An overview of mixed methods research

Abstract Mixed methods research is viewed as the third methodological movement and as an approach it has much to offer health and social science research. Its emergence was in response to the limitations of the sole use of quantitative or qualitative methods and is now considered by many a legitimate alternative to these two traditions. Purists’ view of the dichotomy between positivist and non-positivist philosophies is prevalent; however, mixed methods afford researchers an opportunity to overcome this ‘false dichotomy’. The philosophical underpinning of pragmatism allows and guides mixed methods researchers to use a variety of approaches to answer research questions that cannot be addressed using a singular method. In particular, healthcare researchers may benefit from the opportunity to use such a dynamic approach to address the complex and multi-faceted research problems often encountered in the health care sector.

[1]  Jennifer Caroline Greene,et al.  The generative potential of mixed methods inquiry1 , 2005 .

[2]  Jon Nicholl,et al.  Integration and Publications as Indicators of "Yield" From Mixed Methods Studies , 2007 .

[3]  Jennifer Caroline Greene,et al.  Crafting mixed‐method evaluation designs , 1997 .

[4]  David D. Williams,et al.  Reconsidering the Compatibility Thesis and Eclecticism: Five Proposed Guidelines for Method Use , 2006 .

[5]  Sally Sieloff Magnan,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 1997 .

[6]  A. Bryman Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done? , 2006 .

[7]  K. Howe Against the Quantitative-Qualitative Incompatibility Thesis or Dogmas Die Hard , 1988 .

[8]  K. Howe,et al.  Two Dogmas of Educational Research , 1985 .

[9]  A. Onwuegbuzie,et al.  Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come , 2004 .

[10]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research , 2006 .

[11]  Abbas Tashakkori,et al.  A general typology of research designs featuring mixed methods. , 2006 .

[12]  J. Creswell,et al.  Mixed Methods Research Designs in Counseling Psychology. , 2005 .

[13]  Chris Stevenson Practical inquiry/theory in nursing. , 2005, Journal of advanced nursing.

[14]  Jennifer Caroline Greene,et al.  Defining and describing the paradigm issue in mixed‐method evaluation , 1997 .

[15]  David M. Fetterman,et al.  Qualitative Approaches to Evaluation in Education: The Silent Scientific Revolution , 1988 .

[16]  A. Bryman Barriers to Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Research , 2007 .

[17]  Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie,et al.  Positivists, Post-Positivists, Post-Structuralists, and Post-Modernists: Why Can't We All Get Along? Towards a Framework for Unifying Research Paradigms. , 2000 .

[18]  John K. Smith,et al.  Closing Down the Conversation: The End of the Quantitative-Qualitative Debate Among Educational Inquirers , 1986 .

[19]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Using Mixed-Methods Sequential Explanatory Design: From Theory to Practice , 2006 .

[20]  D. Morgan Paradigms Lost and Pragmatism Regained , 2007 .

[21]  Valerie J. Caracelli,et al.  Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs , 1989 .

[22]  K. Brazil,et al.  Revisiting the Quantitative-Qualitative Debate: Implications for Mixed-Methods Research , 2002, Quality & quantity.

[23]  Nancy L. Leech,et al.  A typology of mixed methods research designs , 2009 .

[24]  Egon G. Guba,et al.  What Have We Learned About Naturalistic Evaluation , 1987 .

[25]  W. Firestone Meaning in Method: The Rhetoric of Quantitative and Qualitative Research , 1987 .

[26]  J. Appleton,et al.  Journeying from the philosophical contemplation of constructivism to the methodological pragmatics of health services research. , 2002, Journal of advanced nursing.

[27]  J. Creswell,et al.  Editorial: The New Era of Mixed Methods , 2007 .

[28]  A. Onwuegbuzie,et al.  Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research , 2007 .

[29]  M Sandelowski,et al.  Combining qualitative and quantitative sampling, data collection, and analysis techniques in mixed-method studies. , 2000, Research in nursing & health.