyeon Ahn,et al.  Attention to Banner Ads and Their Effectiveness: An Eye-Tracking Approach , 2012, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[4]  Tung X. Bui,et al.  Value proposition and social proof in online deals: an exploratory study of Groupon.com , 2012, ICEC '12.

[5]  Yi Liu,et al.  Buyers’ purchasing time and herd behavior on deal-of-the-day group-buying websites , 2012, Electron. Mark..

[6]  Georgios Zervas,et al.  Daily deals: prediction, social diffusion, and reputational ramifications , 2011, WSDM '12.

[7]  Thomas Sandholm,et al.  Collective attention and the dynamics of group deals , 2011, WWW.

[8]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  ON THE USE OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL TOOLS IN IS RESEARCH : DEVELOPING A RESEARCH AGENDA FOR NEUROIS 1 , 2012 .

[9]  Juanjuan Zhang,et al.  The Sound of Silence: Observational Learning in the U.S. Kidney Market , 2010, Mark. Sci..

[10]  John G. Lynch,et al.  Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis , 2010 .

[11]  Feng-Yang Kuo,et al.  An exploratory study of cognitive effort involved in decision under Framing - an application of the eye-tracking technology , 2009, Decis. Support Syst..

[12]  Milena M. Head,et al.  Exploring human images in website design: a multi-method approach , 2009 .

[13]  Kai H. Lim,et al.  Web strategies to promote internet shopping: is cultural-customization needed? , 2009 .

[14]  Bin Gu,et al.  Informational Cascades and Software Adoption on the Internet: An Empirical Investigation , 2008, MIS Q..

[15]  Vladas Griskevicius,et al.  Applying (and Resisting) Peer Influence , 2008 .

[16]  Michel Wedel,et al.  Eye tracking for visual marketing , 2008 .

[17]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[18]  R. Pieters,et al.  A Review of Eye-Tracking Research in Marketing , 2008 .

[19]  Shuk Ying Ho,et al.  Understanding the Impact of Web Personalization on User Information Processing and Decision Outcomes , 2006, MIS Q..

[20]  Jen-Hung Huang,et al.  Herding in online product choice , 2006 .

[21]  Terry C. Lansdown,et al.  The mind's eye: cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research , 2005 .

[22]  D. E. Irwin Fixation location and fixation duration as indices of cognitive processing , 2004 .

[23]  Eric Bonabeau,et al.  The perils of the imitation age. , 2004, Harvard business review.

[24]  Shachar Kariv,et al.  Distinguishing Informational Cascades from Herd Behavior in the Laboratory , 2004 .

[25]  Rik Pieters,et al.  Attention Capture and Transfer in Advertising: Brand, Pictorial, and Text-Size Effects , 2004 .

[26]  S. Shimojo,et al.  Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  Eyal M Reingold,et al.  Long-term perceptual specificity effects in recognition memory: the transformed pictures paradigm. , 2003, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[28]  Andrew T. Duchowski,et al.  Eye Tracking Methodology: Theory and Practice , 2003, Springer London.

[29]  Andrew T Duchowski,et al.  A breadth-first survey of eye-tracking applications , 2002, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[30]  Charles J. Kacmar,et al.  Developing and Validating Trust Measures for e-Commerce: An Integrative Typology , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[31]  Michael E. Holmes,et al.  Visual attention to repeated internet images: testing the scanpath theory on the world wide web , 2002, ETRA.

[32]  Eileen A. Hogan The Attention Economy: Understanding the New Currency of Business , 2001 .

[33]  Oswald Huber,et al.  Accounting and convincing: The effect of two types of justification on the decision process. , 2001 .

[34]  Joseph H. Goldberg,et al.  Identifying fixations and saccades in eye-tracking protocols , 2000, ETRA.

[35]  Michel Wedel,et al.  Eye Fixations on Advertisements and Memory for Brands: A Model and Findings , 2000 .

[36]  Joan Meyers-Levy,et al.  Consumers' processing of persuasive advertisements: An integrative framework of persuasion theories , 1999 .

[37]  K. Rayner Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[38]  Dhruv Grewal,et al.  The Effect of Store Name, Brand Name and Price Discounts on Consumers' Evaluations and Purchase Intentions , 1998 .

[39]  Charles A. Holt,et al.  Information Cascades in the Laboratory , 1998 .

[40]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  TO SEE OR NOT TO SEE: The Need for Attention to Perceive Changes in Scenes , 1997 .

[41]  Ward Hanson,et al.  Hits and misses: Herd behavior and online product popularity , 1996 .

[42]  Lee G. Cooper,et al.  The Discounting of Discounts and Promotion Thresholds , 1992 .

[43]  R. Bornstein,et al.  Stimulus recognition and the mere exposure effect. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[44]  K. Rayner,et al.  Eye movements and scene perception. , 1992, Canadian journal of psychology.

[45]  A. Banerjee,et al.  A Simple Model of Herd Behavior , 1992 .

[46]  S. Bikhchandani,et al.  You have printed the following article : A Theory of Fads , Fashion , Custom , and Cultural Change as Informational Cascades , 2007 .

[47]  Alan Kingstone,et al.  Orienting of Visual Attention , 1992 .

[48]  K. Rayner Eye movements and visual cognition : scene perception and reading , 1992 .

[49]  William B. Dodds,et al.  Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers’ Product Evaluations , 1991 .

[50]  Scot Burton,et al.  Distinguishing Coupon Proneness from Value Consciousness: An Acquisition-Transaction Utility Theory Perspective , 1990 .

[51]  T. K. Srull,et al.  Memory and Cognition in Its Social Context , 1989 .

[52]  Richard G. Netemeyer,et al.  Measurement of Consumer Susceptibility to Interpersonal Influence , 1989 .

[53]  V. Zeithaml Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence: , 1988 .

[54]  C. M. Henderson,et al.  The Interaction of Coupons With Price and Store Promotions , 1988 .

[55]  Charles E. Miller,et al.  Group decision making and normative versus informational influence: Effects of type of issue and assigned decision rule. , 1987 .

[56]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement , 1983 .

[57]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[58]  N. Mackworth,et al.  Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[59]  M. Just,et al.  Eye fixations and cognitive processes , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[60]  J. Antes The time course of picture viewing. , 1974, Journal of experimental psychology.

[61]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[62]  E. Hess,et al.  Pupil Size as Related to Interest Value of Visual Stimuli , 1960, Science.

[63]  M. Deutsch,et al.  A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgement. , 1955, Journal of abnormal psychology.