Multimodal diagnostics in multiple sclerosis: predicting disability and conversion from relapsing-remitting to secondary progressive disease course – protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

Background The number of patients diagnosed with multiple sclerosis (MS) has increased significantly over the last decade. The challenge is to identify the transition from relapsing-remitting to secondary progressive MS. Since available methods to examine patients with MS are limited, both the diagnostics and prognostication of disease progression would benefit from the multimodal approach. The latter combines the evidence obtained from disparate radiologic modalities, neurophysiological evaluation, cognitive assessment and molecular diagnostics. In this systematic review we will analyse the advantages of multimodal studies in predicting the risk of conversion to secondary progressive MS. Methods and analysis We will use peer-reviewed publications available in Web of Science, Medline/PubMed, Scopus, Embase and CINAHL databases. In vivo studies reporting the predictive value of diagnostic methods will be considered. Selected publications will be processed through Covidence software for automatic deduplication and blind screening. Two reviewers will use a predefined template to extract the data from eligible studies. We will analyse the performance metrics (1) for the classification models reflecting the risk of secondary progression: sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, positive and negative predictive values; (2) for the regression models forecasting disability scores: the ratio of mean absolute error to the range of values. Then, we will create ranking charts representing performance of the algorithms for calculating disability level and MS progression. Finally, we will compare the predictive power of radiological and radiomical correlates of clinical disability and cognitive impairment in patients with MS. Ethics and dissemination The study does not require ethical approval because we will analyse publicly available literature. The project results will be published in a peer-review journal and presented at scientific conferences. PROSPERO registration number CRD42022354179.

[1]  M. Schoonheim,et al.  Serum neurofilament light chain predicts cognitive worsening in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis better than brain MRI measures , 2022, Multiple sclerosis.

[2]  A. Heslegrave,et al.  Serum neurofilament light and MRI predictors of cognitive decline in patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: Analysis from the MS-STAT randomised controlled trial , 2022, Multiple sclerosis.

[3]  L. Airas,et al.  Innate Immune Cell–Related Pathology in the Thalamus Signals a Risk for Disability Progression in Multiple Sclerosis , 2022, Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation.

[4]  A. Berardelli,et al.  Are Neurophysiological Biomarkers Able to Discriminate Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Subtypes? , 2022, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[5]  K. Hoshi,et al.  Assisting the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis using a set of regional brain volumes: A classification model for patients and healthy controls , 2021, Informatics in Medicine Unlocked.

[6]  T. Berger,et al.  Clinical and Paraclinical Biomarkers and the Hitches to Assess Conversion to Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review , 2021, Frontiers in Neurology.

[7]  P. Cuijpers,et al.  Doing Meta-Analysis with R , 2021 .

[8]  M. Filippi,et al.  Spinal Fluid Myeloid Microvesicles Predict Disease Course in Multiple Sclerosis , 2021, Annals of neurology.

[9]  N. Toschi,et al.  Cortical and phase rim lesions on 7 T MRI as markers of multiple sclerosis disease progression , 2021, Brain communications.

[10]  Mehmet Feyzi Aksahin,et al.  Detection of multiple sclerosis from photic stimulation EEG signals , 2021, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[11]  Elena Garcia-Martin,et al.  Machine learning in diagnosis and disability prediction of multiple sclerosis using optical coherence tomography , 2021, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[12]  R. Deichmann,et al.  Multiparametric Quantitative MRI in Neurological Diseases , 2021, Frontiers in Neurology.

[13]  M. Forsting,et al.  Machine learning-based differentiation between multiple sclerosis and glioma WHO II°-IV° using O-(2-[18F] fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine positron emission tomography , 2021, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[14]  E. Leray,et al.  Rising prevalence of multiple sclerosis worldwide: Insights from the Atlas of MS, third edition , 2020, Multiple sclerosis.

[15]  L. Airas,et al.  Brain TSPO-PET predicts later disease progression independent of relapses in multiple sclerosis , 2020, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[16]  Leila Akramian Arani,et al.  Development of a Knowledge-based Clinical Decision Support System for Multiple Sclerosis Diagnosis , 2020, Journal of medicine and life.

[17]  M. Freedman,et al.  Proportion of alemtuzumab-treated patients converting from relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis over 6 years , 2020, Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical.

[18]  Mário João Fartaria,et al.  RimNet: A deep 3D multimodal MRI architecture for paramagnetic rim lesion assessment in multiple sclerosis , 2020, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[19]  Bryan R. Smith,et al.  Paramagnetic Rim Lesions are Specific to Multiple Sclerosis: An International Multicenter 3T MRI Study , 2020, Annals of neurology.

[20]  D. Arnold,et al.  Serum neurofilament light as a biomarker in progressive multiple sclerosis , 2020, Neurology.

[21]  M. Filippi,et al.  Identifying Progression In Multiple Sclerosis: New Perspectives. , 2020, Annals of neurology.

[22]  M. Dwyer,et al.  MRI biomarkers of disease progression and conversion to secondary-progressive multiple sclerosis. , 2020, Expert review of neurotherapeutics.

[23]  Andrea Zaccaria,et al.  Considering patient clinical history impacts performance of machine learning models in predicting course of multiple sclerosis , 2020, PloS one.

[24]  Giuseppe M Sechi,et al.  Prevalence of multiple sclerosis in Sardinia: A systematic cross-sectional multi-source survey , 2020, Multiple sclerosis.

[25]  T. Vollmer,et al.  Oligoclonal IgG antibodies in multiple sclerosis target patient-specific peptides , 2020, PloS one.

[26]  L. Airas,et al.  Serum glial fibrillary acidic protein correlates with multiple sclerosis disease severity , 2020, Multiple sclerosis.

[27]  A. Haghdoost,et al.  Incidence of multiple sclerosis in Iran: a nationwide, population-based study. , 2019, Public health.

[28]  D. Ramasamy,et al.  Atrophied Brain T2 Lesion Volume at MRI Is Associated with Disability Progression and Conversion to Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis. , 2019, Radiology.

[29]  G. Chiang Atrophied T2 Lesion Volume in Multiple Sclerosis: Reducing the Focus on Lesion Counting. , 2019, Radiology.

[30]  R. Meuli,et al.  The “central vein sign” in patients with diagnostic “red flags” for multiple sclerosis: A prospective multicenter 3T study , 2019, Multiple sclerosis.

[31]  T. Ziemssen,et al.  A focus on secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS): challenges in diagnosis and definition , 2019, Journal of Neurology.

[32]  Klara Novotna,et al.  Slowed articulation rate is associated with information processing speed decline in multiple sclerosis: A pilot study , 2019, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[33]  Elena Garcia-Martin,et al.  Swept source optical coherence tomography to early detect multiple sclerosis disease. The use of machine learning techniques , 2019, PloS one.

[34]  M. Inglese,et al.  Molecular imaging of multiple sclerosis: from the clinical demand to novel radiotracers , 2019, EJNMMI Radiopharmacy and Chemistry.

[35]  R. Barea,et al.  A computer-aided diagnosis of multiple sclerosis based on mfVEP recordings , 2019, PloS one.

[36]  J. Sipilä,et al.  Multiple sclerosis epidemiology in Finland: Regional differences and high incidence , 2019, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[37]  M. Morgan,et al.  Multiple challenges for people after transitioning to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: a qualitative study , 2019, BMJ Open.

[38]  C. Morgan,et al.  Meta-analysis for diagnostic tests , 2018, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[39]  J. Vistbakka Circulating microRNAs as biomarkers in multiple sclerosis , 2018 .

[40]  Josué Luiz Dalboni da Rocha,et al.  Characterization of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients using support vector machine classifications of functional and diffusion MRI data , 2018, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[41]  M. Hutchinson,et al.  2017 McDonald diagnostic criteria: A review of the evidence. , 2018, Multiple sclerosis and related disorders.

[42]  M. Calabrese,et al.  The cortical damage, early relapses, and onset of the progressive phase in multiple sclerosis , 2018, Neurology.

[43]  Michael Deppe,et al.  Non-lesional cerebellar damage in patients with clinically isolated syndrome: DTI measures predict early conversion into clinically definite multiple sclerosis☆ , 2018, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[44]  I. Cerovečki,et al.  Prevalence of multiple sclerosis in Croatia: data from national and non-governmental organization registries , 2018, Croatian medical journal.

[45]  R. Marrie,et al.  Establishing the Incidence and Prevalence of Multiple Sclerosis in Saskatchewan , 2018, Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques.

[46]  G. Nasios,et al.  Cognitive and Language Deficits in Multiple Sclerosis: Comparison of Relapsing Remitting and Secondary Progressive Subtypes , 2018, The open neurology journal.

[47]  P. Matthews,et al.  Neuroinflammation and its relationship to changes in brain volume and white matter lesions in multiple sclerosis , 2017, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[48]  M. Barnett,et al.  Exosomal microRNA signatures in multiple sclerosis reflect disease status , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[49]  Roger C. Tam,et al.  Deep learning of joint myelin and T1w MRI features in normal-appearing brain tissue to distinguish between multiple sclerosis patients and healthy controls , 2017, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[50]  D. Chard,et al.  Resolving the clinico-radiological paradox in multiple sclerosis , 2017, F1000Research.

[51]  K. Selmaj,et al.  Global exosome transcriptome profiling reveals biomarkers for multiple sclerosis , 2017, Annals of neurology.

[52]  M. Calabrese,et al.  Cognitive impairment predicts disability progression and cortical thinning in MS: An 8-year study , 2017, Multiple sclerosis.

[53]  D. Reich,et al.  FLAIR* to visualize veins in white matter lesions: A new tool for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis? , 2017, European Radiology.

[54]  J. Rinne,et al.  Imaging of microglial activation in MS using PET: Research use and potential future clinical application , 2017, Multiple sclerosis.

[55]  David H. Miller,et al.  Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges , 2017, The Lancet.

[56]  F. X. Aymerich,et al.  Comparison between gadolinium-enhanced 2D T1-weighted gradient-echo and spin-echo sequences in the detection of active multiple sclerosis lesions on 3.0T MRI , 2017, European Radiology.

[57]  T. Lehtimäki,et al.  Circulating microRNAs as biomarkers in progressive multiple sclerosis , 2017, Multiple sclerosis.

[58]  A. Edwards,et al.  The Transition to Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: An Exploratory Qualitative Study of Health Professionals' Experiences. , 2016, International journal of MS care.

[59]  Gerta Rücker,et al.  Modelling multiple thresholds in meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies , 2016, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[60]  M. Ban,et al.  Age Related Multiple Sclerosis Severity Score: Disability ranked by age , 2017, Multiple sclerosis.

[61]  D. Reich,et al.  Clinical 3-tesla FLAIR* MRI improves diagnostic accuracy in multiple sclerosis , 2016, Multiple sclerosis.

[62]  F. Barkhof,et al.  Evidence-based guidelines: MAGNIMS consensus guidelines on the use of MRI in multiple sclerosis—establishing disease prognosis and monitoring patients , 2015, Nature Reviews Neurology.

[63]  R. Parkkola,et al.  In Vivo Detection of Diffuse Inflammation in Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis Using PET Imaging and the Radioligand 11C-PK11195 , 2014, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[64]  Jimmy Singla,et al.  Medical Expert Systems for Diagnosis of Various Diseases , 2014 .

[65]  L. Kappos,et al.  Improved Characterization of Visual Evoked Potentials in Multiple Sclerosis by Topographic Analysis , 2013, Brain Topography.

[66]  N. Karimi,et al.  Vestibular evoked myogenic potential for diagnoses of multiple sclerosis: is it beneficial? , 2013, Medicinski glasnik : official publication of the Medical Association of Zenica-Doboj Canton, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

[67]  M. Horsfield,et al.  Microstructural magnetic resonance imaging of cortical lesions in multiple sclerosis , 2013, Multiple sclerosis.

[68]  M. Calabrese,et al.  Grey matter lesions in MS , 2013, Prion.

[69]  P. Matthews,et al.  Increased PK11195 PET binding in the cortex of patients with MS correlates with disability , 2012, Neurology.

[70]  Gang Huang,et al.  Comparison of virtual cystoscopy and ultrasonography for bladder cancer detection: a meta-analysis. , 2011, European journal of radiology.

[71]  Zhengliang Xu,et al.  Real-time elastography for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions: a meta-analysis , 2011, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[72]  Massimo Filippi,et al.  MR imaging of multiple sclerosis. , 2011, Radiology.

[73]  P. Arnett,et al.  Cognitive and neurobehavioral features in multiple sclerosis , 2011, Expert review of neurotherapeutics.

[74]  A. Feinstein,et al.  Validity of a computerized version of the Symbol Digit Modalities Test in multiple sclerosis , 2011, Journal of Neurology.

[75]  Bin Zhang,et al.  Comparison of multifocal visual evoked potential, standard automated perimetry and optical coherence tomography in assessing visual pathway in multiple sclerosis patients , 2010, Multiple sclerosis.

[76]  G. Onder,et al.  Correlation between disability and transcranial magnetic stimulation abnormalities in patients with multiple sclerosis , 2009, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[77]  J. C. Houwelingen,et al.  Bivariate Random Effects Meta-Analysis of ROC Curves , 2008, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[78]  G. Johnson,et al.  Diffusion tensor imaging in multiple sclerosis: assessment of regional differences in the axial plane within normal-appearing cervical spinal cord. , 2006, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[79]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[80]  E. İdiman,et al.  Cortical silent period and motor evoked potentials in patients with multiple sclerosis , 2003, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.

[81]  F. Barkhof The clinico‐radiological paradox in multiple sclerosis revisited , 2002, Current opinion in neurology.

[82]  L. Leocani,et al.  Neurophysiological investigations in multiple sclerosis. , 2000, Current opinion in neurology.

[83]  S. Shapiro,et al.  An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples) , 1965 .

[84]  Megan Sorenson,et al.  Library , 1958 .

[85]  C. Lortie Doing Meta-Analysis with R - A Hands-On Guide , 2022, J. Stat. Softw..

[86]  M. Maghbooli,et al.  Diagnostic value of DWI-MRI for the detection of acute plaques in the relapse phase of multiple sclerosis , 2021 .

[87]  U. Sakoglu,et al.  Multiple sclerosis lesion detection in multimodal MRI using simple clustering-based segmentation and classification , 2020 .

[88]  T. Filleron Comparing sensitivity and specificity of medical imaging tests when verification bias is present: The concept of relative diagnostic accuracy. , 2018, European journal of radiology.

[89]  Heinz Holling,et al.  Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy with mada , 2017 .

[90]  Gabriele C DeLuca,et al.  Cognitive Impairment in Multiple Sclerosis: Clinical, Radiologic and Pathologic Insights , 2015, Brain pathology.

[91]  Gerta Rücker,et al.  Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies , 2015 .

[92]  M. Napierala What Is the Bonferroni Correction ? , 2014 .

[93]  Package 'metafor' , 2013 .

[94]  Sarah Callaghan,et al.  The METAFOR Project , 2013 .

[95]  P Glasziou,et al.  Meta-analytic methods for diagnostic test accuracy. , 1995, Journal of clinical epidemiology.