Two car frontal collisions: the role of car mass, collision speed distribution and frontal stiffness in occupant fatality and injury

There is controversy regarding the role of car mass in injury and fatality risk in individual car-to-car collisions and for overall car populations. In addition the effect of frontal stiffness on both the case and the partner cars is disputed, and the role of the distribution of collision closing speed has not been adequately examined. In this paper empirical car crash characteristics derived from onboard crash recorders are combined with risk functions based on mean vehicle acceleration. The model predictions closely match the available real life data for frontal collisions for the US (fatalities), Japan and Germany (AIS3+). The model is used to predict the roles of case car mass, collision closing speed distributions and frontal stiffness in relative vehicle safety. Results show that increasing the 50th percentile car mass from 1200kg to 1600kg reduces the AIS3+ injury to drivers by 4%, while decreasing the 50th percentile car mass from 1200kg to 800kg increases overall risk by 15%. By comparison, reducing the 99.99thpercentile collision speed from 200km/h to 150km/h reduces injury risk by14%, but reducing the 50th percentile collision speed from 60 km/h to 50km/h reduces injury risk by 31%. Finally a car population with the structural characteristics of the 'soft' 50th percentile reduces injury risk by 23%.For the covering abstract see E134311.

[1]  Denis P. Wood,et al.  Frontal collision behaviour: Comparison of onboard collision recorder data with car population characteristics , 2005 .

[2]  G. Grime,et al.  The influence of vehicle weight on the risk of injury to drivers , 1982 .

[3]  Ciaran K Simms,et al.  Car size and injury risk: a model for injury risk in frontal collisions. , 2002, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[4]  Claes Tingvall,et al.  Injury frequency and injury panorama among drivers. A comparison between small and big cars and the influence of year model and production start , 1982 .

[5]  H Appel SAFETY OF CITY-CARS, CONFLICT BETWEEN ECOLOGY, ECONOMY, ROAD TRAFFIC BENEFITS AND SAFETY , 1992 .

[6]  David C. Viano,et al.  SAFETY OF A DOWNSIZED VEHICLE FLEET: EFFECTS OF MASS DISTRIBUTION, IMPACT SPEED AND INHERENT PROTECTION IN CAR-TO-CAR CRASHES , 1999 .

[7]  L Evans Fatality risk for belted drivers versus car mass. , 1985, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  M J Edwards,et al.  Development of test procedures and performance criteria to improve compatibility in car frontal collisions , 2003 .

[9]  H C Joksch,et al.  ANALYSIS OF THE FUTURE EFFECTS OF FUEL SHORTAGE AND INCREASED SMALL CAR USAGE UPON TRAFFIC DEATHS AND INJURIES. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY , 1976 .

[10]  Leonard Evans Car Size and Safety: a Review Focused on Identifying Causative Factors , 1994 .

[11]  H C Joksch,et al.  Velocity change and fatality risk in a crash--a rule of thumb. , 1993, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  H. C. Joksch Fatality risks in collisions between cars and light trucks , 1998 .

[13]  E. Brühning,et al.  COMPATIBILITY PROBLEMS OF SMALL AND LARGE PASSENGER CARS IN HEAD ON COLLISIONS , 1993 .

[14]  L. Evans,et al.  Driver injury and fatality risk in two-car crashes versus mass ratio inferred using Newtonian mechanics. , 1994, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  Hideki Yonezawa,et al.  The Relationship Between Car Size and Occupant Injury in Traffic Accidents in Japan , 1997 .

[16]  Anders Ydenius,et al.  Velocity changes, mean accelerations and displacements of some car types in frontal collisions , 2003 .

[17]  A. Ydenius,et al.  Car frontal collisions: occupant compartment forces, interface forces and stiffnesses , 2004 .

[18]  Anders Ydenius Influence of crash pulse duration on injury risk in frontal impacts based on real life crashes , 2002 .

[19]  G Faverjon,et al.  The problem of compatibility in car-to-car collisions , 1990 .

[20]  Anders Kullgren,et al.  Modelling of Frontal Collisions from Onboard Recorder and Full Width Barrier Data , 2005 .