Free Energy Calculation Guided Virtual Screening of Synthetically Feasible Ligand R-Group and Scaffold Modifications: An Emerging Paradigm for Lead Optimization

Abstract Virtual screening of small-molecule collections has become a widespread practice both in academic laboratories and in pharmaceutical companies to rapidly and inexpensively identify small molecules which bind to the intended target with sufficient affinity to facilitate initiation of a drug discovery project. However, this approach of computationally evaluating very large numbers of small molecules, and then selecting a small subset of these for additional experimental prosecution is seldom employed in the lead optimization phase of drug discovery project. Recent work enabling programmatic enumeration of the synthetically tractable idea space around the most promising lead molecules when appropriately combined with high-accuracy protein–ligand binding free energy calculations appears poised to allow this emerging paradigm to make great contributions to lead optimization.

[1]  E. Lionta,et al.  Structure-Based Virtual Screening for Drug Discovery: Principles, Applications and Recent Advances , 2014, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[2]  William L Jorgensen,et al.  Computer-aided discovery of anti-HIV agents. , 2016, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry.

[3]  Robert Abel,et al.  Advancing Drug Discovery through Enhanced Free Energy Calculations. , 2017, Accounts of chemical research.

[4]  Yang Liu,et al.  Route Designer: A Retrosynthetic Analysis Tool Utilizing Automated Retrosynthetic Rule Generation , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[5]  Richard D. Taylor,et al.  Improved protein–ligand docking using GOLD , 2003, Proteins.

[6]  Matthew P. Repasky,et al.  WScore: A Flexible and Accurate Treatment of Explicit Water Molecules in Ligand-Receptor Docking. , 2016, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[7]  Yanli Wang,et al.  Structure-Based Virtual Screening for Drug Discovery: a Problem-Centric Review , 2012, The AAPS Journal.

[8]  Mark McGann,et al.  FRED Pose Prediction and Virtual Screening Accuracy , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[9]  Michael J. Bodkin,et al.  Accurate calculation of the absolute free energy of binding for drug molecules , 2015, Chemical science.

[10]  J C Baber,et al.  Predicting synthetic accessibility: application in drug discovery and development. , 2004, Mini reviews in medicinal chemistry.

[11]  A. Abate,et al.  Ultrahigh-throughput screening in drop-based microfluidics for directed evolution , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Lin-Li Li,et al.  RASA: A Rapid Retrosynthesis-Based Scoring Method for the Assessment of Synthetic Accessibility of Drug-like Molecules , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[13]  Charles C. Persinger,et al.  How to improve R&D productivity: the pharmaceutical industry's grand challenge , 2010, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[14]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[15]  Silas Memory Madondo The American Statistical Association (ASA) Statement of 2016 on Statistical Significance and P-value: A Critical Thought , 2017 .

[16]  E. Corey,et al.  Computer-assisted analysis in organic synthesis. , 1985, Science.

[17]  Jennifer L. Knight,et al.  Accurate and reliable prediction of relative ligand binding potency in prospective drug discovery by way of a modern free-energy calculation protocol and force field. , 2015, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[18]  P. Stolley,et al.  When genius errs: R.A. Fisher and the lung cancer controversy. , 1991, American journal of epidemiology.

[19]  Atli Thorarensen,et al.  Imidazotriazines: Spleen Tyrosine Kinase (Syk) Inhibitors Identified by Free‐Energy Perturbation (FEP) , 2016, ChemMedChem.

[20]  Paul D Lyne,et al.  Structure-based virtual screening: an overview. , 2002, Drug discovery today.

[21]  Robert Abel,et al.  A Critical Review of Validation, Blind Testing, and Real- World Use of Alchemical Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculations. , 2017, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[22]  X. Langlois,et al.  Pyrido[4,3-e][1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-a]pyrazines as Selective, Brain Penetrant Phosphodiesterase 2 (PDE2) Inhibitors. , 2015, ACS medicinal chemistry letters.

[23]  Jennifer L. Knight,et al.  OPLS3: A Force Field Providing Broad Coverage of Drug-like Small Molecules and Proteins. , 2016, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[24]  Matthew P. Repasky,et al.  Extra precision glide: docking and scoring incorporating a model of hydrophobic enclosure for protein-ligand complexes. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[25]  Robert Abel,et al.  Accelerating drug discovery through tight integration of expert molecular design and predictive scoring. , 2017, Current opinion in structural biology.

[26]  Jérôme Hert,et al.  Prospective Evaluation of Free Energy Calculations for the Prioritization of Cathepsin L Inhibitors. , 2017, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[27]  Hege S. Beard,et al.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 2. Enrichment factors in database screening. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[28]  Woody Sherman,et al.  Predicting Binding Affinities for GPCR Ligands Using Free-Energy Perturbation , 2016, ACS omega.

[29]  S. Rees,et al.  Principles of early drug discovery , 2011, British journal of pharmacology.

[30]  Ajay N. Jain Surflex: fully automatic flexible molecular docking using a molecular similarity-based search engine. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[31]  Peter V Coveney,et al.  Rapid, Accurate, Precise, and Reliable Relative Free Energy Prediction Using Ensemble Based Thermodynamic Integration. , 2017, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[32]  Scott P. Brown,et al.  Healthy skepticism: assessing realistic model performance. , 2009, Drug discovery today.

[33]  J. Bajorath,et al.  Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[34]  Markus Hartenfeller,et al.  A Collection of Robust Organic Synthesis Reactions for In Silico Molecule Design , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[35]  Matthew P. Repasky,et al.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.