The method of finite spheres in three-dimensional linear static analysis

The method of finite spheres is developed for the analysis of 3D static linear elasticity problems.A piecewise Gauss-Legendre quadrature rule for 3D integration domains is proposed.The method is implemented in the user routine of the commercial finite element program ADINA.The reliability and efficiency of the method are compared to the standard FEM. The objective of this paper is to assess the reliability and effectiveness of the method of finite spheres, a truly meshless overlapping finite element method, for the solution of practical three-dimensional linear elasticity problems. Advantages include simplified discretization and the elimination of element distortion. The method is implemented in the ADINA finite element program through a user-supplied element subroutine. The solutions of three increasingly complex three-dimensional problems are studied (1) to establish the reliability of the method for practical linear elasticity problems and (2) to assess the effectiveness of the method as compared to the standard finite element method. The solutions indicate that the method of finite spheres is between one and two orders of magnitude more expensive in computational time than the standard finite element method. This is still a promising result since there are significant time savings for the method of finite spheres during the pre-processing phase, particularly in the discretization of complicated three-dimensional geometries and because the overlapping sphere elements can be directly coupled to traditional finite elements.

[1]  S. Atluri,et al.  Meshless Local Petrov-Galerkin (MLPG) approaches for solving 3D Problems in elasto-statics , 2004 .

[2]  I. Babuska,et al.  The Partition of Unity Method , 1997 .

[3]  K. Bathe,et al.  The method of finite spheres with improved numerical integration , 2001 .

[4]  K. Bathe.  Finite Element Procedures , 1995 .

[5]  T. Belytschko,et al.  Element‐free Galerkin methods , 1994 .

[6]  Ivo Babuška,et al.  Quadrature for meshless methods , 2008 .

[7]  J. Oden,et al.  H‐p clouds—an h‐p meshless method , 1996 .

[8]  T. Belytschko,et al.  A three-dimensional explicit element-free galerkin method , 1997 .

[9]  Azim Eskandarian,et al.  Meshless Methods in Solid Mechanics , 2006 .

[10]  Sunil Saigal,et al.  A three-dimensional element-free Galerkin elastic and elastoplastic formulation , 1999 .

[11]  T. Belytschko,et al.  Nodal integration of the element-free Galerkin method , 1996 .

[12]  K. Bathe,et al.  The method of finite spheres for wave propagation problems , 2014 .

[13]  T. Belytschko,et al.  A new implementation of the element free Galerkin method , 1994 .

[14]  K. Bathe,et al.  The method of finite spheres , 2000 .

[15]  I. Babuska,et al.  The partition of unity finite element method: Basic theory and applications , 1996 .

[16]  Giulio Ventura,et al.  The partition of unity quadrature in meshless methods , 2002 .

[17]  K. Bathe,et al.  Coupling and enrichment schemes for finite element and finite sphere discretizations , 2005 .

[18]  M. Shephard,et al.  Hierarchical tree-based discretization for the method of finite spheres , 2003 .

[19]  Ivo Babuška,et al.  Effect of numerical integration on meshless methods , 2009 .

[20]  Giuseppe Gambolati,et al.  A comparison of numerical integration rules for the meshless local Petrov–Galerkin method , 2007, Numerical Algorithms.

[21]  K. Bathe,et al.  Displacement/pressure mixed interpolation in the method of finite spheres , 2001 .

[22]  K. Bathe,et al.  Effects of element distortions on the performance of isoparametric elements , 1993 .

[23]  Guirong Liu.  Meshfree Methods: Moving Beyond the Finite Element Method, Second Edition , 2009 .

[24]  K. Bathe,et al.  Towards an efficient meshless computational technique: the method of finite spheres , 2001 .

[25]  Hyun Gyu Kim,et al.  A critical assessment of the truly Meshless Local Petrov-Galerkin (MLPG), and Local Boundary Integral Equation (LBIE) methods , 1999 .

[26]  S. De,et al.  Enrichment of the method of finite spheres using geometry‐independent localized scalable bubbles , 2007 .

[27]  Guirong Liu,et al.  Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH): an Overview and Recent Developments , 2010 .

[28]  Lingbo Zhang,et al.  The finite element method with overlapping elements A new paradigm for CAD driven simulations , 2017 .

[29]  B. Nayroles,et al.  Generalizing the finite element method: Diffuse approximation and diffuse elements , 1992 .

[30]  K. Bathe,et al.  The Mechanics of Solids and Structures - Hierarchical Modeling and the Finite Element Solution , 2011 .

[31]  Guirong Liu.  Mesh Free Methods: Moving Beyond the Finite Element Method , 2002 .

[32]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  Numerical integration of the Galerkin weak form in meshfree methods , 1999 .

[33]  Mark A Fleming,et al.  Meshless methods: An overview and recent developments , 1996 .

[34]  S. De,et al.  Development of a genetic algorithm‐based lookup table approach for efficient numerical integration in the method of finite spheres with application to the solution of thin beam and plate problems , 2006 .

[35]  S. Atluri,et al.  A new Meshless Local Petrov-Galerkin (MLPG) approach in computational mechanics , 1998 .

[36]  Joseph J Monaghan,et al.  An introduction to SPH , 1987 .

[37]  S. De,et al.  Towards an automatic discretization scheme for the method of finite spheres and its coupling with the finite element method , 2005 .