Abstract Given the global spread of football (soccer) there are substantial differences in the playing surfaces used between FIFA member associations. This paper contains results from the second part of a study on elite football players’ perceptions of playing surfaces from across the globe. Using a questionnaire, which was developed based on an initial qualitative study, elite players’ perceptions of differences in surface properties between natural and artificial (football) turf were examined. In total, 1129 elite footballers, representing 43 countries across six FIFA confederations completed the questionnaire. Exploratory analysis of overall responses revealed that the players had strong opinions with regards to surface properties when directly comparing natural and football turf. In particular, a higher proportion of players stated that football turf was “Too hard/Harder” , “More level” , “More abrasive” and had “Less grip” compared to natural grass. The results also showed that overall players’ perceptions of surface properties, between natural grass and football turf were dependent on their experience of different playing surfaces during their junior and senior careers, in particular, the variability within football turf pitches.
[1]
Roald Bahr,et al.
Risk of injury on artificial turf and natural grass in young female football players
,
2007,
British Journal of Sports Medicine.
[2]
S. W. Baker,et al.
The effects of grass cutting height and pre-match rolling and watering on football pitch ground cover and playing quality.
,
2000
.
[3]
Jon Roberts,et al.
Elite player assessment of playing surfaces for football
,
2012
.
[4]
Björn Ekblom,et al.
Elite football on artificial turf versus natural grass: Movement patterns, technical standards, and player impressions
,
2008,
Journal of sports sciences.
[5]
Thorsten Sterzing,et al.
Comprehensive evaluation of player-surface interaction on artificial soccer turf
,
2010,
Sports biomechanics.