Experimental study of ethylene counterflow diffusion flames perturbed by trace amounts of jet fuel and jet fuel surrogates under incipiently sooting conditions

The structure of an ethylene counterflow diffusion flame doped with 2000 ppm on a molar basis of either jet fuel or two jet fuel surrogates is studied under incipient sooting conditions. The doped flames have identical stoichiometric mixture fractions (zf = 0.18) and strain rates (a =9 2 s � 1 ), resulting in a welldefined and fixed temperature/time history for all of the flames. Gas samples are extracted from the flame with quartz microprobes for subsequent GC/MS analysis. Profiles of critical fuel decomposition products and soot precursors, such as benzene and toluene, are compared. The data for C7–C12 alkanes are consistent with typical decomposition of large alkanes with both surrogates showing good qualitative agreement with jet fuel in their pyrolysis trends. Olefins are formed as the fuel alkanes decompose, with agreement between the surrogates and jet fuel that improves for small alkenes, probably because of an increase in kinetic pathways which makes the specifics of the alkane structure less important. Good agreement between jet fuel and the surrogates is found with respect to critical soot precursors such as benzene and toluene. Although the six-component Utah/Yale surrogate performs better than the Aachen surrogate, the latter performs adequately and retains the advantage of simplicity, since it consists of only two components. The acetylene profiles present a unique multimodal behavior that can be attributed to acetylene’s participation in early stages of formation of soot precursors, such as benzene and other large pyrolysis products, as well as in the surface growth of soot particles.

[1]  Norbert Peters,et al.  A surrogate fuel for kerosene , 2009 .

[2]  R. J. Gill,et al.  The effects of molecular structure on soot formation II. Diffusion flames , 1985 .

[3]  George Sidebotham,et al.  Sooting behavior in temperature-controlled laminar diffusion flames☆ , 1984 .

[4]  Tiziano Faravelli,et al.  Lumping procedures in detailed kinetic modeling of gasification, pyrolysis, partial oxidation and combustion of hydrocarbon mixtures , 2001 .

[5]  R. Axelbaum,et al.  Soot inception limits in laminar diffusion flames with application to oxy-fuel combustion , 2008 .

[6]  Tiziano Faravelli,et al.  Experimental and kinetic modeling study of combustion of JP-8, its surrogates and reference components in laminar nonpremixed flows , 2007 .

[7]  C. Law,et al.  Dilution and Temperature Effects of Inert Addition on Soot Formation in Counterflow Diffusion Flames , 1988 .

[8]  Norbert Peters,et al.  Kinetic mechanisms for hydrocarbon ignition , 2002 .

[9]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[10]  B. L. Mantia,et al.  Experimental and computational study of methane counterflow diffusion flames perturbed by trace amounts of either jet fuel or a 6-component surrogate under non-sooting conditions , 2009 .

[11]  Tim Edwards,et al.  Ignition and extinction of non-premixed flames of single-component liquid hydrocarbons, jet fuels, and their surrogates , 2007 .

[12]  C. Shaddix,et al.  Oxidation of 1-methylnaphthalene , 1992 .

[13]  Tiziano Faravelli,et al.  Experimental formulation and kinetic model for JP-8 surrogate mixtures , 2002 .

[14]  Nicholas P. Cernansky,et al.  Experimental investigation of surrogates for jet and diesel fuels , 2008 .

[15]  Tiziano Faravelli,et al.  Computational and experimental study of JP-8, a surrogate, and its components in counterflow diffusion flames , 2004 .

[16]  C. McEnally,et al.  An Experimental Study in Non-Premixed Flames of Hydrocarbon Growth Processes that Involve Five-Membered Carbon Rings , 1998 .

[17]  A. Gomez,et al.  Chemical structure of a methane counterflow diffusion flame perturbed with the addition of either JP-8 or a jet fuel surrogate , 2009 .

[18]  Philippe Dagaut,et al.  The ignition, oxidation, and combustion of kerosene: A review of experimental and kinetic modeling , 2006 .

[19]  T. Edwards Liquid Fuels and Propellants for Aerospace Propulsion: 1903-2003 , 2003 .

[20]  Burak Atakan,et al.  Studies of aromatic hydrocarbon formation mechanisms in flames: Progress towards closing the fuel gap , 2006 .

[21]  H. F. Calcote,et al.  Effect of molecular structure on incipient soot formation , 1983 .

[22]  R. G. Butler,et al.  Cyclopentadiene combustion in a plug flow reactor near 1150 K , 2009 .

[23]  Ronald K. Hanson,et al.  Jet fuel ignition delay times: Shock tube experiments over wide conditions and surrogate model predictions , 2008 .

[24]  E. M. Bulewicz Combustion , 1964, Nature.

[25]  Forman A. Williams,et al.  Laminar flow between parallel plates with injection of a reactant at high reynolds number , 1978 .

[26]  Tim Edwards,et al.  Surrogate Mixtures to Represent Complex Aviation and Rocket Fuels , 2001 .

[27]  Robert J. Santoro,et al.  A study of jet fuel sooting tendency using the threshold sooting index (TSI) model , 2007 .

[28]  Ronald K. Hanson,et al.  n-Dodecane oxidation at high-pressures: Measurements of ignition delay times and OH concentration time-histories , 2009 .

[29]  Eric G. Eddings,et al.  Criteria for selection of components for surrogates of natural gas and transportation fuels , 2007 .

[30]  G. S. Samuelsen,et al.  Development and application of a surrogate distillate fuel , 1989 .

[31]  Tiziano Faravelli,et al.  Reference components of jet fuels: kinetic modeling and experimental results , 2004 .

[32]  David T. Anderson,et al.  Mechanistic studies of toluene destruction in diffusion flames , 1990 .

[33]  Kyoungtae Kim,et al.  Stabilization of monodisperse electrosprays in the multi-jet mode via electric field enhancement , 2006 .