Performance evaluation of fiber optic probes for tissue lifetime fluorescence spectroscopy

The design of fiber-optic probes plays an important role in optical spectroscopic studies, including fluorescence spectroscopy of biological tissues. It can affect the light delivery and propagation into the tissue, the collection efficiency (total number of photons collected vs. total number of photons launched) and the origin of collected light. This in turn affects the signal to noise ratio (SNR) and the extend of tissue interrogation, thus influencing the diagnostic value of such techniques. Three specific fiber-optic probe designs were tested both experimentally and computationally via Monte Carlo simulations. In particular, the effects of probe architecture (single-fiber vs. two bifurcated multifiber probes), probe-to-target distance (PTD), and source-to-detector separation (SDS) were investigated on the collected diffuse reflectance of a Lambertian target and an agar-based tissue phantom. This study demonstrated that probe architecture, PTD, and SDS are closely intertwined and considerably affect the light collection efficiency, the extend of target illumination, and the origin of the collected reflected light. Our findings can be applied towards optimization of fiber-optic probe designs for quantitative fluorescence spectroscopy of diseased tissues.

[1]  L. Grossweiner,et al.  Reflection and transmission coefficients in plane-parallel layers with refractive-index mismatch. , 1992, Applied optics.

[2]  B W Pogue,et al.  Fiber-optic bundle design for quantitative fluorescence measurement from tissue. , 1998, Applied optics.

[3]  L. Grossweiner,et al.  Singlet oxygen generation by Photofrin in homogeneous and light-scattering media. , 1994, Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology.

[4]  S L Jacques,et al.  Measurement of tissue optical properties by the use of oblique-incidence optical fiber reflectometry. , 1997, Applied optics.

[5]  S. A. Prahl,et al.  A Monte Carlo model of light propagation in tissue , 1989, Other Conferences.

[6]  J. Mourant,et al.  Monitoring photosensitizer concentration by use of a fiber-optic probe with a small source-detector separation. , 2000, Applied optics.

[7]  Stanley M. Angel,et al.  Comparative Study of Some Fiber-Optic Remote Raman Probe Designs. Part II: Tests of Single-Fiber, Lensed, and Flat- and Bevel-Tip Multi-Fiber Probes , 1996 .

[8]  R. Richards-Kortum,et al.  Fiber optic probes for biomedical optical spectroscopy. , 2003, Journal of biomedical optics.

[9]  I J Bigio,et al.  Measuring absorption coefficients in small volumes of highly scattering media: source-detector separations for which path lengths do not depend on scattering properties. , 1997, Applied optics.

[10]  Norman S. Nishioka,et al.  Light propagation in tissue during fluorescence spectroscopy with single-fiber probes , 2001 .

[11]  N Ramanujam,et al.  In vivo diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia using 337-nm-excited laser-induced fluorescence. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  T Joshua Pfefer,et al.  Selective detection of fluorophore layers in turbid media: the role of fiber-optic probe design. , 2003, Optics letters.

[13]  S. Angel,et al.  Comparative Study of Some Fiber-Optic Remote Raman Probe Designs. Part I: Model for Liquids and Transparent Solids , 1996 .

[14]  Brian C. Wilson,et al.  Study of Fiber-Optic Probes for in vivo Medical Raman Spectroscopy , 1999 .

[15]  Nirmala Ramanujam,et al.  Relationship between depth of a target in a turbid medium and fluorescence measured by a variable-aperture method. , 2002, Optics letters.

[16]  T Joshua Pfefer,et al.  Multiple-fiber probe design for fluorescence spectroscopy in tissue. , 2002, Applied optics.