Customizing Structure-Function Displacements in the Macula for Individual Differences.

PURPOSE In the macula, retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) are displaced from their receptive fields. We used optical coherence tomography (OCT) to customize displacements for individual eyes by taking into account macular shape parameters, and determined the likely effect of individual anatomical differences on structure-function mapping in the central visual field. METHODS Using the population average model of Drasdo et al. as a starting point, we altered the RGC count in that model based on the ratio of an individual's RGC layer plus inner plexiform layer thickness to the population average on a pointwise basis as a function of eccentricity from the fovea. For 20 adults (age, 24-33; median age, 28) with normal vision, we computed displacements with the original model and our customized approach. We report the variance in displacements among individuals and compare the effects of such displacements on structure-function mapping of the commonly used the 10-2 visual field pattern. RESULTS As expected, customizing the displacement using individual OCT data made only a small difference on average from the population-based values predicted by the Drasdo et al. model. However, the range between individuals was over 1° at many locations, and closer to 2° at some locations in the superior visual field. CONCLUSIONS Individualizing macular displacement measurements based on OCT data for an individual can result in large spatial shifts in the retinal area corresponding to 10-2 locations, which may be important for clinical structure-function analysis when performed on a local, spatial scale.

[1]  Donald C. Hood,et al.  Method for comparing visual field defects to local RNFL and RGC damage seen on frequency domain OCT in patients with glaucoma. , 2011, Biomedical optics express.

[2]  A. Hendrickson,et al.  Human photoreceptor topography , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[3]  G. Holder,et al.  Relationship between electrophysiological, psychophysical, and anatomical measurements in glaucoma. , 2002, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[4]  C. Mayama,et al.  Focal relationship between structure and function within the central 10 degrees in glaucoma. , 2014, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[5]  Gerald McGwin,et al.  Human chorioretinal layer thicknesses measured in macula-wide, high-resolution histologic sections. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[6]  Kazuichi Maruyama,et al.  Simulated Visual Fields Produced from Macular RNFLT Data in Patients with Glaucoma , 2013, Current eye research.

[7]  N. Drasdo,et al.  The length of Henle fibers in the human retina and a model of ganglion receptive field density in the visual field , 2007, Vision Research.

[8]  Richard A. Russell,et al.  Relating retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and functional estimates of ganglion cell sampling density in healthy eyes and in early glaucoma. , 2013, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[9]  K. Hirooka,et al.  Correlation between the ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness measured with cirrus HD-OCT and macular visual field sensitivity measured with microperimetry. , 2013, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[10]  Robert Ritch,et al.  A Test of a Model of Glaucomatous Damage of the Macula With High-Density Perimetry: Implications for the Locations of Visual Field Test Points. , 2014, Translational vision science & technology.

[11]  D. Hood,et al.  Retinal ganglion cell layer thickness and local visual field sensitivity in glaucoma. , 2011, Archives of ophthalmology.

[12]  D. Hood,et al.  On improving the use of OCT imaging for detecting glaucomatous damage , 2014, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[13]  Peter Wiedemann,et al.  Parametric model for the 3D reconstruction of individual fovea shape from OCT data. , 2014, Experimental eye research.

[14]  A. Turpin,et al.  Visual Contrast Detection Cannot be Predicted from Surrogate Measures of Retinal Ganglion Cell Number and Sampling Density in Healthy Young Adults. , 2014, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[15]  A. Harman,et al.  Neuronal density in the human retinal ganglion cell layer from 16–77 years , 2000, The Anatomical record.

[16]  C. Curcio,et al.  Topography of ganglion cells in human retina , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[17]  J. Sjöstrand,et al.  Morphometric study of the displacement of retinal ganglion cells subserving cones within the human fovea , 1999, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[18]  M. Steffen A simple method for monotonic interpolation in one dimension. , 1990 .

[19]  Donald C. Hood,et al.  Glaucomatous damage of the macula , 2013, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[20]  J. Sahel,et al.  Foveal shape and structure in a normal population. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[21]  A. Watson A formula for human retinal ganglion cell receptive field density as a function of visual field location. , 2014, Journal of vision.