Separate Universe simulations with IllustrisTNG: baryonic effects on power spectrum responses and higher-order statistics
暂无分享,去创建一个
Annalisa Pillepich | Lars Hernquist | Dylan Nelson | Volker Springel | Mark Vogelsberger | Ruediger Pakmor | Alexandre Barreira | Fabian Schmidt | V. Springel | L. Hernquist | M. Vogelsberger | D. Nelson | A. Barreira | F. Schmidt | A. Pillepich | R. Pakmor
[1] A. Barreira. The squeezed matter bispectrum covariance with responses , 2019, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics.
[2] B. Hoyle,et al. Graph Database Solution for Higher-order Spatial Statistics in the Era of Big Data , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.
[3] Annalisa Pillepich,et al. The IllustrisTNG simulations: public data release , 2018, Computational Astrophysics and Cosmology.
[4] C. Heymans,et al. On the road to percent accuracy: non-linear reaction of the matter power spectrum to dark energy and modified gravity , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[5] E. Armengaud,et al. The one-dimensional power spectrum from the SDSS DR14 Lyα forests , 2018, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics.
[6] Eiichiro Komatsu,et al. Position-dependent power spectra of the 21-cm signal from the epoch of reionization , 2018, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics.
[7] R. Teyssier,et al. Quantifying baryon effects on the matter power spectrum and the weak lensing shear correlation , 2018, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics.
[8] David N. Spergel,et al. Constraining neutrino mass with the tomographic weak lensing bispectrum , 2018, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics.
[9] David N. Spergel,et al. Cosmology from cosmic shear power spectra with Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam first-year data , 2018, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan.
[10] Scott Dodelson,et al. Modelling baryonic physics in future weak lensing surveys , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[11] K. Benabed,et al. Information content of the weak lensing bispectrum for the next generation of galaxy surveys , 2018 .
[12] David Alonso,et al. The LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration (DESC) Science Requirements Document , 2018, 1809.01669.
[13] E. Krause,et al. Accurate cosmic shear errors: do we need ensembles of simulations? , 2018, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics.
[14] David N. Spergel,et al. Ingredients for 21 cm Intensity Mapping , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal.
[15] S. White,et al. Cosmological N-body simulations with a large-scale tidal field , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[16] C. Pichon,et al. The impact of baryons on the matter power spectrum from the Horizon-AGN cosmological hydrodynamical simulation , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[17] Yu Feng,et al. nbodykit: An Open-source, Massively Parallel Toolkit for Large-scale Structure , 2017, The Astronomical Journal.
[18] S. Borgani,et al. The effect of baryons in the cosmological lensing PDFs , 2017, 1711.10017.
[19] E. Krause,et al. Complete super-sample lensing covariance in the response approach , 2017, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics.
[20] M. Takada,et al. Impact of large-scale tides on cosmological distortions via redshift-space power spectrum , 2017, 1711.00012.
[21] B. Yanny,et al. Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing , 2017, Physical Review D.
[22] Karl Glazebrook,et al. KiDS-450 + 2dFLenS: Cosmological parameter constraints from weak gravitational lensing tomography and overlapping redshift-space galaxy clustering , 2017, 1707.06627.
[23] Cca,et al. First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: matter and galaxy clustering , 2017, 1707.03397.
[24] Annalisa Pillepich,et al. First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: the stellar mass content of groups and clusters of galaxies , 2017, 1707.03406.
[25] V. Springel,et al. First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: radio haloes and magnetic fields , 2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[26] E. Ramirez-Ruiz,et al. First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: a tale of two elements - chemical evolution of magnesium and europium , 2017, 1707.03401.
[27] G. Kauffmann,et al. First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: the galaxy colour bimodality , 2017, 1707.03395.
[28] Annalisa Pillepich,et al. Simulating galaxy formation with the IllustrisTNG model , 2017, 1703.02970.
[29] R. Croft,et al. Line-Intensity Mapping: 2017 Status Report , 2017, 1709.09066.
[30] Kazuhiro Yamamoto,et al. Gravitational redshifts of clusters and voids , 2017, 1709.05756.
[31] A. Barreira,et al. Response approach to the matter power spectrum covariance , 2017, 1705.01092.
[32] A. Barreira,et al. Responses in large-scale structure , 2017, 1703.09212.
[33] A. Slosar,et al. Response approach to the squeezed-limit bispectrum: application to the correlation of quasar and Lyman-α forest power spectrum , 2017, 1701.03375.
[34] M. Takada,et al. Large-scale tidal effect on redshift-space power spectrum in a finite-volume survey , 2016, 1611.04723.
[35] Kwan Chuen Chan,et al. Assessment of the Information Content of the Power Spectrum and Bispectrum , 2016, 1610.06585.
[36] V. Springel,et al. Simulating galaxy formation with black hole driven thermal and kinetic feedback , 2016, 1607.03486.
[37] W. M. Wood-Vasey,et al. The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: cosmological analysis of the DR12 galaxy sample , 2016, 1607.03155.
[38] Ashley J. Ross,et al. The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Constraining modified gravity , 2016, 1612.00812.
[39] W. Percival,et al. The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Cosmological implications of the configuration-space clustering wedges , 2016, 1607.03147.
[40] P. Schneider,et al. KiDS-450: cosmological parameter constraints from tomographic weak gravitational lensing , 2016, 1606.05338.
[41] Francisco-Shu Kitaura,et al. The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: RSD measurement from the power spectrum and bispectrum of the DR12 BOSS galaxies , 2016, 1606.00439.
[42] F. Schmidt,et al. Large-Scale Galaxy Bias , 2016, 1611.09787.
[43] D. Bertolini,et al. Principal shapes and squeezed limits in the effective field theory of large scale structure , 2016, 1608.01310.
[44] C. Frenk,et al. The effect of baryons on redshift space distortions and cosmic density and velocity fields in the EAGLE simulation , 2016, 1603.03328.
[45] M. Takada,et al. Separate universe consistency relation and calibration of halo bias , 2015, 1511.01454.
[46] Volker Springel,et al. Improving the convergence properties of the moving-mesh code AREPO , 2015, 1503.00562.
[47] C. Wagner,et al. Precision measurement of the local bias of dark matter halos , 2015, 1511.01096.
[48] R. Teyssier,et al. A new method to quantify the effects of baryons on the matter power spectrum , 2015, 1510.06034.
[49] Hal Finkel,et al. THE MIRA–TITAN UNIVERSE: PRECISION PREDICTIONS FOR DARK ENERGY SURVEYS , 2015, 1508.02654.
[50] Shahab Joudaki,et al. An accurate halo model for fitting non-linear cosmological power spectra and baryonic feedback models , 2015, 1505.07833.
[51] Ariel G. S'anchez,et al. Position-dependent correlation function from the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey Data Release 10 CMASS sample , 2015, 1504.03322.
[52] E. Pajer,et al. On separate universes , 2015, 1504.00351.
[53] E. Komatsu,et al. The angle-averaged squeezed limit of nonlinear matter N-point functions , 2015, 1503.03487.
[54] V. Springel. N-GenIC: Cosmological structure initial conditions , 2015 .
[55] Naoki Yoshida,et al. IMPACT OF BARYONIC PROCESSES ON WEAK-LENSING COSMOLOGY: POWER SPECTRUM, NONLOCAL STATISTICS, AND PARAMETER BIAS , 2015, 1501.02055.
[56] Martin Kilbinger,et al. Cosmology with cosmic shear observations: a review , 2014, Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society.
[57] E. Komatsu,et al. Separate universe simulations , 2014, 1409.6294.
[58] C. Heymans,et al. Baryons, neutrinos, feedback and weak gravitational lensing , 2014, 1407.4301.
[59] Scott Dodelson,et al. Accounting for baryonic effects in cosmic shear tomography: determining a minimal set of nuisance parameters using PCA , 2014, 1405.7423.
[60] Changbom Park,et al. Primordial non-Gaussian signatures in CMB polarization , 2014, 1411.5256.
[61] M. Takada,et al. Super-Sample Signal , 2014, 1408.1081.
[62] V. Springel,et al. Introducing the Illustris Project: the evolution of galaxy populations across cosmic time , 2014, 1405.3749.
[63] V. Springel,et al. Introducing the Illustris Project: simulating the coevolution of dark and visible matter in the Universe , 2014, 1405.2921.
[64] H. Hoekstra,et al. CFHTLenS: cosmological constraints from a combination of cosmic shear two-point and three-point correlations , 2014, 1404.5469.
[65] E. Komatsu,et al. Position-dependent power spectrum of the large-scale structure: a novel method to measure the squeezed-limit bispectrum , 2014, 1403.3411.
[66] M. Takada,et al. Super-Sample Covariance in Simulations , 2014, 1401.0385.
[67] J. Sainte-Marie,et al. Phytoplankton growth formulation in marine ecosystem models: should we take into account photo-acclimation and variable stoichiometry in oligotrophic areas? , 2013 .
[68] M. Takada,et al. Cosmological parameters from weak lensing power spectrum and bispectrum tomography: including the non-Gaussian errors , 2013, 1306.4684.
[69] Earl Lawrence,et al. THE COYOTE UNIVERSE EXTENDED: PRECISION EMULATION OF THE MATTER POWER SPECTRUM , 2013, 1304.7849.
[70] M. Takada,et al. Power spectrum super-sample covariance , 2013, 1302.6994.
[71] Masanori Sato,et al. Impact of the non-Gaussian covariance of the weak lensing power spectrum and bispectrum on cosmological parameter estimation , 2013, 1301.3588.
[72] Adam D. Myers,et al. Measurement of baryon acoustic oscillations in the Lyman-α forest fluctuations in BOSS data release 9 , 2013, 1301.3459.
[73] H. Hoekstra,et al. CFHTLenS: higher order galaxy–mass correlations probed by galaxy–galaxy–galaxy lensing , 2013, 1301.1863.
[74] Joop Schaye,et al. Effect of baryonic feedback on two- and three-point shear statistics: prospects for detection and improved modelling , 2012, 1210.7303.
[75] M. May,et al. Baryon impact on weak lensing peaks and power spectrum: Low-bias statistics and self-calibration in future surveys , 2012, 1210.0608.
[76] Abraham Loeb,et al. 21 cm cosmology in the 21st century , 2011, Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society.
[77] H. Hoekstra,et al. Quantifying the effect of baryon physics on weak lensing tomography , 2011, 1105.1075.
[78] Joop Schaye,et al. The effects of galaxy formation on the matter power spectrum: a challenge for precision cosmology , 2011, 1104.1174.
[79] Anthony Challinor,et al. CAMB: Code for Anisotropies in the Microwave Background , 2011 .
[80] T. Schrabback,et al. Weak lensing from space: first cosmological constraints from three-point shear statistics★ , 2010, 1005.4941.
[81] J. Schaye,et al. The physics driving the cosmic star formation history , 2009, 0909.5196.
[82] V. Springel. E pur si muove: Galilean-invariant cosmological hydrodynamical simulations on a moving mesh , 2009, 0901.4107.
[83] H. Hoekstra,et al. Weak Gravitational Lensing and Its Cosmological Applications , 2008, 0805.0139.
[84] S. Furlanetto,et al. Cosmology at low frequencies: The 21 cm transition and the high-redshift Universe , 2006, astro-ph/0608032.
[85] M. Crocce,et al. Cosmology and the Bispectrum , 2006, astro-ph/0604505.
[86] V. Springel. The Cosmological simulation code GADGET-2 , 2005, astro-ph/0505010.
[87] Northwestern,et al. Weak lensing bispectrum , 2005, astro-ph/0501063.
[88] M. Lombardi,et al. The three-point correlation function of cosmic shear II. Relation to the bispectrum of the projected mass density and generalized third-order aperture measures , 2003, astro-ph/0308328.
[89] J. Brinkmann,et al. The Lyα Forest Power Spectrum from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey , 2004, astro-ph/0405013.
[90] G. Bernstein,et al. The skewness of the aperture mass statistic , 2003, astro-ph/0307393.
[91] Y. Mellier,et al. Detection of Dark Matter Skewness in the VIRMOS-DESCART Survey: Implications for Ω0 , 2003, astro-ph/0302031.
[92] S. Colombi,et al. Large scale structure of the universe and cosmological perturbation theory , 2001, astro-ph/0112551.
[93] A. Cooray,et al. Weak Gravitational Lensing Bispectrum , 2000, astro-ph/0004151.
[94] A. Lewis,et al. Efficient computation of CMB anisotropies in closed FRW models , 1999, astro-ph/9911177.
[95] M. Zaldarriaga,et al. Power Spectrum Correlations Induced by Nonlinear Clustering , 1999, astro-ph/9901099.
[96] H. Gove,et al. Annual Review Of Nuclear And Particle Science , 1984 .