Tensile Tests on Individual Single‐Walled Carbon Nanotubes: Linking Nanotube Strength with Its Defects

www.MaterialsViews.com C O M M U Tensile Tests on Individual Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes: Linking Nanotube Strength with Its Defects N IC A By Ming-Sheng Wang , * Dmitri Golberg , * and Yoshio Bando IO N Superb toughness of CNTs, seamless cylinders made of graphene sheets, has attracted prime attention of mechanical engineers. Theoretical calculations predict that an ideal single-walled carbon nanotube (SWNT) possesses an extremely high tensile strength of 75–135 GPa, depending on tube chirality. [ 1–3 ] However, most previous experimental results from several groups have typically been less sound. [ 4–7 ] Taking Yu et al.’s report as an example, tensile tests on 19 individual multi-walled nanotubes (MWNTs) pointed at the failure strengths of 11–63 GPa, with a mean value of only 28 GPa. [ 4 ] These theory-experiment discrepancies actually arise from the presence of structural defects in nanotubes introduced during their growth and/or post-growth treatments. Although the effects of such defects on tube fracture have only been computed via e.g. quantum mechanical or molecular mechanical calculations, [ 2 ] an experimental study clearly linking the nanotube defects to its fracture strength has not been available to date. Furthermore, the processes of defect nucleation, their propagation and relations to the tube failure at loading have also remained elusive and untested. We also noted that till now, only a few sets of CNT fracture measurements have been reported for any tube structure, either individual MWNTs or ropes of SWNTs. In addition, experimental data on such structures suffers from various uncertainties arising from e.g. interlayer (or intra-tube) load transfer, layer and/or tube sliding, and the estimation of an effective cross-sectional area. Also, the outermost layer of MWNTs usually has a much larger diameter than the model SWNTs used in most of theoretical calculations. This discrepancy brings other complications for the direct comparison between experimental results and theoretical simulations. The only direct and most reliable way is to take an individual SWNT and to conduct a direct strength measurement on it. Such experiment would be highly desirable for both experimentalists and theoreticians within the Nanotube community. [ 8 ] However, the extremely small dimensions, e.g. a diameter of a few nanometers, and a micrometer scale length impose a tremendous burden on an experimentalist. The diffi culties include visualizing, picking and placing of such tiny, fl exible individual SWNTs followed by nanoclamp fabrication within a force-sensor microdevice. Although some mechanical

[1]  Y. Bando,et al.  Interface Dynamic Behavior Between a Carbon Nanotube and Metal Electrode , 2010, Advanced materials.

[2]  F. Banhart,et al.  Multibranched Junctions of Carbon Nanotubes via Cobalt Particles , 2009 .

[3]  F. Banhart,et al.  Cobalt nanoparticle-assisted engineering of multiwall carbon nanotubes. , 2009, ACS nano.

[4]  J. Zuo,et al.  Beam to String Transition of Vibrating Carbon Nanotubes Under Axial Tension , 2009 .

[5]  Mark A. Locascio,et al.  Measurements of near-ultimate strength for multiwalled carbon nanotubes and irradiation-induced crosslinking improvements. , 2008, Nature nanotechnology.

[6]  Dmitri Golberg,et al.  Direct Force Measurements and Kinking under Elastic Deformation of Individual Multiwalled Boron Nitride Nanotubes , 2007 .

[7]  T. Belytschko,et al.  Nanoscale fracture mechanics. , 2007, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[8]  Feng Ding,et al.  How evaporating carbon nanotubes retain their perfection? , 2007, Nano letters.

[9]  B. Yakobson,et al.  Pseudoclimb and dislocation dynamics in superplastic nanotubes. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[10]  Rodney S. Ruoff,et al.  Modulus, Fracture Strength, and Brittle vs. Plastic Response of the Outer Shell of Arc-grown Multi-walled Carbon Nanotubes , 2007 .

[11]  T. D. Yuzvinsky,et al.  Shrinking a carbon nanotube. , 2006, Nano letters.

[12]  Z. Suo,et al.  Kink formation and motion in carbon nanotubes at high temperatures. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[13]  Traian Dumitrica,et al.  Symmetry-, time-, and temperature-dependent strength of carbon nanotubes. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  M. Dresselhaus,et al.  Superplastic carbon nanotubes , 2006, Nature.

[15]  Linda S. Schadler,et al.  On the tensile strength distribution of multiwalled carbon nanotubes , 2005 .

[16]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  Mechanics of defects in carbon nanotubes: Atomistic and multiscale simulations , 2005 .

[17]  T. Belytschko,et al.  The role of vacancy defects and holes in the fracture of carbon nanotubes , 2004 .

[18]  Y. Shibutani,et al.  Ideal tensile strength and band gap of single-walled carbon nanotubes , 2003 .

[19]  T. Belytschko,et al.  Bond-breaking bifurcation states in carbon nanotube fracture , 2003 .

[20]  Dong Qian,et al.  Mechanics of carbon nanotubes , 2002 .

[21]  Yang Wang,et al.  Direct Mechanical Measurement of the Tensile Strength and Elastic Modulus of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes , 2002, Microscopy and Microanalysis.

[22]  R. Ruoff,et al.  Tensile loading of ropes of single wall carbon nanotubes and their mechanical properties , 2000, Physical review letters.

[23]  R. Ruoff,et al.  Strength and breaking mechanism of multiwalled carbon nanotubes under tensile load , 2000, Science.

[24]  Deron A. Walters,et al.  Elastic strain of freely suspended single-wall carbon nanotube ropes , 1999 .

[25]  Erik Dujardin,et al.  Young's modulus of single-walled nanotubes , 1998 .

[26]  Pulickel M. Ajayan,et al.  Nanometre-size tubes of carbon , 1997 .

[27]  J. Bernholc,et al.  Nanomechanics of carbon tubes: Instabilities beyond linear response. , 1996, Physical review letters.