Multichannel Microfluidic Platform for Temporal-Spatial Investigation of Niche Roles of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli within a Dual-Species Biofilm

In natural or man-made environments, microorganisms exist predominantly as biofilms forming surface-associated bacterial communities embedded in extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs). Often, biofilm reactors used for endpoint and disruptive analyses of biofilm are not suitable for periodic observation of biofilm formation and development. ABSTRACT In natural or man-made environments, microorganisms exist predominantly as biofilms forming surface-associated bacterial communities embedded in extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs). Often, biofilm reactors used for endpoint and disruptive analyses of biofilm are not suitable for periodic observation of biofilm formation and development. In this study, a microfluidic device designed with multiple channels and a gradient generator was used for high-throughput analysis and real-time monitoring of dual-species biofilm formation and development. We compared the structural parameters of monospecies and dual-species biofilms containing Pseudomonas aeruginosa (expressing mCherry) and Escherichia coli (expressing green fluorescent protein [GFP]) to understand the interactions in the biofilm. The rate of biovolume increase of each species in monospecies biofilm (2.7 × 105 μm3) was higher than those in a dual-species biofilm (9.68 × 104 μm3); however, synergism was still observed in the dual-species biofilm due to overall increases in biovolume for both species. Synergism was also observed in a dual-species biofilm, where P. aeruginosa forms a “blanket” over E. coli, providing a physical barrier against shear stress in the environment. The microfluidic chip was useful for monitoring the dual-species biofilm in the microenvironment, indicating that different species in a multispecies biofilm exhibit different niches for the survival of the biofilm community. Finally, we demonstrated that the nucleic acids can be extracted from the dual-species biofilm in situ after biofilm imaging analysis. In addition, gene expression supported that the activation and suppression of different quorum sensing genes resulted in the different phenotype seen in the biofilm. This study showed that the integration of microfluidic device with microscopy analysis and molecular techniques could be a promising tool for studying biofilm structure and gene quantification and expression simultaneously. IMPORTANCE In natural or man-made environments, microorganisms exist predominantly as biofilms forming surface-associated bacterial communities embedded in extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs). Often, biofilm reactors used for endpoint and disruptive analyses of biofilm are not suitable for periodic observation of biofilm formation and development. Here, we demonstrate that a microfluidic device with multiple channels and a gradient generator can be useful for high-throughput analysis and real-time monitoring of dual-species biofilm formation and development. Our study revealed synergism in the dual-species biofilm, where P. aeruginosa forms a “blanket” over E. coli, providing a physical barrier against shear stress in the environment. Furthermore, different species in a multispecies biofilm exhibit different niches for the survival of the biofilm community. This study showed that the integration of microfluidic device with microscopy analysis and molecular techniques could be a promising tool for studying biofilm structure and gene quantification and expression simultaneously.

[1]  M. Burmølle,et al.  The biofilm life cycle: expanding the conceptual model of biofilm formation , 2022, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[2]  A. de Vicente,et al.  A Noninvasive Method for Time-Lapse Imaging of Microbial Interactions and Colony Dynamics , 2022, Microbiology spectrum.

[3]  Joong Ho Shin,et al.  Real-time monitoring of mono- and dual-species biofilm formation and eradication using microfluidic platform , 2022, Scientific Reports.

[4]  R. Garside,et al.  Existing evidence on antibiotic resistance exposure and transmission to humans from the environment: a systematic map , 2022, Environmental Evidence.

[5]  J. Lawrence,et al.  Environmental Biofilms as Reservoirs for Antimicrobial Resistance , 2021, Frontiers in Microbiology.

[6]  Xiangdong Xu,et al.  Abundance and Dynamic Distribution of Antibiotic Resistance Genes in the Environment Surrounding a Veterinary Antibiotic Manufacturing Site , 2021, Antibiotics.

[7]  C. Nadell,et al.  Both Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Candida albicans Accumulate Greater Biomass in Dual-Species Biofilms under Flow , 2021, mSphere.

[8]  S. Gould,et al.  Visualisation and biovolume quantification in the characterisation of biofilm formation in Mycoplasma fermentans , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[9]  J. Bengtsson-Palme,et al.  Microbial Community Interactions Are Sensitive to Small Changes in Temperature , 2021, Frontiers in Microbiology.

[10]  S. Ha,et al.  Effects of environmental conditions (temperature, pH, and glucose) on biofilm formation of Salmonella enterica serotype Kentucky and virulence gene expression , 2021, Poultry science.

[11]  O. Bernard,et al.  Shear stress affects the architecture and cohesion of Chlorella vulgaris biofilms , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[12]  G. Hwang,et al.  Implication of Surface Properties, Bacterial Motility, and Hydrodynamic Conditions on Bacterial Surface Sensing and Their Initial Adhesion , 2021, Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology.

[13]  Riti Mann,et al.  We Are One: Multispecies Metabolism of a Biofilm Consortium and Their Treatment Strategies , 2021, Frontiers in Microbiology.

[14]  H. Berthoud,et al.  Development of a High-Throughput Microfluidic qPCR System for the Quantitative Determination of Quality-Relevant Bacteria in Cheese , 2021, Frontiers in Microbiology.

[15]  C. Nadell,et al.  Quantitative image analysis of microbial communities with BiofilmQ , 2021, Nature Microbiology.

[16]  Andrew K. Dickerson,et al.  Hydrodynamics and surface properties influence biofilm proliferation. , 2020, Advances in colloid and interface science.

[17]  Johan Bengtsson-Palme,et al.  Microbial model communities: To understand complexity, harness the power of simplicity , 2020, Computational and structural biotechnology journal.

[18]  Jin Sun,et al.  Exploring the Influence of Signal Molecules on Marine Biofilms Development , 2020, Frontiers in Microbiology.

[19]  Minh Tam Tran Thi,et al.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms , 2020, International journal of molecular sciences.

[20]  B. Li,et al.  Deciphering the mobility and bacterial hosts of antibiotic resistance genes under antibiotic selection pressure by metagenomic assembly and binning approaches. , 2020, Water research.

[21]  S. Rice,et al.  Influence of interspecies interactions on the spatial organization of dual species bacterial communities , 2020, Biofilm.

[22]  R. Stocker,et al.  A microfluidic platform for characterizing the structure and rheology of biofilm streamers , 2020, bioRxiv.

[23]  V. Vishwakarma Impact of environmental biofilms: Industrial components and its remediation , 2019, Journal of basic microbiology.

[24]  R. Irizarry ggplot2 , 2019, Introduction to Data Science.

[25]  M. Chevrette,et al.  Experimental Microbiomes: Models Not to Scale , 2019, mSystems.

[26]  H. Daims,et al.  A Multicolor Fluorescence in situ Hybridization Approach Using an Extended Set of Fluorophores to Visualize Microorganisms , 2019, Front. Microbiol..

[27]  S. Ishii,et al.  A microfluidic platform for the simultaneous quantification of methanogen populations in anaerobic digestion processes , 2019, Environmental microbiology.

[28]  A. Keucken,et al.  Bacterial release from pipe biofilm in a full-scale drinking water distribution system , 2019, npj Biofilms and Microbiomes.

[29]  S. Wuertz,et al.  Bacteria and archaea on Earth and their abundance in biofilms , 2019, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[30]  Sergey V. Balashov,et al.  Genome rearrangements induce biofilm formation in Escherichia coli C – an old model organism with a new application in biofilm research , 2019, bioRxiv.

[31]  M. Roudbary,et al.  What are the advantages of living in a community? A microbial biofilm perspective! , 2018, Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz.

[32]  Tandoi,et al.  Biofilm growth and control in cooling water industrial systems , 2018, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[33]  Anália Lourenço,et al.  Critical review on biofilm methods , 2017, Critical reviews in microbiology.

[34]  O. Ces,et al.  Hydrophilic surface modification of PDMS for droplet microfluidics using a simple, quick, and robust method via PVA deposition , 2017, Microsystems & Nanoengineering.

[35]  R. Stocker,et al.  Biofilm disruption by an air bubble reveals heterogeneous age-dependent detachment patterns dictated by initial extracellular matrix distribution , 2017, npj Biofilms and Microbiomes.

[36]  Fengan Yu,et al.  Environmental Pseudomonads Inhibit Cystic Fibrosis Patient-Derived Pseudomonas aeruginosa , 2016, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[37]  Jeffrey T Leek,et al.  Transcript-level expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with HISAT, StringTie and Ballgown , 2016, Nature Protocols.

[38]  E. Torrents,et al.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa Exhibits Deficient Biofilm Formation in the Absence of Class II and III Ribonucleotide Reductases Due to Hindered Anaerobic Growth , 2016, Front. Microbiol..

[39]  S. Rice,et al.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 exopolysaccharides are important for mixed species biofilm community development and stress tolerance , 2015, Front. Microbiol..

[40]  Eric P. Skaar,et al.  Adhesive Fiber Stratification in Uropathogenic Escherichia coli Biofilms Unveils Oxygen-Mediated Control of Type 1 Pili , 2015, PLoS pathogens.

[41]  R. Eckert Emphasis on biofilms can improve mitigation of microbiologically influenced corrosion in oil and gas industry , 2015 .

[42]  W. Huber,et al.  Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2 , 2014, Genome Biology.

[43]  A. Packman,et al.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa Promotes Escherichia coli Biofilm Formation in Nutrient-Limited Medium , 2014, PloS one.

[44]  D. Newman,et al.  Phenazine redox cycling enhances anaerobic survival in Pseudomonas aeruginosa by facilitating generation of ATP and a proton‐motive force , 2014, Molecular microbiology.

[45]  Thomas Bjarnsholt,et al.  Interactions in multispecies biofilms: do they actually matter? , 2014, Trends in microbiology.

[46]  K. Stokes,et al.  Life under flow: A novel microfluidic device for the assessment of anti-biofilm technologies. , 2013, Biomicrofluidics.

[47]  S. Rice,et al.  Biofilm development and enhanced stress resistance of a model, mixed-species community biofilm , 2013, The ISME Journal.

[48]  D. Harhay,et al.  Mixed biofilm formation by Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium enhanced bacterial resistance to sanitization due to extracellular polymeric substances. , 2013, Journal of food protection.

[49]  Weijun Luo,et al.  Pathview: an R/Bioconductor package for pathway-based data integration and visualization , 2013, Bioinform..

[50]  Ehud Banin,et al.  Multi-species biofilms: living with friendly neighbors. , 2012, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[51]  Junghyun Kim,et al.  Microfluidic Approaches to Bacterial Biofilm Formation , 2012, Molecules.

[52]  Johannes E. Schindelin,et al.  Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis , 2012, Nature Methods.

[53]  Guangchuang Yu,et al.  clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. , 2012, Omics : a journal of integrative biology.

[54]  Axel Günther,et al.  Bubbles no more: in-plane trapping and removal of bubbles in microfluidic devices. , 2012, Lab on a chip.

[55]  M. Vieira,et al.  Discriminating Multi-Species Populations in Biofilms with Peptide Nucleic Acid Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (PNA FISH) , 2011, PloS one.

[56]  Hadley Wickham,et al.  ggplot2 - Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (2nd Edition) , 2017 .

[57]  Fred L. Drake,et al.  Python 3 Reference Manual , 2009 .

[58]  P. Stewart,et al.  Escherichia coli O157:H7 requires colonizing partner to adhere and persist in a capillary flow cell. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[59]  C. Sze,et al.  Dual fluorescence system for flow cytometric analysis of Escherichia coli transcriptional response in multi-species context. , 2009, Journal of microbiological methods.

[60]  Patrick De Boever,et al.  Use of the rotating wall vessel technology to study the effect of shear stress on growth behaviour of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA01. , 2008, Environmental microbiology.

[61]  C. Fuqua,et al.  Quorum sensing and motility mediate interactions between Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Agrobacterium tumefaciens in biofilm cocultures. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[62]  Paul Stoodley,et al.  Bacterial biofilms: from the Natural environment to infectious diseases , 2004, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[63]  Philip S. Stewart,et al.  Diffusion in Biofilms , 2003, Journal of bacteriology.

[64]  N. High,et al.  Bacterial coaggregation: an integral process in the development of multi-species biofilms. , 2003, Trends in microbiology.

[65]  R. Kolter,et al.  Exopolysaccharide Production Is Required for Development of Escherichia coli K-12 Biofilm Architecture , 2000, Journal of bacteriology.

[66]  P A Wilderer,et al.  Automated Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy and Semiautomated Image Processing for Analysis of Biofilms , 1998, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[67]  J J Heijnen,et al.  Mathematical modeling of biofilm structure with a hybrid differential-discrete cellular automaton approach. , 1998, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[68]  Carla C. C. R. de Carvalho Marine Biofilms: A Successful Microbial Strategy With Economic Implications , 2018, Front. Mar. Sci..