Evaluating erroneous offside calls in soccer

The ability to simultaneously attend to multiple objects declines with increases in the visual angle separating distant objects. We explored whether these laboratory-measured limits on visual attentional spread generalize to a real life context: offside calls by soccer assistant referees. We coded all offside calls from a full year of first division German soccer matches. By determining the x-y coordinates of the relevant players and assistant referee on the soccer field we were able to calculate how far assistant referees had to spread their visual attention to perform well. Counterintuitively, assistant referees made fewer errors when they were farther away from the action due to an advantageous (smaller) visual angle on the game action. The pattern held even when we accounted for individual differences in a laboratory-based attentional spread measure of ten of the assistant referees. Our finding that errors are linked to smaller visual angles may explain the complaints of fans in some situations: Those seated directly behind the assistant referee, further from the players, might actually have it easier to make the right call because the relevant players would form a smaller visual angle.

[1]  Michael Spittle,et al.  Exploration of the perceptual-cognitive processes that contribute to in-game decision-making of Australian football umpires , 2016 .

[2]  Peter J. Beek,et al.  Errors in judging ‘offside’ in football , 2000, Nature.

[3]  Werner Helsen,et al.  Physical and perceptual-cognitive demands of top-class refereeing in association football , 2004, Journal of sports sciences.

[4]  Raôul R. D. Oudejans,et al.  The Effects of Additional Lines on a Football Field on Assistant Referees' Positioning and Offside Judgments , 2012 .

[5]  B. Timmons,et al.  Exercise and the cytokine balance: A paediatric perspective , 2006, Journal of sports sciences.

[6]  Raôul R. D. Oudejans Judging offside in football: Can attention of assistant referees be educated? , 2005 .

[7]  Edgard Morya,et al.  Flag Errors in Soccer Games: The Flash-Lag Effect Brought to Real Life , 2002, Perception.

[8]  Daniel Memmert,et al.  The size and shape of the attentional "spotlight" varies with differences in sports expertise. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[9]  Peter J. Beek,et al.  How position and motion of expert assistant referees in soccer relate to the quality of their offside judgements during actual match play , 2005 .

[10]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Offside decision making of assistant referees in the English Premier League: Impact of physical and perceptual-cognitive factors on match performance , 2010, Journal of sports sciences.

[11]  Daniel Memmert,et al.  The Attention Window: A Narrative Review of Limitations and Opportunities Influencing the Focus of Attention , 2017, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[12]  David O'Hare,et al.  The psychological and performance demands of association football refereeing. , 2006 .

[13]  Francisco Belda Maruenda,et al.  Can the human eye detect an offside position during a football match? , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[14]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Training of perceptual-cognitive skills in offside decision making. , 2010, Journal of sport & exercise psychology.

[16]  Werner Helsen,et al.  Errors in judging “offside” in association football: Test of the optical error versus the perceptual flash-lag hypothesis , 2006, Journal of sports sciences.

[17]  Daniel Memmert,et al.  Fixation Strategy Influences the Ability to Focus Attention on Two Spatially Separate Objects , 2013, PloS one.