Closing for the Benefit of Openness? The case of Wikimedia’s open strategy process

A growing number of organizations subscribe to ideals of openness in areas such as innovation or strategy-making, supported by digital technologies and fuelled by promises of better outcomes and increased legitimacy. However, by applying a relational lens of inclusion and exclusion, we argue that, paradoxically, certain forms of closure may be necessary to achieve desired open qualities in strategy-making. Analysing the case of Wikimedia, which called for participation in a globally open strategy-making process, we show that openness regarding participation in crafting strategy content depends on certain forms of closure regarding procedures of the strategy-making process. Against this background, we propose a two-dimensional framework of openness, in which content-related and procedural openness are characterized by a combination of open and closed elements.

[1]  Katja Hutter,et al.  Open Strategy – A New Strategy Paradigm? , 2014 .

[2]  Roderic N. Crooks,et al.  Seven dimensions of contemporary participation disentangled , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[3]  K. Ashcraft,et al.  Professionalization as a brand activity: occupational identity and the dialectic of inclusivity-exclusivity , 2012 .

[4]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[5]  M. Luedicke,et al.  Radically Open Strategizing: How the Premium Cola Collective Takes Open Strategy to the Extreme , 2017 .

[6]  Margit Osterloh,et al.  Open Source Software Development - Just Another Case of Collective Invention? , 2004 .

[7]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  Digital Inequality , 2008, Commun. Res..

[8]  Paul Thompson,et al.  Bureaucracy at work: misunderstandings and mixed blessings , 2005 .

[9]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[10]  Sayan Chatterjee,et al.  Democratizing Strategy: How Crowdsourcing Can Be Used for Strategy Dialogues , 2012 .

[11]  Sarah Kaplan,et al.  Strategy and PowerPoint: An Inquiry into the Epistemic Culture and Machinery of Strategy Making , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[12]  Subrata Biswas,et al.  The Future of Competition: Co-Creating Unique Value with Customers , 2004 .

[13]  Peter A. Chow-White,et al.  Digital Divide , 2018, Oxford Bibliographies Online Datasets.

[14]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Open Source Software and the "Private-Collective" Innovation Model: Issues for Organization Science , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[15]  R. Whittington,et al.  Opening Strategy: Evolution of a Precarious Profession , 2011 .

[16]  Robert D. Galliers,et al.  Social Media and the Emergence of Reflexiveness as a New Capability for Open Strategy , 2017, Strategic Information Management.

[17]  Christopher Grey,et al.  Bringing Secrecy into the Open: Towards a Theorization of the Social Processes of Organizational Secrecy , 2014 .

[18]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  Materiality and Change: Challenges to Building Better Theory about Technology and Organizing , 2008, Inf. Organ..

[19]  K. Desouza,et al.  Implementing Open Innovation in the Public Sector : the Case of Challenge.gov , 2013 .

[20]  Alan D. Meyer,et al.  Organizational Emergence: The Origin and Transformation of Branson, Missouri's Musical Theaters , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[21]  José David Vicente-Lorente,et al.  Specificity and opacity as resource‐based determinants of capital structure: evidence for Spanish manufacturing firms , 2001 .

[22]  Gerald E. Ledford,et al.  Demographic Dissimilarity and Workplace Inclusion , 1999 .

[23]  M. Bogers,et al.  Explicating Open Innovation: Clarifying an Emerging Paradigm for Understanding Innovation , 2014 .

[24]  Eugene Bardach,et al.  Developmental Dynamics: Interagency Collaboration as an Emergent Phenomenon , 2001 .

[25]  Loizos Heracleous,et al.  Open Strategy-Making at the Wikimedia Foundation: A Dialogic Perspective , 2018 .

[26]  S. Böhm,et al.  Liberalist Fantasies: Žižek and the Impossibility of the Open Society , 2007 .

[27]  P. Jarzabkowski.  Shaping Strategy as a Structuration Process , 2008 .

[28]  J. West,et al.  Leveraging External Sources of Innovation: A Review of Research on Open Innovation , 2013 .

[29]  Ed H. Chi,et al.  The singularity is not near: slowing growth of Wikipedia , 2009, Int. Sym. Wikis.

[30]  J. Freeman.  The Tyranny of Structurelessness , 2013 .

[31]  A. Strauss,et al.  Grounded theory , 2017 .

[32]  Aaron D. Shaw,et al.  The Wikipedia Gender Gap Revisited: Characterizing Survey Response Bias with Propensity Score Estimation , 2013, PloS one.

[33]  Raja Jayaraman.  Inclusion and exclusion , 2005 .

[34]  A. D. Ritchie.  The Open Society and its Enemies , 1946, Nature.

[35]  M. Mor-Barak,et al.  A Tool to Expand Organizational Understanding of Workforce Diversity , 1998 .

[36]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Strategy Formation in an Adhocracy. , 1985 .

[37]  P. Adler,et al.  Two Types of Bureaucracy: Enabling and Coercive , 1996 .

[38]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[39]  A. Langley.  Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[40]  Saku Mantere,et al.  On the Problem of Participation in Strategy: A Critical Discursive Perspective , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[41]  Thomas Gegenhuber,et al.  Crowdsourcing: Global search and the twisted roles of consumers and producers , 2015, Organization.

[42]  Karen Lee Ashcraft,et al.  Organized Dissonance: Feminist Bureaucracy as Hybrid Form , 2001 .

[43]  Juliet B. Schor,et al.  Paradoxes of openness and distinction in the sharing economy , 2016 .

[44]  Pamela S. Tolbert,et al.  Institutionalization and Structuration: Studying the Links between Action and Institution , 1997 .

[45]  Paul DiMaggio,et al.  From the 'Digital Divide' to 'Digital Inequality': Studying Internet Use as Penetration Increases , 2001 .

[46]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[47]  Renate E. Meyer,et al.  When Bureaucracy Meets the Crowd: Studying “Open Government” in the Vienna City Administration , 2017 .

[48]  C. Oswick,et al.  Discourses of Diversity, Equality and Inclusion: Trenchant Formulations or Transient Fashions? , 2014 .

[49]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation and Strategy , 2007 .

[50]  B. Wilpert,et al.  Conceptual dimensions and boundaries of participation in organizations: a critical evaluation. , 1978, Administrative science quarterly.

[51]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: A New Paradigm for Understanding Industrial Innovation , 2006 .

[52]  D. Gann,et al.  How open is innovation , 2010 .

[53]  M. Barak,et al.  Inclusion is the Key to Diversity Management, but What is Inclusion? , 2015 .

[54]  Signe Vikkelsø.  For Formal Organization: The Past in the Present and Future of Organization Theory , 2017 .

[55]  Linus Dahlander,et al.  Open to suggestions: How organizations elicit suggestions through proactive and reactive attention , 2014 .

[56]  E. Hargittai,et al.  Digital Inequality , 2008, Commun. Res..

[57]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Marginality and Problem-Solving Effectiveness in Broadcast Search , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[58]  Thomas Armbrüster,et al.  Uncharted Territories of Organizational Research: The Case of Karl Popper's Open Society and its Enemies , 2002 .

[59]  R. Whittington,et al.  Open Strategy: Dimensions, Dilemmas, Dynamics , 2017 .

[60]  Nathaniel Tkacz,et al.  From open source to open government : a critique of open politics , 2012 .

[61]  S. Kaiser,et al.  Organizational Identity and Paradox , 2015 .

[62]  Laura Dobusch.  How exclusive are inclusive organisations , 2014 .

[63]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Of strategies, deliberate and emergent , 1985, Strategic Management Journal.

[64]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government , 2012, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[65]  Catherine J. Turco.  The Conversational Firm: Rethinking Bureaucracy in the Age of Social Media , 2016 .

[66]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  Modeling a Paradigm Shift: From Producer Innovation to User and Open Collaborative Innovation , 2010, Organ. Sci..