Alternative Networks: Toward Global Access to the Internet for All

It is often said that the Internet is ubiquitous in our daily lives, but this holds true only for those who can easily access it. In fact, billions of people are still digitally disconnected, as bringing connectivity to certain zones does not make a good business case. The only solution for these unsatisfied potential users is to directly undertake the building of the infrastructure required to obtaining access to the Internet, typically forming groups in order to share the corresponding cost. This article presents a global classification and a summary of the main characteristics of different Alternative Network deployments that have arisen in recent years with an aim to provide Internet services in places where mainstream network deployments do not exist or are not adequate solutions. The "Global Access to the Internet for All" Research Group of the Internet Research Task Force, where all authors actively participate, is interested in documenting these emerging deployments. As an outcome of this work, a classification has converged by consensus, where five criteria have been identified and, based on them, four different types of Alternative Networks have been identified and described with real-world examples. Such a classification is useful for a deeper understanding of the common characteristics behind existing and emerging Alternative Networks.

[1]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Metropolitan Wi-Fi Research Network at the Los Angeles State Historic Park , 2008, J. Community Informatics.

[2]  Mahesh K. Marina,et al.  Tegola tiered mesh network testbed in rural Scotland , 2008, WiNS-DR '08.

[3]  Francisco-Javier Simó-Reigadas,et al.  Modeling and Optimizing IEEE 802.11 DCF for Long-Distance Links , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[4]  Hanno Wirtz,et al.  Collaborative municipal Wi-Fi networks - challenges and opportunities , 2010, 2010 8th IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops).

[5]  Eric A. Brewer,et al.  The village base station , 2010, NSDR '10.

[6]  Carlos Rey-Moreno,et al.  A telemedicine WiFi network optimized for long distances in the Amazonian jungle of Peru , 2011, ExtremeCom.

[7]  Marco Zennaro,et al.  Low cost carrier independent telecommunications infrastructure , 2012, 2012 Global Information Infrastructure and Networking Symposium (GIIS).

[8]  Llorenç Cerdà-Alabern,et al.  On the topology characterization of Guifi.net , 2012, 2012 IEEE 8th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob).

[9]  Jon Crowcroft,et al.  LCD-Net: lowest cost denominator networking , 2013, CCRV.

[10]  Milena Radenkovic,et al.  A Feasibility Study of an In-the-Wild Experimental Public Access WiFi Network , 2014, ACM DEV-5 '14.

[11]  Francisco-Javier Simó-Reigadas,et al.  Sharing low-cost wireless infrastructures with telecommunications operators to bring 3G services to rural communities , 2015, Comput. Networks.

[12]  SCI facts and figures 2016. , 2016, The journal of spinal cord medicine.

[13]  Marco Zennaro,et al.  Alternative Network Deployments: Taxonomy, Characterization, Technologies, and Architectures , 2016, RFC.