Filling evidence gaps with expert opinion: The use of Delphi analysis in least-cost modelling of functional connectivity

Abstract Assessment of landscape functional connectivity is increasingly important for planning landscape scale conservation measures. However, measuring the functional connectivity of landscapes is challenging due to the lack of data on species landscape interactions and because connectivity is species-specific. We developed parameters for a connectivity indicator using Delphi analysis, and critically examine the use of Delphi analysis in this context. To calculate the connectivity indicator we used the following parameters: maximum dispersal distance, negative edge effects of different land cover, and relative permeability of different land cover. Delphi is a technique designed to numerically synthesise expert opinion in data-poor environments and is based on repetitive questionnaires interspersed with controlled feedback. Three panels of experts were assembled, one covering each of three habitats of interest. Experts found the process challenging especially fixing exact numbers given the potential range of values. However, panels generally assigned higher permeability and low edge effects to semi-natural land cover classes, assigning low permeability and high edge impacts to more modified land cover. During the Delphi process we found that experts were prepared to alter their answers in response to feedback from the previous round. Participants’ answers which did change between rounds generally changed to approach the group median, and when they did, the associated confidence score was more likely to rise than to fall. After three rounds, answers were generally stable. Delphi proved a useful method to use to generate parameter values for the connectivity indicator, with the method particularly acceptable to stakeholders of the indicator project.

[1]  J. Traba,et al.  Avoiding over-implementation of agri-environmental schemes for steppe bird conservation: a species-focused proposal based on expert criteria. , 2010, Journal of environmental management.

[2]  Thomas R. Stewart,et al.  The Delphi technique and judgmental forecasting , 1987 .

[3]  John L. Orrock,et al.  Meta‐analysis reveals the importance of matrix composition for animals in fragmented habitat , 2011 .

[4]  Pierre Joly,et al.  Modeling spatial distribution of amphibian populations: a GIS approach based on habitat matrix permeability , 2002, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[5]  Christian Wissel,et al.  Species Survival in Fragmented Landscapes: Where to From Here? , 2004, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[6]  D. Ojima,et al.  A Review of Climate‐Change Adaptation Strategies for Wildlife Management and Biodiversity Conservation , 2009, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[7]  Paul F. Donald,et al.  Habitat connectivity and matrix restoration: the wider implications of agri‐environment schemes , 2006 .

[8]  B. Emmett,et al.  Countryside Survey: UK Results from 2007 , 2008 .

[9]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  The Focal‐Species Approach and Landscape Restoration: a Critique , 2002 .

[10]  Erik Matthysen,et al.  The application of 'least-cost' modelling as a functional landscape model , 2003 .

[11]  Jyrki Kangas,et al.  Analyzing consistency of experts' judgments: Case of assessing forest biodiversity , 1998 .

[12]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure , 1993 .

[13]  W. Patrick,et al.  Using a five-factored structured decision analysis to evaluate the extinction risk of Atlantic sturgeon (Acipenser oxyrinchus oxyrinchus) , 2008 .

[14]  Sarah E. Gergel,et al.  Testing assumptions of cost surface analysis—a tool for invasive species management , 2007, Landscape Ecology.

[15]  R. Lambeck,et al.  Focal Species: a Multi-species Umbrella for Nature Conservation Focal Species for Nature Conservation Lambeck , 2022 .

[16]  D. Ray,et al.  Conserving Forest Biodiversity: Recent Approaches in UK Forest Planning and Management , 2008 .

[17]  J. Landeta.  Current validity of the Delphi method in social sciences , 2006 .

[18]  C. Braak,et al.  Toward Ecologically Scaled Landscape Indices , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[19]  Davide Geneletti,et al.  Formalising expert opinion through multi-attribute value functions: an application in landscape ecology. , 2005, Journal of environmental management.

[20]  Malcolm L. Hunter,et al.  A Meta‐Analysis of Forest Cover, Edge Effects, and Artificial Nest Predation Rates , 1998 .

[21]  Justin M. Calabrese,et al.  A comparison-shopper's guide to connectivity metrics , 2004 .

[22]  Paul Opdam,et al.  Ecological networks: A spatial concept for multi-actor planning of sustainable landscapes , 2006 .

[23]  Justin S. Brashares,et al.  Optimizing dispersal and corridor models using landscape genetics , 2007 .

[24]  Johnie H. Crance,et al.  Guidelines for Using the Delphi Technique to Develop Habitat Suitability Index Curves , 1987 .

[25]  K. Mengersen,et al.  The power of expert opinion in ecological models using Bayesian methods: impact of grazing on birds , 2005 .

[26]  Yvan Richard,et al.  Cost distance modelling of landscape connectivity and gap‐crossing ability using radio‐tracking data , 2010 .

[27]  E. Zavaleta,et al.  Biodiversity management in the face of climate change: A review of 22 years of recommendations , 2009 .

[28]  Michael Drielsma,et al.  A raster-based technique for analysing habitat configuration : The cost-benefit approach , 2007 .

[29]  Barry Wellar,et al.  Using the Delphi Technique in Normative Planning Research: Methodological Design Considerations , 2008 .

[30]  S. Sarkar,et al.  Systematic conservation planning , 2000, Nature.

[31]  T. Spies,et al.  Patterns and processes in forest landscapes : multiple use and sustainable management , 2008 .

[32]  L. Niles,et al.  An Objective Means of Species Status Assessment: Adapting the Delphi Technique , 2006 .

[33]  J. O’Hanley,et al.  Adapting landscapes to climate change: examples of climate-proof ecosystem networks and priority adaptation zones , 2008 .

[34]  Chris J. Johnson,et al.  Utility of Expert-Based Knowledge for Predicting Wildlife–Vehicle Collisions , 2009 .

[35]  Andrew Fall,et al.  The sensitivity of least-cost habitat graphs to relative cost surface values , 2010, Landscape Ecology.

[36]  K. E. Hodges,et al.  Effect of habitat area and isolation on fragmented animal populations , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  Kirk R. Klausmeyer,et al.  Resource management in a changing and uncertain climate , 2010 .

[38]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  Landscape connectivity and population distributions in heterogeneous environments , 1997 .

[39]  R. Foppen,et al.  Bridging the gap between ecology and spatial planning in landscape ecology , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[40]  Chris J. Johnson,et al.  Maintaining or restoring connectivity of modified landscapes: evaluating the least-cost path model with multiple sources of ecological information , 2010, Landscape Ecology.

[41]  Juri Pill,et al.  The Delphi method: Substance, context, a critique and an annotated bibliography , 1971 .

[42]  K. Watts,et al.  Developing a functional connectivity indicator to detect change in fragmented landscapes , 2010 .

[43]  Mike Hulme,et al.  Using expert knowledge to assess uncertainties in future polar bear populations under climate change , 2008 .

[44]  M. Schelhaas,et al.  A theoretical framework to assess the impacts of forest management on the recreational value of European forests , 2011 .

[45]  Chris Buckley,et al.  Delphi: a methodology for preferences more than predictions , 1995 .

[46]  Douglas C. MacMillan,et al.  The Delphi process – an expert‐based approach to ecological modelling in data‐poor environments , 2006 .

[47]  P. Beier,et al.  Uncertainty analysis of least-cost modeling for designing wildlife linkages. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[48]  F. Woudenberg.  An Evaluation of Delphi , 1991 .

[49]  P. J. Lozano,et al.  GIS-based approach for incorporating the connectivity of ecological networks into regional planning , 2010 .

[50]  Paul Beier,et al.  Forks in the Road: Choices in Procedures for Designing Wildland Linkages , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[51]  C. Murcia.  Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. , 1995, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[52]  Murray Turoff,et al.  The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications , 1976 .

[53]  D. Ray,et al.  Targeting and evaluating biodiversity conservation action within fragmented landscapes: an approach based on generic focal species and least-cost networks , 2010, Landscape Ecology.

[54]  I. Hanski,et al.  Connectivity Conservation: Connectivity and metapopulation dynamics in highly fragmented landscapes , 2006 .