Integrating specific knowledge: insights from the Kennedy Space Center

This paper presents a theoretical model of knowledge integration, by developing a classification of types of specific knowledge (context-specific, technology-specific, and context-and-technology-specific) and examining the effects of four knowledge integration mechanisms (exchange, direction, socialization, and internalization) on the integration of these knowledge types. Based on prior literature, we argue that: 1) different types of specific knowledge are characterized by different levels of common knowledge; 2) different knowledge integration mechanisms require different levels of common knowledge; and 3) integration mechanisms can be matched with knowledge types based on efficiency/effectiveness considerations. Empirical research at the John F. Kennedy Space Center, which involved two rounds of interviews and a questionnaires survey of 159 individuals, explores the relationships among the four knowledge integration mechanisms, the three types of specific knowledge, and satisfaction with knowledge integration. Results indicate that exchange, socialization, and internalization support the integration of context-specific, technology-specific, and context-and-technology-specific types of knowledge, respectively. Direction and internalization, but not exchange and socialization, influence satisfaction with knowledge integration. Implications for practice and future research are examined.

[1]  David F. Larcker,et al.  Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics: , 1981 .

[2]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[3]  R. Grant Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[4]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  Into the black box: the knowledge transformation cycle , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[5]  K. Jöreskog Structural analysis of covariance and correlation matrices , 1978 .

[6]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Integrating Knowledge in Groups: How Formal Interventions Enable Flexibility , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[7]  Sundar G. Bharadwaj,et al.  The quality and effectiveness of marketing strategy: Effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict in intraorganizational relationships , 1996 .

[8]  A OkhuysenGerardo,et al.  Integrating Knowledge in Groups , 2002 .

[9]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Organizational Knowledge Management: A Contingency Perspective , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[10]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[11]  S. Scott,et al.  DETERMINANTS OF INNOVATIVE BEHAVIOR: A PATH MODEL OF INDIVIDUAL INNOVATION IN THE WORKPLACE , 1994 .

[12]  Barry J. Babin,et al.  Employee Behavior in a Service Environment: A Model and Test of Potential Differences between Men and Women: , 1998 .

[13]  Akira Takeishi,et al.  Special Issue: Knowledge, Knowing, and Organizations: Knowledge Partitioning in the Interfirm Division of Labor: The Case of Automotive Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[14]  Fritz Machlup,et al.  Knowledge : its creation, distribution, and economic significance , 1980 .

[15]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge and the Speed of the Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities: An Empirical Test , 1995 .

[16]  Vivek Choudhury,et al.  Information Specificity and Environmental Scanning: An Economic Perspective , 1997, MIS Q..

[17]  Larry C. Giunipero,et al.  Organizational Learning in Global Purchasing: A Model and Test of Internal Users and Corporate Buyers , 2000, Decis. Sci..

[18]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[19]  Amit Das,et al.  Knowledge and Productivity in Technical Support Work , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[20]  PostrelSteven Islands of Shared Knowledge , 2002 .

[21]  Glenn B. Voss,et al.  The Influence of Multiple Store Environment Cues on Perceived Merchandise Value and Patronage Intentions , 2002 .

[22]  Hisham M. E. Abdelsalam,et al.  A simulation-based optimization framework for product development cycle time reduction , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[23]  K. R. Conner,et al.  A Resource-Based Theory of the Firm: Knowledge Versus Opportunism , 1996 .

[24]  TakeishiAkira Knowledge Partitioning in the Interfirm Division of Labor , 2002 .

[25]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Structural Equations with Latent Variables , 1989 .

[26]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[27]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Specific and General Knowledge and Organizational Structure , 1995 .

[28]  Carla O'Dell,et al.  If Only We Knew What We Know , 1998 .

[29]  John Hyman,et al.  How Knowledge Works , 1999 .

[30]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  An Empirical Study of the Effect of Knowledge Management Processes at Individual, Group, and Organizational Levels , 2003, Decis. Sci..

[31]  J. Spender Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm , 1996 .

[32]  K. Weick,et al.  Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. , 1993 .

[33]  B. Kogut,et al.  Exploring internal stickiness : Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 2007 .

[34]  R. Heck,et al.  Organizational Culture and Performance: Proposing and Testing a Model , 1993 .

[35]  Carla O'Dell,et al.  If Only We Knew What We Know: The Transfer of Internal Knowledge and Best Practice , 1998 .

[36]  Margaret A. Neale,et al.  Who's Really Sharing? Effects of Social and Expert Status on Knowledge Exchange Within Groups , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[37]  Oana I. Spulber,et al.  Innovation in power semiconductor industry: past and future , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[38]  R. Brandis The Limits of Organization , 1975 .

[39]  Amalya L. Oliver,et al.  Social Networks, Learning, and Flexibility: Sourcing Scientific Knowledge in New Biotechnology Firms , 1994 .

[40]  Paul S. Adler,et al.  When knowledge is the critical resource, knowledge management is the critical task , 1989 .

[41]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[42]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[43]  Robert M. Grant,et al.  Knowledge and Organization , 2001 .

[44]  Michael J. Prietula,et al.  When Processes Learn: Steps Toward Crafting an Intelligent Organization , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[45]  F. Hayek The economic nature of the firm: The use of knowledge in society , 1945 .

[46]  D. Teece Capturing Value from Knowledge Assets: The New Economy, Markets for Know-How, and Intangible Assets , 1998 .

[47]  Pek-Hooi Soh,et al.  Technology alliances and networks: an external link to research capability , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[48]  J. Brown,et al.  Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective , 2001 .

[49]  H. Tsoukas The firm as a distributed knowledge system : A constructionist approach , 1996 .

[50]  R. Grant Chapter 8 – Prospering in Dynamically-Competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration , 1999 .

[51]  Robert M. Davison,et al.  Can lean media support knowledge sharing? Investigating a hidden advantage of process improvement , 2003, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[52]  M. Polanyi Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .

[53]  H. Demsetz The Theory of the Firm Revisited , 1988 .

[54]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[55]  K. Pavitt,et al.  Knowledge Specialization, Organizational Coupling, and the Boundaries of the Firm: Why Do Firms Know More than They Make? , 2001 .

[56]  Richard Huseman,et al.  Leading with Knowledge , 1999 .

[57]  Anil Gupta,et al.  Knowledge Management’s Social Dimension: Lessons from Nucor Steel , 2000 .

[58]  Steven Postrel,et al.  Special Issue: Knowledge, Knowing, and Organizations: Islands of Shared Knowledge: Specialization and Mutual Understanding in Problem-Solving Teams , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[59]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The Knowledge-Creating Company: How , 1995 .

[60]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Survival-enhancing learning in the Manhattan hotel industry , 1998 .

[61]  Daniel J. McAllister Affect- and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations , 1995 .

[62]  D. A. Craig,et al.  Development and utilization status of NASA's advanced engineering environment - ISE , 2001, 2001 IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01TH8542).

[63]  D. Dougherty A PRACTICE-CENTERED MODEL OF ORGANIZATIONAL RENEWAL THROUGH PRODUCT INNOVATION , 1992 .

[64]  John R. Carlson,et al.  Channel Expansion Theory and the Experiential Nature of Media Richness Perceptions , 1999 .

[65]  Susan K. Lippert,et al.  Utilization of information technology: examining cognitive and experiential factors of post-adoption behavior , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[66]  Anna Grandori,et al.  Dialogue on Organization and Knowledge , 2002 .

[67]  Maria L. Kraimer,et al.  A Social Capital Theory of Career Success , 2001 .

[68]  Scott Serich Prototype stopping rules in software development projects , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[69]  G. Susman,et al.  Advanced Manufacturing Technology and Organization Structure: Empowerment or Subordination? , 1992 .

[70]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[71]  Frank Shipper,et al.  VOTER BEHAVIOR IN UNION CERTIFICATION ELECTIONS: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY , 1993 .

[72]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[73]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Concept of “Ba”: Building a Foundation for Knowledge Creation , 1998 .