Analysis of Slug Tests in Formations of High Hydraulic Conductivity

A new procedure is presented for the analysis of slug tests performed in partially penetrating wells in formations of high hydraulic conductivity. This approach is a simple, spreadsheet-based implementation of existing models that can be used for analysis of tests from confined or unconfined aquifers. Field examples of tests exhibiting oscillatory and nonoscillatory behavior are used to illustrate the procedure and to compare results with estimates obtained using alternative approaches. The procedure is considerably simpler than recently proposed methods for this hydrogeologic setting. Although the simplifications required by the approach can introduce error into hydraulic-conductivity estimates, this additional error becomes negligible when appropriate measures are taken in the field. These measures are summarized in a set of practical field guidelines for slug tests in highly permeable aquifers.

[1]  C. D. McElwee,et al.  A NONLINEAR MODEL FOR ANALYSIS OF SLUG-TEST DATA , 1998 .

[2]  Kenneth L. Kipp,et al.  Type Curve Analysis of Inertial Effects in the Response of a Well to a Slug Test , 1985 .

[3]  Garth van der Kamp,et al.  Determining aquifer transmissivity by means of well response tests: The underdamped case , 1976 .

[4]  James J. Butler,et al.  Improving the quality of parameter estimates obtained from slug tests , 1996 .

[5]  James J Butler,et al.  A Simple Correction for Slug Tests in Small‐Diameter Wells , 2002, Ground water.

[6]  Swen Magnuson,et al.  Spreadsheet Modeling of Slug Tests Using the van der Kamp Method , 1995 .

[7]  M. J. Hvorslev.  Time lag and soil permeability in ground-water observations , 1951 .

[8]  H. Bouwer,et al.  A slug test for determining hydraulic conductivity of unconfined aquifers with completely or partially penetrating wells , 1976 .

[9]  John M Healey,et al.  Hydraulic Tests with Direct‐Push Equipment , 2002, Ground water.

[10]  Brian R. Zurbuchen,et al.  Dynamic interpretation of slug tests in highly permeable aquifers , 2002 .

[11]  Willis D. Weight,et al.  Oscillatory Slug‐Test Data Sets: A Comparison of Two Methods , 1999 .

[12]  C D McElwee,et al.  Application of a Nonlinear Slug Test Model , 2001, Ground water.

[13]  Vitaly A. Zlotnik,et al.  Interpretation of Slug and Packer Tests in Anisotropic Aquifers , 1994 .

[14]  Brian R. Zurbuchen,et al.  Dipole Probe: Design and Field Applications of a Single‐Borehole Device for Measurements of Vertical Variations of Hydraulic Conductivity , 1998 .

[15]  J. D. Bredehoeft,et al.  Response of a finite-diameter well to an instantaneous charge of water. Paper No. H-21 , 1966 .