A Knowledge Engineering Approach to Comparing Legislation

In the E-POWER project relevant tax legislation and business processes are modelled in UML to improve the speed and efficiency with which the Dutch Tax and Customs Administration can implement decision support systems for internal use and for its clients. These conceptual models have also proven their usefulness for efficient and effective analysis of draft legislation.We are currently researching whether conceptual modeling can also be used to compare 'similar' legislation from different jurisdictions. Better insight in the process of modeling and comparing legislation from different legislators is expected to improve the capacity of the Dutch Tax and Customs Administration to react to future consequences of increased movement of people, products, and money between EU member states and increased harmonization between tax authorities in Europe. In addition, the discovery of the requirements of comparing models is also expected to result in a more principled, more robust, and language-independent methodology for modeling legislation. This paper discusses known problems and requirements of comparing legislation, and the expected results of comparing models of legislation.

[1]  A. Valente,et al.  Legal Knowledge Engineering - A Modelling Approach , 1995 .

[2]  André Valente,et al.  ON-LINE: an architecture for modelling legal information , 1995, ICAIL '95.

[3]  Martin K. Purvis,et al.  UML as an Ontology Modelling Language , 1999, Intelligent Information Integration.

[4]  T. van Engers,et al.  The Role of Verification in Improving the Quality of Legal Decision-Making , 2001 .

[5]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  A Conjunctive Query Language for Description Logic Aboxes , 2000, AAAI/IAAI.

[6]  Diego Calvanese,et al.  A Framework for Ontology Integration , 2001, The Emerging Semantic Web.

[7]  H. Sofia Pinto,et al.  Some Issues on Ontology Integration , 1999, IJCAI 1999.

[8]  Alexander Boer MILE assessment: turning legal information into legal advice , 2001, 12th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications.

[9]  Radboud Winkels,et al.  METAlex: Legislation in XML , 2002 .

[10]  S. Winer,et al.  Economic and Political Foundations of Tax Structure , 1985 .

[11]  Joost Breuker,et al.  Constructing Normative Rules , 1996 .

[12]  A. M. Tjoa,et al.  Mile: Turning Legal Information into Legal Advice , 2001 .

[13]  E. Engelen,et al.  Financialization, Pension Restructuring, and the Logic of Funding , 2002 .

[14]  Radboud Winkels,et al.  Generating exception structures for legal information serving , 1999, ICAIL '99.

[15]  Aldo Gangemi,et al.  A Formal Ontology Framework to Represent Norm Dynamics , 2001 .

[16]  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon,et al.  Using values and theories to resolve disagreement in law 1 , 2000 .

[17]  J. Doyle,et al.  Representing Preferences as Ceteris Paribus Comparatives , 1994 .

[18]  Edwina L. Rissland,et al.  Detecting change in legal concepts , 1995, ICAIL '95.

[19]  S. Winer,et al.  Rules, Politics and the Normative Analysis of Taxation , 2005 .