A framework to identify the core-competency of a SME; Case of Lensbaby LLC

Businesses live and die in their ability to correctly invest in areas of competence that delivers value to their customers using the company's unique capabilities, core competencies. There are very scant numbers of practical methods available in literature for determining the core-competencies in small medium enterprise (SME) level. The standard reported practices in the national and regional levels usually use the financial outputs, R&D investments and patent outputs as the main factors to quantify the technological capability in a specific industry or technology. At the firm level, either a benchmarking with the superior companies or a survey from customers shows the core-competencies of the firm respective to the competitors. This study proposes an innovative approach to develop a quantitative method based on customer acceptance (measured through financial outcomes of the products) to define the firm's core-competencies. Method is an indigenous approach which doesn't directly ask from neither customers nor employess/management about the company's competencies. Instead based on rate of success among previous products launched to the market, and common characteristics of the successful products, core-competencies are defined. The proposed Framework uses the simple regression analysis and multivariable regression analysis to recognize the correlation between predictor variables and success variable. This framework has been performed in a small size engineering/manufacturing company and results have been provided. Advantages and limitation of the method will be discussed at the end.

[1]  R. Grant The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation , 1991 .

[2]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Core Competence of the Corporation , 1990 .

[3]  D. Teece Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance , 2007 .

[4]  D. D. Carolis,et al.  Competencies and Imitability in the Pharmaceutical Industry: An Analysis of Their Relationship with Firm Performance , 2003 .

[5]  Ron Khormaei,et al.  Innovation topology: The dimensions and their characteristics that drive innovation , 2011, 2011 Proceedings of PICMET '11: Technology Management in the Energy Smart World (PICMET).

[6]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[7]  Fernando E. García-Muiña,et al.  Explaining and measuring success in new business: The effect of technological capabilities on firm results , 2007 .

[8]  D. Shepherd,et al.  Knowledge‐based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium‐sized businesses , 2003 .

[9]  Arnoldo C. Hax,et al.  The Strategy Concept and Process: A Pragmatic Approach , 1991 .

[10]  David J. Miller,et al.  The Resource-Based View of the Firm in Two Environments: The Hollywood Film Studios From 1936 to 1965 , 1996 .

[11]  Catherine L. Wang,et al.  Dynamic Capabilities: A Review and Research Agenda , 2007 .

[12]  K. Boal,et al.  Strategic resources: Traits, configurations and paths to sustainable competitive advantage , 2007 .

[13]  Kevin P. Coyne,et al.  Is your core competence a mirage , 1997 .

[14]  Khalid Hafeez,et al.  Core competence for sustainable competitive advantage: a structured methodology for identifying core competence , 2002, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[15]  Mie Augier,et al.  Dynamic capabilities and multinational enterprise: Penrosean insights and omissions , 2007 .