Diagram Interaction during Intelligent Tutoring in Geometry : Support for Knowledge Retention and Deep Transfer

Prior research has shown that skilled problem solvers often demonstrate meaningful links between relevant visual and verbal knowledge components, but little is known about how to support novice learners in connecting visual and verbal information during learning or whether such support will improve learning outcomes. This work explored two methods to support meaningful connections between visual and verbal information in an intelligent tutor for geometry: 1) student interaction with diagrams during problem solving, and 2) student explanations that connected diagram features to geometry rules at each problem-solving step. Research was conducted in 10 grade classrooms using an experimental version of the Geometry Cognitive Tutor. Results demonstrated that interaction with diagrams promoted longterm retention of problem-solving skills and supported performance on transfer tasks; diagram-rule explanations did not significantly influence learning. Findings suggest that student focus on relevant visual information should be carefully integrated into problem-solving practice to support deep learning.

[1]  Richard Lowe,et al.  Constructing a mental representation from an abstract technical diagram , 1993 .

[2]  Albert T. Corbett,et al.  Modeling Student Knowledge: Cognitive Tutors in High School and College , 2000, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[3]  R. Kozma The material features of multiple representations and their cognitive and social affordances for science understanding , 2003 .

[4]  Richard K. Lowe Extracting information from an animation during complex visual learning , 1999 .

[5]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction , 1999 .

[6]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Abstract Planning and Perceptual Chunks: Elements of Expertise in Geometry , 1990, Cogn. Sci..

[7]  C. Lebiere,et al.  The Atomic Components of Thought , 1998 .

[8]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Cognitive Tutors: Lessons Learned , 1995 .

[9]  Despina A. Stylianou,et al.  On the interaction of visualization and analysis: the negotiation of a visual representation in expert problem solving , 2002 .

[10]  Vincent Aleven,et al.  An effective metacognitive strategy: learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based Cognitive Tutor , 2002, Cogn. Sci..

[11]  Hans Spada,et al.  The Active Integration of Information during Learning with Dynamic and Interactive Visualisations , 2004 .

[12]  R. A. Tarmizi,et al.  Guidance during Mathematical Problem Solving. , 1988 .

[13]  M C Lovett,et al.  Effects of solving related proofs on memory and transfer in geometry problem solving. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  Mary A. Mark,et al.  An Interview Reflection on “Intelligent Tutoring Goes to School in the Big City” , 2015, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.