BIRD SONG: THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN URBAN NOISE AND SEXUAL SELECTION

ambient noise is present almost everywhere in the biosphere. Because background noise can potentially mask the acoustic signals that many animals use to communicate, many species may face a problem when trying to get their messages through noisy environments. Here I reviewed some of the strategies that birds use to deal with ambient noise, and related this information to the possible consequences that may result when birds use their songs in the context of sexual selection, a process that has been widely acknowledged as a main force shaping the evolution of bird songs. I suggest that, depending on the species-specific nature of the sexual selection process in relation to the sender songs, ambient noise may impair the probability of reproduction to different degrees in different species. For instance, species whose songs are effective at communicating in noisy environments, but at the same time render the sender a lowered probability of attracting a mate and defending a territory, may face a greater reduction in reproductive success than if the sender’s songs fail in one aspect of sexual selection (e.g. female attraction), but not in the other (e.g. male-male competition). However, more studies are needed if we are to obtain a clearer picture of the possible outcome that may result from the interaction between ambient noise and sexual selection. some questions that need answers are: to what extent ambient noise impairs the processes of sexual selection in nature? are sub-oscines equally vulnerable than oscines?

[1]  R. Patel,et al.  The influence of linguistic content on the Lombard effect. , 2008, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[2]  Singing interactions in coal tits, Parus ater: an experimental approach , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[3]  Peter M. Narins,et al.  Ultrasonic communication in frogs , 2006, Nature.

[4]  P. Yeh,et al.  SOUND TRANSMISSION AND SONG DIVERGENCE: A COMPARISON OF URBAN AND FOREST ACOUSTICS , 2007 .

[5]  M. Brainard,et al.  Performance variability enables adaptive plasticity of ‘crystallized’ adult birdsong , 2007, Nature.

[6]  H Ising,et al.  Community noise exposure and stress in children. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Dietmar Todt,et al.  Noise-dependent song amplitude regulation in a territorial songbird , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[8]  H. Slabbekoorn,et al.  Fluid dynamics: Vortex rings in a constant electric field , 2003, Nature.

[9]  A. Feng,et al.  Ultrasonic communication in concave-eared torrent frogs (Amolops tormotus) , 2008, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[10]  K. Riebel,et al.  Are good ornaments bad armaments? Male chaffinch perception of songs with varying flourish length , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  A. MØller,et al.  Song correlates with social context, testosterone and body condition in male barn swallows , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[12]  J Head,et al.  Aircraft and road traffic noise and children's cognition and health: a cross-national study , 2005, The Lancet.

[13]  Robert Planqué,et al.  Spectral Overlap in Songs and Temporal Avoidance in a Peruvian Bird Assemblage , 2008 .

[14]  P. Slater,et al.  Bird Song: Biological Themes and Variations , 1995 .

[15]  J. Swaddle,et al.  High levels of environmental noise erode pair preferences in zebra finches: implications for noise pollution , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  G. Hill,et al.  Female choice for song characteristics in the house finch , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[17]  F. Wasserman,et al.  Song output and stimulation of the female in white-throated sparrows , 1991, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[18]  William A. Searcy,et al.  Song repertoire size and female preferences in song sparrows , 1984, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[19]  J. Hailman,et al.  Temporal Pattern Shifts to Avoid Acoustic Interference in Singing Birds , 1974, Science.

[20]  A. Lang,et al.  Can the Lombard effect be used to improve low voice intensity in Parkinson's disease? , 1992, European journal of disorders of communication : the journal of the College of Speech and Language Therapists, London.

[21]  H. Slabbekoorn,et al.  Cities Change the Songs of Birds , 2006, Current Biology.

[22]  A. Feng,et al.  Old world frog and bird vocalizations contain prominent ultrasonic harmonics. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  P. Slater,et al.  Ambient noise, motor fatigue, and serial redundancy in chaffinch song , 2006, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[24]  A. A. Ríos-Chelén,et al.  Responses of a sub-oscine bird during playback: Effects of different song variants and breeding period , 2007, Behavioural Processes.

[25]  Michael J. Ryan,et al.  How cricket frog females deal with a noisy world: habitat-related differences in auditory tuning , 2005 .

[26]  J. Cynx,et al.  Amplitude regulation of vocalizations in noise by a songbird,Taeniopygia guttata , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[27]  H. Pick,et al.  Inhibiting the Lombard effect. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  H. Brumm,et al.  Signalling through acoustic windows: nightingales avoid interspecific competition by short-term adjustment of song timing , 2006, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[29]  D. Mennill,et al.  Male House Finches with Elaborate Songs have Higher Reproductive Performance , 2006 .

[30]  R. Planqué,et al.  Spectral overlap in songs and temporal overlap in a Peruvian bird assemblage , 2008 .

[31]  D. Kroodsma Chapter 4 – The diversity and plasticity of birdsong , 2004 .

[32]  G. R. J. Hockey Effect of Loud Noise on Attentional Selectivity , 1970 .

[33]  P. McGregor,et al.  Strophe length and response to playback in great tits , 1992, Animal Behaviour.

[34]  K. Gaston,et al.  Daytime noise predicts nocturnal singing in urban robins , 2007, Biology Letters.

[35]  R. W. Ficken,et al.  Short-term temporal avoidance of interspecific acoustic interference among forest birds , 1985 .

[36]  F. Wasserman Intraspecific acoustical interference in the white-throated sparrow (Zonotrichia albicollis) , 1977, Animal Behaviour.

[37]  P. Marler,et al.  Sound transmission and its significance for animal vocalization , 1977, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[38]  R. Johnstone,et al.  Begging the question: are offspring solicitation behaviours signals of need? , 1997, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[39]  G. Cardoso,et al.  Female and male serins (Serinus serinus) respond differently to derived song traits , 2007, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[40]  Ruud Foppen,et al.  The Effects of Car Traffic on Breeding Bird Populations in Woodland. I. Evidence of Reduced Habitat Quality for Willow Warblers (Phylloscopus trochilus) Breeding Close to a Highway , 1994 .

[41]  S. Melamed,et al.  The effects of chronic industrial noise exposure on urinary cortisol, fatigue and irritability: a controlled field experiment. , 1996, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[42]  G. Ritchison,et al.  The Function of Singing in Female Black-Headed Grosbeaks (Pheucticus melanocephalus): Family-Group Maintenance , 1983 .

[43]  A. Hoelzel Song characteristics and response to playback of male and female Robins Erithacus rubecula , 2008 .

[44]  R J Dooling,et al.  Control of vocal intensity in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): differential reinforcement of vocal intensity and the Lombard effect. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[45]  B. Urbain,et al.  SONG SPARROW (MELOSPIZA MELODIA) SONG VARIES WITH URBAN NOISE , 2006 .

[46]  Effects of underwater noise on auditory sensitivity of a cyprinid fish , 2000 .

[47]  Esteban Fernández-Juricic,et al.  Microhabitat Selection and Singing Behavior Patterns of Male House Finches ( Carpodacus mexicanus ) in Urban Parks in a Heavily Urbanized Landscape in the Western U . S . * , 2006 .

[48]  C.J.F. ter Braak,et al.  The effects of car traffic on breeding bird populations in woodland. Ill. Reduction of density in relation to the proximity of main roads , 1995 .

[49]  H. Brumm The impact of environmental noise on song amplitude in a territorial bird , 2004 .

[50]  A. Muzet Environmental noise, sleep and health. , 2007, Sleep medicine reviews.

[51]  H. Brumm,et al.  Acoustic Communication in Noise , 2005 .

[52]  Clive K. Catchpole,et al.  9 – The Evolution of Bird Sounds in Relation to Mating and Spacing Behavior , 1982 .

[53]  H. Slabbekoorn,et al.  Birdsong and male—male competition: Causes and consequences of vocal variability in the collared dove (Streptopelia decaocto) , 2002 .

[54]  T. Dabelsteen,et al.  Song-based species discrimination and behaviour assessment by female blackbirds, Turdus merula , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[55]  S. Nowicki,et al.  Individual variation in response to simulated territorial challenge among territory-holding song sparrows , 2002 .

[56]  D. Kroodsma Reproductive Development in a Female Songbird: Differential Stimulation by Quality of Male Song , 1976, Science.

[57]  James H. Brown,et al.  Song Asynchrony in Neighbouring Bird Species , 1969, Nature.

[58]  Gail L. Patricelli,et al.  AVIAN COMMUNICATION IN URBAN NOISE: CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES OF VOCAL ADJUSTMENT , 2006 .

[59]  J C Junqua,et al.  The Lombard reflex and its role on human listeners and automatic speech recognizers. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[60]  Marcel Eens,et al.  Male song as a cue for mate choice in the European starling , 1991 .

[61]  Ruth Mace,et al.  The dawn chorus in the great tit Paras major is directly related to female fertility , 1987, Nature.

[62]  R. Dooling,et al.  Detection and discrimination of natural calls in masking noise by birds: estimating the active space of a signal , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[63]  P. Slater,et al.  Testing female chaffinch song preferences by operant conditioning , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[64]  T. Balsby,et al.  The meaning of song repertoire size and song length to male whitethroats Sylvia communis , 2001, Behavioural Processes.

[65]  D. Todt,et al.  Acoustic communication in noise: regulation of call characteristics in a New World monkey , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[66]  D. Wallschläger,et al.  Correlation of song frequency and body weight in passerine birds , 1980, Experientia.

[67]  J. Krebs,et al.  Song repertoires and territory defence in the great tit , 1978, Nature.