Comparisons of image quality and radiation dose between iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection reconstruction algorithms in 256-MDCT coronary angiography.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study is to compare image quality and radiation dose between iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection (FBP) reconstruction algorithms in 256-MDCT coronary angiography. SUBJECTS AND METHODS One hundred nine consecutive patients were scanned with an ECG-gated helical technique using a 256-MDCT scanner. The patients in group A were scanned using the conventional tube output (120 kVp and 1000 mAs), and images were reconstructed using FBP. The other three groups were scanned with the same peak kilovoltage but with successively reduced tube current-time product, as follows: group B, 600 mAs; group C, 500 mAs; and group D, 400 mAs. Images were reconstructed using different levels of a new iterative reconstruction technique (iDose(4), Philips Healthcare). Noise, contrast-to-noise ratio, effective radiation dose, and scores of sharpness, contrast, and acceptability (where 1 indicates the worst, and 4 indicates the best) were compared between the four groups. RESULTS Noise in group A (mean [± SD], 16 ± 2 HU) was significantly higher than that in groups B (12 ± 2 HU), C (14 ± 2 HU), and D (13 ± 2 HU; p < 0.001). The contrast-to-noise ratio in groups B, C, and D was significantly higher than that in group A (p = 0.03). There were no differences in contrast, sharpness, and acceptability of images between group A and groups B and C. Using the criterion of image quality (score, 4), the receiver operating characteristic curve of dose levels and image quality acceptability established a reduction of 50% of tube output (group C) as the optimum cutoff point (area under the curve, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.57-0.82). The effective dose of group C was 55% lower than that of group A (5.5 ± 0.6 vs 12.0 ± 1.5 mSv). CONCLUSION Iterative reconstruction can provide equivalent or improved coronary image quality on coronary CT angiography, compared to routine-dose FBP reconstruction, while enabling radiation dose reductions of 55%.

[1]  Borut Marincek,et al.  Dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography: influence of obesity, calcium load, and heart rate on diagnostic accuracy. , 2008, European heart journal.

[2]  James K Min,et al.  Estimated radiation dose reduction using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction in coronary CT angiography: the ERASIR study. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  R. Siemund,et al.  Hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithm improves image quality in craniocervical CT angiography. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  D. Sahani,et al.  Reducing Abdominal CT Radiation Dose With Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Technique , 2010, Investigative radiology.

[5]  G. Raff.  Radiation dose from coronary CT angiography: five years of progress. , 2010, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[6]  Bernhard Bischoff,et al.  Impact of a reduced tube voltage on CT angiography and radiation dose: results of the PROTECTION I study. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[7]  Gd Rotterdam,et al.  High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography , 2006 .

[8]  F. Jungmann,et al.  Erfassung und Monitoring der radiologischen Strahlenexposition , 2013, Der Radiologe.

[9]  Simon Wildermuth,et al.  Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. , 2005 .

[10]  M. Budoff.  Maximizing dose reductions with cardiac CT , 2008, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[11]  William H. Judy,et al.  The Measurement, Reporting, and Management of Radiation Dose in CT , 2008 .

[12]  U. Schoepf,et al.  The Role of Iterative Reconstruction Techniques in Cardiovascular CT , 2013, Current Radiology Reports.

[13]  J. Debatin,et al.  Radiation exposure during cardiac CT: effective doses at multi-detector row CT and electron-beam CT. , 2003, Radiology.

[14]  Fuminari Tatsugami,et al.  Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating. , 2007, European heart journal.

[15]  E. Samei,et al.  Low-tube-voltage, high-tube-current multidetector abdominal CT: improved image quality and decreased radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm--initial clinical experience. , 2010, Radiology.

[16]  Konstantin Nikolaou,et al.  Accuracy of multidetector spiral computed tomography in identifying and differentiating the composition of coronary atherosclerotic plaques: a comparative study with intracoronary ultrasound. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  T Nielsen,et al.  Adaptive temporal resolution optimization in helical cardiac cone beam CT reconstruction. , 2003, Medical physics.

[18]  M. Reiser,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source multi-slice CT-coronary angiography in patients with an intermediate pretest likelihood for coronary artery disease. , 2007, European heart journal.

[19]  Jiang Hsieh,et al.  Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques. , 2010, Radiology.

[20]  H. Kauczor,et al.  The effect of iterative image reconstruction algorithms on the feasibility of automated plaque assessment in coronary CT angiography , 2013, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[21]  Jörg Hausleiter,et al.  Radiation Dose Estimates From Cardiac Multislice Computed Tomography in Daily Practice: Impact of Different Scanning Protocols on Effective Dose Estimates , 2006, Circulation.

[22]  F. Pfeiffer,et al.  Emerging Research on Bone Health Using High-Resolution CT and MRI , 2013, Current Radiology Reports.

[23]  Zhao-qi Zhang,et al.  320-row CT coronary angiography: effect of 100-kV tube voltages on image quality, contrast volume, and radiation dose , 2011, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[24]  Masao Kiguchi,et al.  Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography: assessment of image quality, stenosis, and radiation dose. , 2008, Radiology.

[25]  Matthew J. Walker,et al.  Prospectively gated axial CT coronary angiography: preliminary experiences with a novel low-dose technique , 2009, European Radiology.

[26]  M. Vembar,et al.  Prospectively versus retrospectively ECG-gated 256-slice coronary CT angiography: image quality and radiation dose over expanded heart rates , 2010, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[27]  U. Schoepf,et al.  Iterative reconstruction to preserve image quality and diagnostic accuracy at reduced radiation dose in coronary CT angiography: an intraindividual comparison. , 2013, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[28]  C J Martin,et al.  Relationships between patient size, dose and image noise under automatic tube current modulation systems , 2014, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[29]  Borut Marincek,et al.  Accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: first experience in a high pre-test probability population without heart rate control , 2006, European Radiology.

[30]  S. Abbara,et al.  Prospectively Gated Transverse Coronary CT Angiography versus Retrospectively Gated Helical Technique: Improved Image Quality and Reduced Radiation Dose , 2008 .

[31]  R. Morin,et al.  Radiation dose in computed tomography of the heart. , 2003, Circulation.

[32]  Ne Pacific.  Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for 64-detector CT of the coronary arteries: comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose , 2008 .

[33]  G. Raff,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[34]  Kelley R Branch,et al.  Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for 64-detector CT of the coronary arteries: comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose. , 2008, Radiology.

[35]  W. B. Meijboom,et al.  Reliable high-speed coronary computed tomography in symptomatic patients. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[36]  Sae Rom Hong,et al.  Combined use of automatic tube potential selection with tube current modulation and iterative reconstruction technique in coronary CT angiography. , 2013, Radiology.

[37]  F. Stålhammar,et al.  Six iterative reconstruction algorithms in brain CT: a phantom study on image quality at different radiation dose levels. , 2013, The British journal of radiology.

[38]  Alvin C. Silva,et al.  Iterative Reconstruction Technique for Reducing Body Radiation Dose at Ct: Feasibility Study Hara Et Al. Ct Iterative Reconstruction Technique Gastrointestinal Imaging Original Research , 2022 .

[39]  R Haberl,et al.  A dynamic approach to identifying desired physiological phases for cardiac imaging using multislice spiral CT. , 2003, Medical physics.

[40]  M. Kachelriess.  Iterative Reconstruction Techniques: What do they Mean for Cardiac CT? , 2013, Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports.

[41]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Iterative reconstruction in image space (IRIS) in cardiac computed tomography: initial experience , 2011, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[42]  Matthias Renker,et al.  Iterative image reconstruction: a realistic dose-saving method in cardiac CT imaging? , 2013, Expert review of cardiovascular therapy.

[43]  H. Nathoe,et al.  The effect of iterative reconstruction on quantitative computed tomography assessment of coronary plaque composition , 2013, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[44]  Gabriel P Krestin,et al.  Optimal electrocardiographic pulsing windows and heart rate: effect on image quality and radiation exposure at dual-source coronary CT angiography. , 2008, Radiology.

[45]  Borut Marincek,et al.  Radiation dose estimates in dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography , 2008, European Radiology.

[46]  M. Zheng,et al.  Image quality of ultra-low-dose dual-source CT angiography using high-pitch spiral acquisition and iterative reconstruction in young children with congenital heart disease. , 2013, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[47]  J. Remy,et al.  Chest computed tomography using iterative reconstruction vs filtered back projection (Part 2): image quality of low-dose CT examinations in 80 patients , 2011, European Radiology.

[48]  M. Hadamitzky,et al.  Prospective ECG-triggered sequential scan protocol for coronary dual-source CT angiography: initial experience , 2009, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[49]  J Y Wang,et al.  A new iterative algorithm to reconstruct the refractive index , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.